Jean-Pierre Gattuso’s Post

The ten themes addressed by the One Ocean Science Congress are diverse. Below are the topics that will be covered under theme 1 « Integrating knowledge systems, with a focus on responsibility and respect for the ocean ». https://lnkd.in/edqkVQtf #OOSC Ifremer CNRS

🌊 Final Call for Abstracts: One Ocean Science 2025! 🌍 The call for abstracts for the One Ocean Science 2025 Conference closes on 14th November: https://lnkd.in/djxt3PAy CNRS and Ifremer have been tasked with organizing the Congress (OOSC), a UNOC3 Special Event dedicated to #science, and to provide Heads of State, Government, and the broader society, with comprehensive scientific insights on the Ocean's health and future trajectory. For more: https://lnkd.in/djxt3PAy 🌐 #OneOceanScience2025 #EarthObservation #OceanScience #Sustainability

Friday afternoons are tough, aren't they? I will try to make one of them better. Join me on December 6 for the PLOS Open 2.0 webinar series. In this episode, I will ask our speakers about their vision for Open Science policies for the future. Bring coffee, bring an open mind and take part in this free-flow discussion. No slides, just a meaty discussion.

What drives the acceptance and success of Open Science policies? In this webinar, Open Science practitioners will share their insights, experiences, and critiques on what works—and what doesn’t. Join this fireside-chat-style discussion—definitely not one to miss!

"As a scientist I'm bringing the objective and the scientific part of the project [...]. Before restoring we have to know where and what to restore and this is based on scientific research" — Lorenzo Bramanti, Researcher CNRS, Laboratoire d'écogéochimie des environnements benthiques (LECOB/CNRS-Sorbonne Université). We have collected short statements from OCEAN CITIZEN Partners explaining their vision of the project in the first year of work. Learn more details on our website, and find all the interviews on our YouTube channel! ▶️ https://lnkd.in/dKXtyc42 #OceanCitizen #MissionOcean #HorizonEU #GenerationRestoration

Cooperation in science is key to better results and better understanding. Knowledge sharing, open discussions and joint challenges is a basis for this cooperation. Transatlantic science cooperation was and is important. How can and will this last in the future? One of the questions the big Transatlantic Science Conference addresses. To find out more: https://lnkd.in/ekbYQqj9 #sciencecooperation Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft / Helmholtz Association Carnegie Science

PART 2: Learn more about Soshichiro Nagano, PhD's research and check out what he shows us about the light-reaction center of a phytochrome in our new #MPIMRSpotlight!👀

Canada’s Chief Science Advisor, Mona Nemer, has announced the release of a public UFO report, a bold initiative promoting transparency and furthering research in aerial phenomena. This represents a significant opportunity for the scientific community and the public to engage in understanding the unexplained. Learn more about this groundbreaking development. #UFOs #CanadianScience #PublicDisclosure #ResearchAndDevelopment 🔗 https://lnkd.in/gmsqKJx4 #ProfessionalExploration #InnovationInScience #LeadersInScience #GlobalResearch #InterdisciplinaryResearch #PublicEngagement #ScientificOutreach #PolicyAndScience #TechnologyTrends

https://lnkd.in/gGgEUihc Finally, here is the peer-reviewed version of my paper "Electro-gravity entanglement" that just came out in the Kragujevac Journal of Science. Essentially, I show how gravitational attraction can be a form of electrical attraction. Below I present the reviewers comments. Reviewers comment: In presented article, author has considered model for unification of Newtonian gravity with electromagnetic force. This unification is based on quantum entanglement, where multiple discreetly charged wave packets which are entangled simulate gravitational force. In essence, author claims that Newtonian gravity is a macroscopic entanglement formed from superposition of all opposite polarity states. This model was entirely built from tree axioms. From here it has been shown how to obtain effective electro-gravity charge for both wave packet and set of wave packets. It has also been show how change of effective electro-gravity charge of particle changes its gravitational mass, in effect changing gravitational attraction, which leads to variation in magnitude of gravitational force. This change in effective electro-gravity charge can be obtained by only changing polarity of wave packets which form the state. In second half of the article, author proposed experiment for testing this model. Experiment is similar to the splitting of spin 1/2 fermions in non-homogeneous magnetic field. Here we have constant electric field, through which neutrons are passed. After passing through region that contains electric field, neutrons are allowed to spread feely for some additional period of time. Based on effective electro-gravity charge of neutron, if starting hypotheses are true, there should be greater splitting of neutron beam then what uncertainty relation predicts. While there could be further philosophical debate whether starting set of axioms is good, there is no debate that results that have been obtained in this article are correctly deduced from given axioms. With this in mind, I give this article a favorable report and recommend it for publication.

Why is our world made by matter? and where is antimatter? https://lnkd.in/etrYjtRr Answer: Actually, there is no imballance between "matter" and "antimatter" in the universe. In the 1920's Dirac defined negative charge elementary particle "electron" as "matter" and its positive charge antiparticle "positron" as "antimatter". A few years later in the early 1930's Anderson experimentally discovered that electromagnetic photons of energy in excess of 1.022 MeV (twice the energy of the electron rest mass) decoupled to become an electron and positron pair moving separately in space when such a photon is destabilized by coming too close to a massive particle such as an atomic nucleus. Later, in the second half of the 1960's, it was experimentally established at the Stanford Linear Accelerator (SLAC) that protons and neutrons were each made of a mix of elementary charged and massive particles, 2 positive charges and 1 negative charge for the proton and 1 positive charge and 2 negative charges for the neutron. It turns out that these elementary charges can only be electrons and positrons whose normal charge and mass characteristics are warped into these altered states by the intensity of the local electromagnetic environment. Consequently, there is an equal number of matter and antimatter elementary particles in the universe. All positrons simply are within the nucleons of all atoms. Put in perspective in this recently published article: https://lnkd.in/eW9FpVwg Also available here in other languages: From E=mc2 in normal space to E=m0cIcK in the complex config... #matter #antimatter #physics #astrophysics