Thoughts: this news story broke yesterday in the DMV. What are your thought on a SRO’s being assigned to elementary schools? Is it better to add those resources to secondary level? Does/ should the school system have a say in determining where SRO’s are placed? Who is ultimately responsible for school safety? LE or the school system? While this is local issue at this point, it seems law enforcement in some jurisdictions want to be more hands on in school security. How do school systems/ school safety professionals/ supers proactively deal with these politically charged debates? This type of disagreement doesn’t seem good for anyone. Someone shared: Loudoun Co. superintendent urges against elementary school SROs despite calls from sheriff https://lnkd.in/e-_vucvF
Elementary schools, in my opinion are some of the most vulnerable due to the inability of the students, based upon their age to fully understand and seek refuge or have the cognitive skills to flee. I fully support SRO’s on elementary campuses not just from a security perspective but from a holistic, all encompassing community approach. Due to current political events in the nation I truly believe the foundation of effective police work starts with establishing trust at a young age with the future of America and there is no better place to establish trust and relationships than in an elementary school.
My first SRO gig was at an Elementary school. Best job hands down. If funding and manpower allows then all schools should have them. The key is that the Superintendent and the Chief/Sheriff need a good working relationship, not just a media circus. Information like this should be a joint release, not just one trying to outdo the other. In the end it is up to the Super and board on whether or not they allow it.
There is no way to put a value on having a uniformed police officer in a school. At one time in their life, each child will either be a victim or a witness to a crime. These relationships could help future encounters with law enfocement. The entire premise of the program is relationship building. What better place to do that then elementary schools. It could set the foundation for students getting used to having a uniformed presence in the school. The true question is what will the do all day. This is where DARE,GREAT and programs like Eddie Eagle could come into play. In addition, this age group is our most vulnerable. The protection provided by the SRO on campus is a bonus to the above.
Elementary schools should especially have an SRO due to the reality that a threat to the school like those seen in Sandy Hook and Uvalde is more likely to be a non-student and thus harder to identify within the school. Still, the best way to stop a shooting at ANY school is to have a present, armed, and willing person to confront the threat immediately. All schools need an SRO.
I would direct them to the Sandy Hook example for needing SROs at that level.
The theistic behavior control mechanisms have been removed from the schools and homes. Children are not being taught caring and empathy toward one another. One of the benefits of DARE programs in elementary schools was an increase in trust between students and police. I propose designing classes to teach children empathy and caring for one another. It’s easy to identify children who would benefit from empathy indoctrination. There is a lack of communication and cooperation between parents and educators. The hostility and aggression in children can be attributed to similar behaviors in parents. SRO’s in uniform teaching children behavior control, caring and empathy in pre-school, kindergarten and elementary schools could help reduce the number of teenagers who commit acts of violence against others in middle school and high school.. Identify the children who are manifesting anger issues early and teach them how to act.
Jason. This is not a question of having or not having a certain person in a school. It is a question of having the right people in the schools to keep our schools safe. If superintendents are urging against putting SROs in elementary schools, then who do they suggest. School safety comes down to understanding the threats posed to you and doing everything in your power to prevent/mitigate those threats. If you understand the threats and you consciously choose not to implement a solution, then it is your responsibility to find a suitable alternative. If you say no to having SROs, then who (or what) is your alternative. Because at the end of the day, if you have something happen at one of your schools, you will have to answer for the decisions you made and how effective those decisions were.
Director, Center for Safe Schools
7moThe placement of school resource officers in elementary schools goes way beyond that of security. Establishing positive relations is a pivotal part of the Sro’s role, and the sooner students can be exposed to this opportunity, the more effective these positions are as students elevate through middle and high school. Not to mention the inherent need to have a law enforcement partner at that level to assist with safety planning, training, physical risk assessments, BTA, and critical incident management. Properly selected and trained of course.