Joanna Smolenski, Ph.D.’s Post

Physicians, let your voice be heard! Should pre-procedural informed consent procedures be performed by physicians themselves or delegated to staff members? Share your thoughts and expertise in our latest poll! 🗳️💬 Your insights are invaluable! Join the conversation now: https://loom.ly/UMwtLO4 #NASS #SpineCare #MedicalEthics #SpineLineMagazine

🎓During LIVES 2024, new guidelines on End-of-Life Care were published, offering valuable insights for critical care professionals. Join our 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐧𝐝-𝐨𝐟-𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐞-𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐞 (Nov. 7-8) to dive deeper into these essential updates and enhance your knowledge in: 🔹 End-of-life decision-making with members of the healthcare team 🔹Effective communication with relatives who may be anxious, angry, confused, or litigious 🔹Understanding of the role of palliative care, to support dying patients and their families and relieve their distress Register now! 👉 https://loom.ly/rlk9rsQ #IntensiveCare #CriticalCare #Ethics

In this second video of our “VSED: The Ethical Dilemma” series, we take an in-depth look at the complex balance between patient autonomy and justice in healthcare. What should you do when a patient expresses their desire to voluntarily stop eating and drinking because they no longer wish to live? We break down the ethical responsibilities of Registered Dietitians and healthcare professionals, exploring practical approaches to uphold patient rights while maintaining professional ethics. Join us as we navigate these challenging conversations, providing insights to better support patients with compassion, understanding, and ethical integrity. Don’t miss this essential discussion to enhance your practice and decision-making skills. #VSED #EthicalDilemma #PatientAutonomy #HealthcareEthics #RegisteredDietitians #HealthcareProfessionals #EthicalResponsibilities #PatientRights #ProfessionalEthics #CompassionateCare #EthicalIntegrity #HealthcareDecisions #SupportPatients #HealthcarePractice #DecisionMakingSkills

Siow Ching Yee vs Columbia Asia Medicolegal Forum Register now.. Title: Exploring the Siow Ching Yee vs Columbia Asia Landmark Trial: Implications for Healthcare Practices Date: April 3, 2024, Wednesday Time: 9:00 PM Duration: 1 to 1.5 hours Introduction: The Siow Ching Yee vs Columbia Asia case stands as a pivotal moment in medicolegal history, shaping the landscape of healthcare practices and patient rights. This forum brings together esteemed panelists to delve into the intricacies of this landmark trial, its implications on medical ethics, and the broader implications for healthcare providers. Panelists: Mr. Manmohan Dhillon, Partner of PS Ranjan Datuk Dr. Kuljit Singh, President of the Association of Private Hospitals of Malaysia Mr. Japhire Gopi Kannan, Founder and CEO of Doctorshield Agenda: 1. Case Overview: Brief summary of the Siow Ching Yee vs Columbia Asia case, highlighting key events, legal arguments, and the final verdict. 2. Medical Ethics and Standards: Discussion on the ethical considerations raised by the case, including issues of patient consent, standard of care, and professional accountability. 3. Legal Implications: Analysis of the legal precedents set by the trial and its impact on future medicolegal cases in Malaysia and beyond. 4. Patient Rights and Advocacy: Examination of the case's influence on patient rights awareness, empowerment, and the role of advocacy in healthcare. 5. Healthcare Provider Perspectives: Insights from healthcare providers on how the case has influenced their practices, patient interactions, and risk management strategies. 6. Q&A Session: Audience engagement session, allowing participants to seek clarification, share insights, and discuss implications for their own practices. Conclusion: The Siow Ching Yee vs Columbia Asia case serves as a poignant reminder of the complex interplay between medicine, law, and ethics in healthcare. This forum aims to deepen our understanding of these dynamics and foster a dialogue that promotes ethical, patient-centered care.

Just in case anyone needs a reminder of who Trump's nominee to head CMS is: "Dr. Mehmet Oz is widely known not just as a successful media personality donning the title “America’s Doctor®,” but, we suggest, also as a physician visibly out of step with his profession. A recent, unsuccessful attempt to censure Dr. Oz raises the issue of whether the medical profession can effectively self-regulate at all. It also raises concern that the medical profession’s self-regulation might be selectively activated, perhaps only when the subject of professional censure has achieved a level of public visibility. We argue here that the medical profession must look at itself with a healthy dose of self-doubt about whether it has sufficient knowledge of or handle on the less visible Dr. “Ozes” quietly operating under the profession’s presumptive endorsement."

Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: When Patients Refuse Treatment In the healthcare field, we often encounter complex situations that challenge our ethical principles. One such scenario is when a patient refuses medication or medical intervention. This refusal can stem from various reasons, including personal beliefs, fear of side effects, or a desire for autonomy. As healthcare professionals, our primary duty is to advocate for the patient's well-being while respecting their autonomy and informed decisions. However, this balance can be incredibly challenging. Here are some key ethical dilemmas we face in these situations: 1. Respect for Autonomy vs. Beneficence: We must respect a patient's right to make their own decisions, even if we believe that refusing treatment may harm them. This conflict between respecting autonomy and our duty to do good (beneficence) is at the heart of many ethical debates¹. 2. Informed Consent: Ensuring that patients fully understand the implications of refusing treatment is crucial. This includes discussing potential risks, benefits, and alternatives. However, the challenge lies in communicating complex medical information in a way that is comprehensible and respectful of the patient's perspective². 3. Risk to Others: In some cases, a patient's refusal of treatment may pose a risk to others, such as in infectious diseases or severe psychiatric conditions. Here, the ethical principle of non-maleficence (do no harm) extends beyond the individual patient to the broader community³. 4. Legal and Ethical Boundaries: Navigating the legal aspects of treatment refusal can be complex. Laws vary by region, and healthcare providers must be aware of their legal obligations while upholding ethical standards⁴. 5. Emotional and Moral Distress: Healthcare providers often experience moral distress when they feel unable to provide the care they believe is necessary. Support systems and ethical consultations can help mitigate this distress and provide guidance in difficult cases⁵. Ultimately, our role as patient advocates requires us to listen, educate, and support our patients in making informed decisions. By fostering open communication and understanding, we can navigate these ethical dilemmas with compassion and integrity. #HealthcareEthics #PatientAdvocacy #MedicalEthics #InformedConsent #HealthcareProfessionals

Something to think about: How do we, as case managers, ensure each person is heard, included, and belongs as a healthcare team member? This is a question from Dr. Ellen Fink Samnick, who is hosting a webinar today from CMSA in honor of CM Week. WEBINAR: Advancing DEIB and Health Equity in Professional Case Management Practice Presented by Michael Garrett, MS, CCM, CVE & Ellen Fink-Samnick, DBH, MSW, LCSW, ACSW, CCM, CCTP, CRP, FCM. If you missed it, you can catch it in the replay! https://lnkd.in/gGdDzNFv

Communication is paramount in the medical field, as evidenced by its prominent role in the recent panel discussion on the evolving landscape of ethics, empathy, and professionalism in medical practice. For healthcare professionals, clear and effective communication with patients and their families is vital throughout the diagnostic and treatment process.  The panel also emphasised the importance of ethical conduct and professional behaviour in all aspects of patient care. #TeamFNU #CMNHS #PacificHealth #HealthSymposium

Discover the essentials of informed consent in clinical trials in our latest blog post. Understand the process, the importance of Legally Acceptable Representatives (LAR), and the role of Impartial Witnesses (IW). Make informed decisions about your health. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/g7rg_3sB #clinicalresearch #clinicaltrails #artemishospitals #artemisclinicalresearch

🌟 The Importance of Ethics and Values in Delivering Quality Clinical Services 🌟 In the realm of healthcare, the delivery of quality clinical services goes beyond advanced technology and medical expertise—it is grounded in strong ethical principles and core values. Ethics and values create the foundation for trust, accountability, and empathy in patient care, ensuring that every individual receives respectful, fair, and compassionate treatment. Why are ethics and values so crucial? • Patient Trust and Safety: Ethical standards prioritize patient welfare and safety, fostering trust in the healthcare system. • Decision-Making: Values guide clinical decisions, especially in complex situations where medical choices intersect with patient rights and well-being. • Team Cohesion and Culture: A healthcare team that shares common values can create a culture of mutual respect, collaboration, and continuous improvement. • Equitable Care: Ethics uphold the principle of equity, ensuring that all patients receive care regardless of background, promoting inclusivity and reducing disparities. As healthcare professionals, integrating these values into practice is not just an ideal but a necessity for sustaining quality and excellence in clinical services. Let’s commit to embedding ethical values into every layer of patient care to build a stronger, more reliable healthcare system. #Healthcare #Ethics #Values #ClinicalServices #QualityCare #PatientFirst