ETH IVIA Lab’s Post

ETH IVIA Lab reposted this

View profile for Lukas Klein, graphic

PhD Candidate at ETH Zürich & DKFZ

🔍 Picking the right explainable AI method for your computer vision task? Wondering about its evaluation reliability? Check out our latest #neurips2024 D&B publication on LATEC, a (meta-)evaluation benchmark for XAI methods and metrics. #xai 🚀 Through LATEC, we showcase the risk of conflicting metrics causing unreliable rankings and propose a more robust evaluation scheme. We critically evaluated 17 XAI methods across 20 metrics in 7,560 unique setups, including varied architectures & input modalities. 🎯 Curiously, the emerging top-performing method is not examined in any relevant related study. Dive into our findings: Paper: https://lnkd.in/eApfZJvg Benchmark: https://lnkd.in/ePYMWv3h   👥 This work was a Team effort involving Carsten Lüth, Udo Schlegel, Till Bungert, Mennatallah El-Assady, and Paul F. Jaeger.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Khoa Tuan Nguyen

PhD student at Ghent University Global Campus (GUGC)

1mo

Thank you for sharing. It seems the Benchmark (GitHub link) is broken.

Like
Reply
Eike Petersen

Robust and fair medical AI

1mo

Great work, congratulations! Spoiler for the curious: the "emerging top-performing method" is Expected Gradients. ;-) The stratification by modality is also highly appreciated.

Ana Lucic

Assistant Professor at the University of Amsterdam

1mo

Looking forward to reading this!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics