Jamie Broderick’s Post

View profile for Jamie Broderick, graphic

Advocate for impact investment and board member, Impact Investing Institute

The UK debate around defined contribution/master trust pension schemes investing in private markets - how important is that for impact investing? Very. According to a survey conducted for the The Defined Contribution Investment Forum, 70% of schemes invest in private markets or intend to, and another 19% are still considering it. The primary motivation is to improve diversification and risk-adjusted returns, as you'd expect. But 84% of schemes who are or will be allocating to illiquids are also very or somewhat motivated by a desire to improve sustainability and reach Net Zero (see below). Most schemes seem to be waiting for quarterly-priced LTAFs (Long-Term Asset Funds), and there aren't very many of these yet, although Schroders Greencoat LLP just launched a renewables energy transition LTAF a few months ago. In the meantime, though, Andrew Dykes at Jura Capital reminds us that there are £25 billion of renewable infrastructure and social impact investment trusts listed on the London Stock Exchange, with daily dealing for schemes that require that. The survey report is available at: https://lnkd.in/eM3SjUFF #impactinvesting #pensions #privatemarkets #renewables #energytransition Mark Austin Elena Zhmurova Callum Stewart FFA Susannah Nicklin, CFA

  • No alternative text description for this image
Andrew Dykes

Jura Capital and founder of the Global Sustainability Trust (GST) initiative

9mo

Thank you Jamie Broderick for highlighting these interesting survey results. Here is the chart of the impactful LSE-listed investment trusts which you kindly referred to.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Charlotte O'Leary

Systems change and better business leader | CEO | Board member | Hyrox athlete All views shared are my own unless I specifically reference a company or group that I work for

9mo

Jamie Broderick - thank you for sharing. If only one of the other questions had been, how interconnected do you think these objectives are? My guess would be not very given the responses and herein lies the difficulty. Improving risk-adjusted returns (financial output of investment) is dependent on many of the other factors listed that were not seen as as important. Why? Because we look for direct causality, not interconnection. These objectives are not mutually exclusive.

Bonnie-Lyn de Bartok

Founder | Social Risk & Performance Expert I Impact Finance Innovations | Inclusive Capitalism

9mo

Well then, it’s a good thing you are aware of many risk-adjusted solutions. Including ours! Happy to help!

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics