Justinas Kairys’ Post

View profile for Justinas Kairys

Founder, CTO @Opendatabay | Advisor | AI, Data, DLT Consultant

We should talk about the big elephant in the room. The job market for junior software developers is facing some tough challenges. With large language models like Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI tools like Copilot and Cursor, many traditional entry-level coding tasks are now automated. These tools can often complete code snippets, debug, and even build simple applications 50 times faster and better than any junior developer or 2 of them. A sad reality, many companies are rethinking their staffing strategies, with some deciding if it's easier (and cheaper) to rely on a $19.99 AI monthly subscription rather than to hire and train junior talent. I've been in junior developer shoes myself, and compared to people who are seriously good at coding - I still feel like one. Being junior is about working on boring tasks that nobody has time for, breaking things and asking questions, but most importantly bringing a fresh perspective to the company, new energy and fun. It feels like we losing these folks, and future pipeline of talented software engineers might be jeopardised.

  • text, letter
Des Tapaki

Operations and Delivery expert | Navigating complex challenges to enable organisational growth and impact

4mo

How will you get senior software engineers in the future if you don’t have any juniors now? 🧐

>  build simple applications 50 times faster and better than any junior developer or 2 of them. I disagree. Well, I am irrelevant, I know. But if your juniors really are THAT BAD that they can't outbeat any of those artificial idiots you named (those that make mistake after mistake and don't even realize what a complete BS they fabricate), you definitely need to look for other juniors. You probably are correct that the idiots in suits don't know anything either and believe that they can now put a monkey without brain in front of a computer and just run one of those artificial morones and get nice results. The idiots in suits, however, are probably too uneducated to know the front of the computer from its ass. Or from theirs, for that matter. Irony aside: If your juniors aren't better in solving problems than the unbelievably BAD STUPID claude or the always-lying chatGPT, you have a real problem at hands. CODING. Yeah, that's a different game. Coding is for idiots and you are correct in that artificial idiots are faster than human idiots in writing code that nobody wants to support after the fact.

Like
Reply
Loay Moamen

Machine learning engineer at Block (Tidal)

3mo

I can provide a different alternative and say we're entering the age of expert begginers, were junior people with the use of AI can online learning can level up their skills in what have been unthinkable pace, and this generation of extremely talented but ever shrinking pool will make senior folks like me redundant over the years, entering a an era effeciency and prosperity (I hope) Ofc sounds too optimistic, but maybe LLM and future break throughs can be the disease and the cure

Like
Reply
Iulian Postelnicu

🔐 Detection Engineering & Threat Hunting(GIAC® GCFA | GNFA | GDAT | OSDA | OSWP | CRTP) @ Dynatrace

4mo

Is the same thing in other IT areas, with AI and automations we tend to forget about juniors and in the long run will be really hard to find people. If we don’t take care about our present juniors, we won‘t have future seniors. Plus you can’t become senior without any hands on experience, but this are the times, right?😳

Like
Reply
Alexandru Stan

Organisational Development | Coach

4mo

I am waiting for the moment where people will start asking about the ethics of the companies providing services. AI used this way will eventually harm society more than it will help. Relying on a piece of software to think for you is as good as its flaws. No AI is extempt of bugs.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics