John D Reiser, C.P.M.’s Post

I agree with u John. I too believe Daggett is itching to strike. Adam, not certain what u are referring to as additional consumer costs passed along by carriers. There is no direct connection btw labor (terminal) costs and consumer. Shipping rates will not go up due to labor costs as carriers have contracts with terminals over a period of time. It wud b like a super market saying they will increase food costs because minimum wage has gone up. Though carriers do own some terminals they are silos as separate companies. In many cases, it is the stevadores that pay the labor. And in fact, the largest terminal operators are non affiliated with carriers. Operators like Hutchison, PSA and DP World. My thoughts....

There’s a possibility that the ILA strike will begin anew in January. Is your supply chain ready? At 3rdwave, we offer a platform that helps: - Plan for disruptions - Understand their impact across your business - Keep your supply chain moving forward as others are struggling Whether a new ILA strike develops in January or not, we now live in an era of constant disruption. Our technology helps you overcome these disruptions so you can build a competitive advantage. Learn more here: https://lnkd.in/e8p7et_Z #shipping #import #export #supplychain #internationalshipping #logistics #freight #cargo #transportation

🚢 A lot of commentators are betting on the US port strikes to resurface as a major disruption come January 16th. 🗽For an economy as vast and influential as the US, and with the rapid growth of our industry, it’s astonishing to see such a vital sector choosing to operate with technology that feels like it belongs to a bygone era. ⏳ 💼 The chronic underinvestment in modern port infrastructure doesn’t just drag down efficiency; it places immense strain on global supply chains that rely on the steady flow of goods through US ports. 🌎 While ports worldwide are embracing automation and digital solutions to keep up with demand, the US risks becoming the weak link in the chain, a costly bottleneck in the global trade ecosystem. 💸⛔ ⚙️ In an age where technological advancement drives competitiveness, it’s clear that union concerns over job security are paying a significant role in holding back necessary progress. 🤝 Yet, as other major ports prove, there are ways to balance innovation with workforce protections, ensuring both resilience in global trade and a future-ready workforce. 🔄 US ports are like that mate who rocks up to a BBQ hours late and wonders why all the snags are gone!! 🍖⏳

BREAKING: The contract was rejected by 96% of the rank and file. As of now, the union is on strike. The strike affects about 33,000 hourly employees, but there will be further effects the longer the strike lasts. It looks likely that the Machinists union will vote to reject the contract with Boeing tomorrow. If they do, the strike will begin at 12:01 am Friday morning. Several impressions I get from the linked article: 1.There is still a lot of resentment in the union against the poor leadership in the company. A common sentiment is, "Why should we have to continue to make sacrifices to help recover from the poor decisions that leadership made in the past?" 2. At least one union member expects the US government will bailout Boeing should a lengthy strike put the Company in a precarious financial position. 3. This is not the first time this has happened, but rumor and misunderstanding seem to be behind some of the union members' resentment.

Boeing is facing a potential strike by its machinist union, the largest representing 32,000 workers who assemble planes in Washington State. As negotiations for a new contract begin, tensions are high, and many industry observers expect a strike. The union is pushing for significant demands, including a 40% pay raise, the restoration of pension plans, and a seat on Boeing's board. These negotiations come at a time when Boeing is already under increased scrutiny following a series of production issues and quality concerns. A strike could severely disrupt Boeing’s plans to ramp up plane deliveries, a critical move for the company's financial recovery. The situation is further complicated by Boeing's new CEO, Kelly Ortberg, who faces the challenge of mending relationships with workers and restoring confidence in the company. The machinists' union has significant leverage due to skilled labor shortages and long-standing resentment over past contract negotiations that resulted in stagnant wages and reduced benefits. Union members are determined to push for substantial changes, including improved pay, better working conditions, and more control over company decisions. Boeing, on the other hand, seems prepared to meet some of the union's demands but may resist others, such as the demand for board representation and guarantees on future plane production locations. The outcome of these negotiations is uncertain, but both sides are prepared for a tough battle. A strike could have severe financial consequences for Boeing, potentially delaying production and further damaging the company's already fragile financial situation. **Jeremy Bogaisky, Forbes Staff** If you have enjoyed this article summary I invite you to please connect with me on Linkedin by sending me a connection request. John Keith King

This is the eighth strike by machinests in Boeing’s 108-year history — it comes as the company faces intense regulatory scrutiny, production delays, quality issues and increasing debt. Historically machinists strikes at Boeing average about 50 days, the last one 57 days taking Boeing 2 years to recover, however the machinest walked away with very little to show for two months off the job. Back then in 2008, Boeing had record profits and a record backlog of orders exceeding 3000 aircraft. The company back then threatened to shut production in Washington state and move it east. Should the company decide they can’t afford to make previous threats stick, can’t afford the effects of lost productivity, can’t afford their stock price dropping more, can’t afford another layer of struggle in its current recovery from production delays and can’t afford its credit rating to tank if the strike is prolonged making borrowing or raising debt more difficult, then one would bet that this strike will be shortened.

Boeing and the International Association of Machinists have announced that talks have broken down in the ongoing strike, with no new negotiations scheduled. The strike, which began on September 13, has already cost the company $1 billion a month, according to Standard & Poor's. The IAM's statement blames Boeing for not making an offer that would be acceptable to its members, who are demanding the reinstatement of their traditional pension plan. The union's surveys show that the offer of an immediate 12% raise and total raises of 30% over the four-year life of the contract is not acceptable to members. Boeing, on the other hand, says it made new and improved proposals to try to reach a compromise, including increases in take-home pay and retirement. However, the union argues that Boeing refused to improve the publicly disclosed offer of two weeks ago. This strike comes at a time when Boeing is struggling financially, with two fatal crashes leading to a 20-month grounding of its best-selling jet, the 737 Max, and core operating losses totaling more than $33 billion. What are your thoughts on this ongoing strike and its potential impact on Boeing's future? Do you think the union's demands are reasonable, or is Boeing justified in its position?

☄️Boeing Is Losing $100 Million To $150 Million A Day Due To Union Strike ⏺Boeing is caught between a rock and a hard place as the strike between it and the International Association of Machinists (IAM) union continues into its second week. ⏺On Monday, September 23, Boeing increased its offer to the union, which represents 33,000 workers. However, the company did not approach the union leadership, but instead sent its “best and final” proposal directly to the workers, which did not please the IAM. ⏺Boeing's latest offer raised wages to 30% from 25% in the previous offer, doubled the signing bonus to $6,000 and increased 401k contributions, among other things. However, as was the case with the first offer, participants remained uninterested in the company's latest offer, which was sent out through the media. ⏺Boeing's insistence on reaching out directly to union members speaks to the challenges the company faces. Boeing is already forced to conduct a significant reassessment of its financial performance. Every day Boeing goes on strike, they lose between $100 million and $150 million. ⏺Without union members working at Boeing's assembly plant in Renton, Washington, the company will be unable to deliver its cash cow, the 737 Max jet. Boeing can still supply its 787 Dreamliners from its nonunion South Carolina plant, but the number of the planes is limited. Boeing delivered 70 737 Max planes in the second quarter, but only nine of its larger Dreamliners.

Sharing this opinion as my own thoughts. Whether 5 days or more on strike it is evident that there will be a strike. Biden has been an absentee President since November, there's 5 days right there. It's clear this issue will not not get solved on day 6. Although I must admit it seems as if Trump has been running things she never November anyway! Question is, how long will this standoff last? = How much damage will be caused? What is certain, shipping costs will rise rapidly, port efficiency will continue to lag all other major trading nations. And upward pressure on inflation will return. The other only thing that will be reshored will be higher costs for the US lower and middle classes. So really, who wins here? Americans loose, the carriers simply pass on the costs and 45,000 ILA votes go to Trump. Seems like an expensive bill to pay for that kind of ROI. Happy New Year to all!  https://lnkd.in/dCq62ryJ