Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions’ Post

No Respect for the Constitution! Harris is a woman (can I say that?) who has NO respect for our Constitutional rights! Take a look at these videos where she talks about just forcing her way into the homes of legal gun owners to see how they store weapons! Can you say unreasonable search and seizure? Harris goes on to say that she thinks forceful gun confiscation is a good idea, and if Congress doesn’t act in a potential Harris 100 days - she would use executive action to try to seize guns! She is absolutely nutty! The Second Amendment is a part of the Constitution. Marbury v. Madison (1803) stated, “Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” This 1803 decision by the SCOTUS would make any such Executive Order Null and Void! Harris must have skipped Constitutional law at law school. The people who are supporting this woman are condoning socialism, or an outright Communist takeover of the USA. You can count me as one who will never support this. As a military veteran, I swore an oath to protect the Constitution against all enemies. Foreign and Domestic. It seems, right now, the domestic enemies are outnumbering the foreign enemies. And before you ask … Yes, I know all about the unconstitutional “Fusion Centers” tracking American citizens like a homegrown KGB! One opinion.

It shouldn’t be MONUMENTAL. It’s about time, and proper, that “shall not be infringed” actually gets the recognition that was originally intended. From the decision: “If public carry necessarily extends beyond the home such that an individual may lawfully bear a firearm in a public place, commonsense dictates that the Constitution’s protections cannot simply evaporate whenever a vehicle is required to travel between the two” and resultantly, “the court cannot countenance an interpretation whereby those protections extend only as far as an individual can travel by foot. We therefore conclude that the conveyance of firearms in motor vehicles is conduct protected by the Second Amendment.” Bottom line is… this is the correct and EXPECTED proper Constitutional outcome. Other UnConstitutional laws, rules and regs in other liberal States and other progressive cities have been placed on notice.

Summary Federal Firearm In Possession Case Memorandum,18 U.S.C. § 922- Current caselaw synopsis from Congressional Research Service, Dave S. Sidhu, Legislative Attorney, current and dated July 8, 2024- This 6 page memorandum provides the current state of affairs with important federal firearm possession cases, together with a brief description of each. You may find this useful with any federal 'in possession case'. This is considered a United States Work and is not subject to copyright. Mr. Sidhu did a nice job with this summary memo. For that reason we thought we'd share it with you. https://lnkd.in/ehj9VkKW #cja #federaldefender #federaljudges #judges #federalattorney #attorney #mitigationspecialist #mitigation #feloninpossession #firststepact #secondchanceact #convictedfelon #ussc #carltonreeves #liberty #constitution #constitutionalrights #conflictoflaws #firearms #nra #18USC922 #defender #sentencingreform #criminaljusticereform #18USC3553 #sentencingguidelines #federalsentencingalliance #ushouse #ussenate #congress

RHODES CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT LIST OF THE DAY - Compromising civil liberties and property rights to prevent acts of violence that have yet to occur are policies more suited for dystopian thrillers⁠—and police states⁠—than a free society. Red Flag laws are in the news again. These laws, also called “extreme risk protection orders,” allow courts to issue orders allowing law enforcement to seize firearms from people who’ve committed no crime but are believed to be a danger to themselves or others. Here are seven reasons red flag laws should be opposed, particularly at the federal level. 1. There’s No Evidence Red Flag Laws Reduce Gun Violence 2. Congress Lacks the Authority 3. We Have Federalism 4. Red Flag Laws Violate Due Process 5. Red Flag Laws Could Lead to More Violence 6. It’s Not Just the “Mentally Ill” and Grave Threats Who Are Flagged 7. They’re Basically Pre-Crime Passionate About US Politics? Follow Me Lee Newton Rhodes Interested In Your Thoughts.

Time to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court! Firearms Policy Coalition and FPC Action Foundation have filed a response to the government's petition asking the Supreme Court hear our challenge to ATF's "Frame or Receiver" Rule. The kicker? We agree that the Supreme Court should take the case! But that is where the agreement ends... Now is the time for the Court to step in and affirm our victories at both the District Court and the Fifth Circuit. ATF's Rule is nothing more than an unconstitutional and unlawful attempt to rewrite federal law through agency rulemaking. But Congress is charged with making federal law, not executive branch agencies such as ATF. The Supreme Court should put this Rule exactly where it belongs--in the dustbin of history. https://lnkd.in/eVjHiQbE

Tonkon Torp LLP's Will Gent and Mick Harris write: Last month, in Wolford v. Lopez, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision with implications on commercial property owners’ rights to restrict firearms on private property. Interpreting the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent “history and tradition” approach to the Second Amendment, the court set serious limits on state authority to ban #firearms in public locations and highlighted the tension between Second Amendment rights and property ownership. #commercialproperties #realestate #gunowners #gunlaws #propertylaw

New gun laws are currently active in the State of Michigan. Please read the below article for specific details and my opinion on the new legislation. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

On Friday, Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon signed a bill into law that bars state and local officials from enforcing federal “extreme risk” protective orders – sometimes referred to as red flag laws. Titled “Prohibit Red Flag Gun Seizure Act,” the new law prohibits any state or local agency “from implementing or enforcing any federal statute, rule, executive order, judicial order or judicial findings or any state statute, rule, executive order, judicial order or judicial findings that would enforce a red flag gun seizure order against or upon a resident of Wyoming” who is legally allowed to possess a firearm under state law. It also prohibits the state and its political subdivisions from using personnel or funds for enforcement of the same. No governmental entities in the state are allowed to accept federal grant funding to implement any federal red flag law. Anyone found in violation of the law by a court will now be subject to a civil penalty of up to $50,000 fifty per violation, and the court “may order any injunctive or other equitable relief as permitted by law.” On March 6, the House passed SF109 by a 54-8 vote with some technical amendments. The following day, the Senate concurred with the House amendments by a 30-0 vote. With Gov. Gordon’s signature, the law went into immediate effect. https://lnkd.in/gXATxexv

Major changes could be on the horizon for Arizona's gun laws concerning minors. Stay ahead of the curve with Millar Law, where we analyze what these potential legal shifts mean for you and your family ➡️ https://lnkd.in/em67wCTe #GunLaw #ArizonaLegislation #AZLaw #MillarLaw

Second Amendment rights and weapons charges can be complicated in Maryland. Alpert Schreyer Trial Attorneys is committed to protecting your constitutional rights and defending you against unjust charges. Let us help you navigate the legal landscape. Contact us today. #SecondAmendment #WeaponsCharges #LegalDefense #MarylandLaw #AlpertSchreyerLaw