Jon Janego’s Post

When I joined AWS in 2021, one of my main motivations for doing so was that Amazon seemed to be taking a progressive approach to hiring distributed teams, and I could work for them without having to uproot my 20+ year life in Chicago. I feel privileged to have been part of a team led by Harry Mower that intentionally took that approach to hiring, and at one point we had 100+ teammates working together across the globe to build a major new product. It's disappointing to see Amazon undo this hiring strategy with their new "5 days in the office" policy. Not only will this affect the people who were hired as "remote" / not in a "hub" location, forcing them to make the choice of relocating to keep doing the job they've done for years, or to leave... but in my opinion, it'll also put Amazon at a competitive disadvantage by limiting their talent pool to only those in (or willing to move to) specific locations. They had a chance to do better... and instead have doubled down on acting like remote work and distributed teams are a liability, not an asset.

Eugene Y A.

Advocate for intuitive, accessible, inclusive design | Building Hardware | Software | Firmware | Gamer | User Experience

3mo

Thanks for your insights Jon Janego I originally joined as a virtual. That said, I go in 5 days a week. 1. To get out of the house 2. To socialize 3. To create a barrier between work and home 4. Unless on-call, laptop is shut outside of 8:30-5:30 Yes WFH was great. Until work bled into life and vice versa. I’m wondering what fallout will happen com January. Planned obsolescence? I’m curious to see the adoption to adhere to a 40h week Thoughts?

Alexander Galushka

Sr. Engineering Manager @ServiceNow

3mo

It’s a two-way door decision for Amazon.

Srbo Icelic

Building Resilient GRC Programs | Risk Management & Compliance Expert | Strengthening Security & Privacy for Modern Organizations

3mo

Spot on, Jon. Like many large organizations, they are effectively transferring the financial burden of their real estate assets onto remote employees, which in turn creates new human capital risks. They need to justify the ongoing costs of maintaining their physical office spaces, many of which may be difficult, if not impossible, to liquidate in today’s macroeconomic climate. To these organizations, forcing a return to office seems to be their only viable solution

I think the key here is that Amazon is embracing the "big company" culture, and trying to shed the vestiges of having a results-focused startup mentality. And yes, there's quite a large amount of irony with Jassy laughably pitching this top-down feelings-driven mandate as somehow related to strengthening their previous culture. The previous culture is why I took a job there; the new Jassy culture is why I left.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics