"Acemoglu envisions three ways the AI story could play out in coming years. The first — and by far most benign — scenario calls for the hype to slowly cool and investments in “modest” uses of the technology to take hold. In the second scenario, the frenzy builds for another year or so, leading to a tech stock crash that leaves investors, executives and students disillusioned with the technology. “AI spring followed by AI winter,” he calls this one. The third — and scariest — scenario is that the mania goes unchecked for years, leading companies to cut scores of jobs and pump hundreds of billions of dollars into AI “without understanding what they’re going to do with it,” only to be left scrambling to try to rehire workers when the technology doesn’t pan out. “Now there are widespread negative outcomes for the whole economy.” The most likely? https://lnkd.in/gmiMWZy6
Krishna Joshi’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
#FOMO on #AI? What is your take from the possible outcome by Acemoglu envisions three ways the AI story could play out in coming years. 👉🏻 The first — and by far most benign — scenario calls for the hype to slowly cool and investments in “modest” uses of the technology to take hold. 👉🏻 In the second scenario, the frenzy builds for another year or so, leading to a tech stock crash that leaves investors, executives and students disillusioned with the technology. “AI spring followed by AI winter,” he calls this one. 👉🏻 The third — and scariest — scenario is that the mania goes unchecked for years, leading companies to cut scores of jobs and pump hundreds of billions of dollars into AI “without understanding what they’re going to do with it,” only to be left scrambling to try to rehire workers when the technology doesn’t pan out. “Now there are widespread negative outcomes for the whole economy.” https://lnkd.in/gp23qFzA
AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash
bloomberg.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Why does co-director Daron Acemoglu believe AI is unlikely to live up to the investor hype? "As promising as AI may be, there’s little chance it will live up to that hype, Acemoglu says. By his calculation, only a small percent of all jobs — a mere 5% — is ripe to be taken over, or at least heavily aided, by AI over the next decade. Good news for workers, true, but very bad for the companies sinking billions into the technology expecting it to drive a surge in productivity." Read more in Bloomberg: https://lnkd.in/eaKGCRz2
AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash
bloomberg.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I have mixed feelings about the conclusions of how fast AI will be able to augment/replace workers. We're definitely a ways away from 'replacement,' but we are in the stage of the cycle where those who experiment can increase productivity and I firmly believe that those companies experimenting and learning now will 'get there' faster... wherever 'there' is. The key question is this: which AI (all permutations of AI) platforms will be able to financially hang until the benefits and value of augmentation (AI assistants and agent support) and replacement (AI agent autonomy) are realized. Speaking with Bloomberg this month, Acemoglu estimated that only about 5% of jobs have the potential to be replaced or heavily aided by AI in the next decade. “A lot of money is going to get wasted,” he said. “You’re not going to get an economic revolution out of that 5%.”
AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash
bloomberg.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Very true comment: AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash Why? - Artificial Intelligence is another layer on top of your existing data - Dirty data and years of custom processes can choke AI negating benefits - Experienced analytics groups already know where to pinpoint your long-term enterprise data problems; use their knowledge with AI implementations Epic Systems does a great job at structuring the underlying data especially with its pre-built generative AI, but beware 3rd party input as it may not be dependable for your AI implementation. https://lnkd.in/g_eSFxzS
AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash
bloomberg.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Are we really ready for the AI age? Sam Altman, dropped a blog post that’s got the world buzzing—but not everyone’s feeling optimistic. Altman is unapologetically positive about AI’s impact on humanity, but he doesn’t dig deep enough into the risks. And that’s the problem. Here’s the reality check: We’re talking about AI reaching superintelligence in less than 8 years. Soon, we’ll have AI agents that act autonomously—doing jobs like human assistants, but without the paychecks or lunch breaks. Altman even claims the poorest person in the future will live better than the richest today. Sounds crazy, right? But let’s not forget, we’ve already seen wild shifts in history. But here’s where it gets serious. Bigger data centers, larger AI models, and a pathway to superintelligence—it all sounds exciting until we realize we might end up fighting wars over this tech. AI won’t just disrupt industries; it could redefine global power structures. If AI doesn’t become as cheap and accessible as water = we’re heading into dangerous territory. So what’s the solution? Altman is right—focus on the economic risks now, before it’s too late. AI could create jobs we can’t even imagine yet. But let’s make sure it doesn’t leave entire populations behind while we chase the dream of a tech-driven utopia. The future is coming faster than we think. Are we preparing fast enough?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
2. As AI reshapes industries, finance offers a glimpse into our future. AI has revolutionized asset management and quantitative investing, creating winners and losers almost overnight. Yet, areas like wealth management and lending remain largely human-driven, reminding us that AI's impact varies by sector. Finance also shows that scale matters in an AI-driven world—bigger players with more data and computing power will thrive. But there's a risk: over-relying on fast data could lead us to overlook softer, more nuanced insights. As AI advances, the greatest value will come from balancing technology with human judgment and long-term vision. https://lnkd.in/gmbauxw4 #ai #finance #claytonshum #futureofwork #innovation #technology #industrytrends #techtrends
