Legal Northwest | NW Staffing Resources’ Post

🚨 A very informative article on how cybercriminals recruit insiders for malicious acts. Employees can pose a unique type of threat to an organisation. Most employees are not malicious, and they ought to be trusted with access to the data and systems needed for performing their tasks. However, those who are lured by a variety of methods to use their positions to assist in criminal enterprises can cause significant financial and reputational damage to their employers. #cyberthreat #insider

Locked Down: In-House Legal Chiefs Fight Privacy, Security Risks - Threats of data breaches and cyber-attacks keep chief legal officers and general counsels up at night—even if they don’t directly oversee security at their companies. - The evidence for such worries isn’t just anecdotal. Nearly 900 Chief Legal Officers surveyed in 2023 by the Association of Corporate Counsel and e-discovery firm Exterro cited data protection privacy rules among their top legal challenges. - Privacy and data security are multifaceted, complex issues for companies, their customers, and their employees. Large-scale hacks—often orchestrated through savvy social engineering or low-tech spam email—occur regularly, and data breaches carry the risk of material and reputational damage. It’s ... Read More? Subscribe to Bloomberg: https://lnkd.in/gbG9yumb

Cybersecurity Jobs Cybersecurity Jobs Corporate (Privacy and Data Security) Associate - All Offices - Fox Rothschild LLP - , All Offices APPLY NOW ! Apply Now! #cybersecurity #technology #informationsecurity #cybersecurityengineer #infosecjobs #cybersecurityconsultant #jobsearch #cyberdefenses

Prioritising the containment of information to protect an organisation's reputation at the expense of addressing the potential harm to customers' identities is a deeply problematic approach. This kind of decision-making can lead to significant consequences, not just for the individuals whose data may have been compromised but also for the organisation itself in the longer term. When companies choose to delay or hide the disclosure of a breach, they risk: The longer it takes for users to be aware of a breach, the more time malicious actors have to exploit the stolen data. Many jurisdictions have strict regulations requiring timely reporting of data breaches, and failing to comply can result in hefty fines and legal actions. When customers eventually find out that a company knew about a data breach and didn't inform them, the damage to trust can be severe and long-lasting. The ethical and practical path is indeed to be upfront about these issues, allowing individuals to protect themselves and demonstrating that the organisation values the security and privacy of its users. Over time, this approach can help build a reputation for integrity and responsibility, which is invaluable. This unethical practice must stop

Hidden pitfalls in data protection agreements - How to protect your organization... Data protection agreements are crucial for safeguarding sensitive information, but they often contain hidden traps that can leave organizations vulnerable. From ambiguous language to overly broad data usage rights, these pitfalls can have significant consequences. It's essential to carefully review these agreements, ensuring that all terms are clear, data usage is appropriately limited, and your organization’s rights are protected. Don’t let the fine print jeopardize your data security. Always consult with legal experts before signing! https://lnkd.in/dCv-tGB3

The misuse of business’ IT resources is well documented. A vast majority of employees use their work computers (or devices) for social media, online shooping,personal browsing, the list goes on. Employees using IT resources for non-work related purposes can be very detrimental to businesses as a whole. Disadvantages of misuse of IT resources include time wastage and decrease in productivity, overall reduction of network efficiency, peed and bandwidth, moreover, the misuse of IT-resources could lead to system exposure to various viruses and may increase the likelihood of being hacked. This begs the question: how do businesses prevent the misuse of their IT-resources? The answer is simple; by implementing IT-Use policies. By implementing acceptable use policies (AUP) business can track, monitor and prevent misuse of the IT assets. Guidelines for what AUP’s provisions should encompass: •The AUP should clearly define which assets are included in the policy •The AUP should state whether the employees assets are to be used for work purposes only •It should state that in the case that an IT-asset may be used for personal. use, the scope of personal use should be stated clearly. •the policy should clearly outline whether the work devices are to be kept at the place of business or whether they may be taken home •In the case of employees that bring their own device to the office (BOYD) the policy should clearly indicate how and when business IT systems may be used •The policy should clearly outline which content is prohibited •Should the business allow for social media, the policy should indicate at what times of the day social media is allowed and what type •The AUP should clearly indicate that copying or transferring data from a business asset to a personal asset is prohibited, should that be the case For more information on IT use policies, implementation and drafting, visit https://lnkd.in/dsnqk_84 or contact us for any of you AUP related queries today! Cell: +27 (76) 592-7164 Email: info@gpbouwerattorneys.co.za Web: https://lnkd.in/dsnqk_84 #ITUsePolicies #AcceptableUsePolicies #BusinessItAssets #CyberLaw #ICTLaw #InformationComunicationsandTechnologyLaw #Attorneys #ITLaw #AttorneysInLaw #CyberServices #LegalFrameworks

As demand for data security and privacy expertise continues to evolve, in-house legal teams face new challenges and opportunities. And despite organisations turning to external providers for guidance, legal recruiters emphasised the importance for in-house counsel to upskill. https://bit.ly/3X17nLY

As demand for data security and privacy expertise continues to evolve, in-house legal teams face new challenges and opportunities. And despite organisations turning to external providers for guidance, legal recruiters emphasised the importance for in-house counsel to upskill. https://bit.ly/3X17nLY

Welcome to ODIT, where we take compliance so seriously, we’ve been known to dream in legal jargon (don’t worry, we’re seeking professional help for that). But seriously, we’re the folks who’ve cracked the code on making the mind-numbing world of regulatory compliance feel like a walk in the park—if that park were filled with cybersecurity ninjas and data privacy wizards. Forget everything you’ve heard about compliance being boring. We’re here to prove that ensuring your business runs smoother than a jazz solo isn’t just a job—it’s our weirdly specific passion. We’re like the regulatory sherpas guiding you through the treacherous terrain of ever-evolving regulations, only with fewer avalanches and more paperwork (we promise it’s less scary than it sounds). Our team? Think of us as your personal compliance superheroes, minus the capes (they’re a tripping hazard). We bring a mix of charm, brains, and a disturbingly detailed knowledge of regulatory standards to the table. After all, you can’t really go wrong with a team made up of legal eagles and cyber nerds who live for this stuff. Our mission? To make sure your business is not only up to code but also laughing all the way to the bank—or at least smiling through the audits. So, whether you’re drowning in cyber dilemmas or simply want to avoid a regulatory oopsie, we’ve got your back. Governance isn’t just a necessity; it’s an adventure. And yes, we do make it look good. #GovernanceMadeEasy #ComplianceWithCharm #CyberNinjasAtWork #RegulatorySuperheroes #SmoothCompliance #AuditReady #DataPrivacyWizards #ComplianceAdventure #NoMoreOopsies #GovernanceGoals #BusinessWithoutHiccups #CyberEaglesInAction #CyberGovernanceDoneRight

Seems like companies need a scapegoat. What if the CISO has requested budget and been denied? Does the CFO end up on the hook or the CEO or everyone? Security should be everyone's responsibility, accountability is the CISOs role but if constrained by financial or other means to perform their duties then they it may be best to turn down the role and not take the risk.