🤯 🤯 🤯 This email gets a 96 in Lavender. So of course, I want to replicate it. This little AI workflow reverse engineers the email to create a framework. You can then use that framework to craft emails yourself, or to inform your AI prompts. Here's the workflow if you want to try it out for yourself: https://lnkd.in/eG3Xt2wQ #gtmai #sales #sdr
Have you ever hit 100 or 99 on Lavander Kyle Coleman
That's awesome. Love how relevant and specific that pain is. Can you share the workflow? Thanks!
Very interested to see the workflow please
This is gold! I’d love to see the workflow.
Thanks for Sharing, Kyle!
My favorite use case for this is quickly becoming drafting follow up emails… create a FU email prompt based on your top reps follow up notes, and then feed a call transcript as the input… now boom, you now have an ultra high quality automatically drafted post-call email. That’s an hour back every day easy.
Great idea! Automating email creation can boost productivity and consistency! 🚀
Wow, mind-blowing approach to email creation! Reverse engineering for the win. Thanks for sharing the workflow, can't wait to give it a try. Kyle Coleman
We’ve found that applying a similar strategy to web design, focusing on user flow really improves engagement and results.
Turn strangers into customers | Outbound & Sales Coach, Trainer, and SKO Speaker for B2B sales teams
2moI hate to be critical here…but this email reads like landing page copy. It doesn’t have the look or feel of a 1:1 email. If the idea was to land a meeting with a head or VP of Sales, this would likely miss the mark. It’s very feature focused va speaking to outcomes the leader would care about (improving conversions). That’s the problem with these prompts. Sure, they can format an email to get a great score. But the actual talking points aren’t graded because the prompt doesn’t know what these personas actually care about. I’m totally open to hearing that this email gets great reply rates 😂 As I missing something here?