What the Finance Industry Tells Us About the Future of AI
hbr.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This MIT professor's prediction flies in the face of surveys and anecdotes that I've read/heard. What do you think? Excerpts: "As promising as AI may be, there’s little chance it will live up to that hype, Acemoglu says. By his calculation, only a small percent of all jobs — a mere 5% — is ripe to be taken over, or at least heavily aided, by AI over the next decade." "He points to reliability issues and a lack of human-level wisdom or judgment, which will make people unlikely to outsource many white-collar jobs to AI anytime soon." #AI #ArtificialIntelligence
AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash
bloomberg.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Daron Acemoglu[, an Institute Professor, the highest title for faculty at MIT,] wants to make clear right away that he has nothing against artificial intelligence. He gets the potential. 'I’m not an AI pessimist,' he declares seconds into an interview. ... By his calculation, only a small percent of all jobs — a mere 5% — is ripe to be taken over, or at least heavily aided, by AI over the next decade. Good news for workers, true, but very bad for the companies sinking billions into the technology expecting it to drive a surge in productivity. 'A lot of money is going to get wasted,' says Acemoglu. 'You’re not going to get an economic revolution out of that 5%.' ... Acemoglu envisions three ways the AI story could play out in coming years. • The first — and by far most benign — scenario calls for the hype to slowly cool and investments in ‘modest’ uses of the technology to take hold. • In the second scenario, the frenzy builds for another year or so, leading to a tech stock crash that leaves investors, executives and students disillusioned with the technology. ‘AI spring followed by AI winter,’ he calls this one. • The third — and scariest — scenario is that the mania goes unchecked for years, leading companies to cut scores of jobs and pump hundreds of billions of dollars into AI ‘without understanding what they’re going to do with it,’ only to be left scrambling to try to rehire workers when the technology doesn’t pan out. ‘Now there are widespread negative outcomes for the whole economy.’ The most likely? He figures it’s some combination of the second and third scenarios. Inside C-suites, there’s just too much fear of missing out on the AI boom to envision the hype machine slowing down any time soon, he says, and 'when the hype gets intensified, the fall is unlikely to be soft.' ... Today’s large language models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT are impressive in many respects, Acemoglu says. So why can’t they replace humans, or at least help them a lot, at many jobs? He points to reliability issues and a lack of human-level wisdom or judgment, which will make people unlikely to outsource many white-collar jobs to AI anytime soon. Nor is AI going to be able to automate physical jobs like construction or janitorial, he says. 'You need highly reliable information or the ability of these models to faithfully implement certain steps that previously workers were doing,' he said. 'They can do that in a few places with some human supervisory oversight' — like coding — 'but in most places they cannot.' 'That’s a reality check for where we are right now,' he said.” Jeran Wittenstein, AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash • Daron Acemoglu doesn’t see how AI lives up to all the hype • “You’re not going to get an economic revolution,” he says 𝘉𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘨, 2 October 2024, https://lnkd.in/gtevsQAP
AI Can Only Do 5% of Jobs, Says MIT Economist Who Fears Crash
bloomberg.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI is a massive crash in the making. That’s the potential takeaway from Daron Acemoglu, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. As promising as AI may be, there’s little chance it will live up to Wall Street’s hype hype, he warns. By his calculation, only a small percentage of all jobs—a mere 5%—is ripe to be taken over, or at least heavily aided, by AI over the next decade. Good news for workers, true, but very bad for the companies sinking billions into the technology expecting it to drive a surge in productivity.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI is effectively useless. . . If so, it begs the question. . ."To AI or Not To AI. . .?" James Ferguson, founding partner of MacroStrategy Partnership, puts it bluntly: "AI still remains, I would argue, completely unproven. And fake it till you make it may work in Silicon Valley, but for the rest of us, I think once bitten twice shy may be more appropriate for AI." Ferguson's concerns are echoed by the fact that LLMs often "hallucinate", inventing facts, sources, and more. Moreover, AI's energy consumption and unproven ROI are significant limitations that can't be ignored. But here's the thing: some AI companies getting funding today are just "lipstick on a pig." They're dressing up familiar ideas or incremental improvements on pre-built LLMs as revolutionary breakthroughs. And that means a lot of investor money will be lost when the bubble bursts Ferguson notes, "If AI cannot be trusted... then AI is effectively, in my mind, useless." Let's not forget that the dot-com bubble burst, and many investors were left with significant losses. But will we repeat similar mistakes with AI? While AI has made tremendous progress, we need to separate the hype from reality. LLMs and generative AI have a ways to go before they deliver real value to businesses and society. Does that mean AI is useless? Or that we are in a bubble? There will certainly be a lot of money lost due to bad investents – but every innovator knows, technology takes time to take hold. . . Let's take a step back, breathe, and focus on the fundamentals. The next wave of innovation will come from those who can harness AI's potential while addressing its limitations. #innovation #future #futureofai #AI #LLMs #GenerativeAI #DotCom #Hype #RealityCheck
AI is effectively ‘useless'—and it's created a ‘fake it till you make it’ bubble that could end in disaster, veteran market watcher warns
fortune.com
To view or add a comment, sign in