JooYeun Chang’s Post

View profile for JooYeun Chang, graphic

Championing Child Welfare | Public Policy Expert | Driving Positive Outcomes through Philanthropy

Today, I had the honor of testifying to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance to provide comments on the critical role of the Family First Prevention Services Act in child welfare. We offered our considerations: 1)    Clarify who is eligible for Family First interventions to include children and families who are at risk of child welfare involvement and ensure that services are delivered, and efficacy measured in a way that is humane and promotes program utilization.   2)    Expand the scope of eligible prevention services to include services and support to address interpersonal violence, system navigation and care coordination, and material and concrete support for families.  Abuse or neglect that causes children serious and immediate harm requires child protection intervention. But often neglect cases and child well-being concerns are tied to poverty, in combination with other risk factors, including mental health. This requires a voluntary response, based on family needs and strengths, and of the community.

Testimony of JooYeun Chang, Director of Child Well-being at DDF, Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance — DDF Opt-In

Testimony of JooYeun Chang, Director of Child Well-being at DDF, Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance — DDF Opt-In

ddf-opt-in.org

Mike Leach

State Director at South Carolina Department of Social Services

7mo

Great work.

Like
Reply
Aubrey Edwards-Luce

Executive Director, Center for Families, Children and the Courts @ University of Baltimore School of Law | Child Welfare & Youth Justice | Policy Advocate | Coalition Builder | Leader | Anti-Racism | Led by Lived Experts

7mo

Congrats on a job well done! And thank you so much for making it plain!! It was so encouraging to watch you in action.

I am re-reading your comments, Joo. You articulated well the key measures to move our system to support families, not to "report" or punish. You, furthermore, have courageously called for legislative changes to FFPSA, not just asking ACF to do more. We concur wholeheartedly. Communities should be able to identify populations most in need of services and should be required to evaluate the efficacy of services offered. FFPSA must be amended, however, to allow more access for states to employ models with proven "applied science" bases WHILE exciting demonstrations are implemented and measured, such as OPT-In for Families. This could be done by broadening access to IV-E prevention funds to "supported" (and "promising"?) models, along with the requisite state reporting and current CQI measures. Let the proof be in the implementation! The alternative is that families remain unserved and/or underserved. Those of us on this mission to "reform" child welfare need the vision and courage you demonstrate, and we need safe options based on implementation science, not just controlled studies. As you succinctly stated, we need improvements to the legislation NOW.

Clarifying eligibility for Family First can improve access and outcomes.

Like
Reply

Excellent points on expanding prevention services. Addressing poverty is key.

Like
Reply
Katherine Jones

Former Crisis Counselor

7mo

Well done! Thank you for doing this important work!

Barbara Needell

Child Welfare Administrative Data Support

7mo

❤️

VANNESSA DORANTES

Managing Director Systems Improvement Casey Family Programs *Opinions expressed are my own.

7mo

Yes yes and YES!

Clare Anderson, MSW

Senior Policy Fellow at Chapin Hall

7mo

Concrete supports! And a terrific set of recommendations overall to meet the needs of families from a true prevention frame!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics