LG India’s Post

What more a consumer can expect from a so-called mean global company that illegitimately forces a senior citizen elite LG consumer under a safe package of protection of the nexus of corruption and corruptible modus operandi behind the scenes to accept illegitimate non-mandatory documents of an illegal debit note dated 26.6.21, an invalid suspicious tax invoice dated 12.2.22 and a delivery challan dated 8.7.21 under irrelevant narratives of non-mandatory defective LG policies not reoriented to meet the legitimate compliance with legitimate compulsory mandatory provisions about invoice and e-receipt as a substitute for legitimate mandatory documents as prescribed in para 5 of the new Consumer Protection (General) Rules,2020 read with Section 2 (47)(vii) of the new CP Act,2019 and Section 31 Rule 46 of GST Rules,2017. My son is a doctor and his wife too. They purchased a new 3BHK flat in a new scheme and possession is expected shortly and requires the purchase of all new household equipment and appliances and asked for my advice when I had to express my bitter experience with LG company and advised him and other neighbours and his friends circle to purchase any product except LG, a shameless so-called global company that does not afford to give legitimate legal valid invoice and e-receipt containing mandatory contents of name and address of recipient and consignee even after collecting NEFT Rs.9632 on 25.6.21 to date. How to trust such a mean so-called insensitive, arrogant, and adamant global company with a sense of entitlement and NPD, and why choose LG products that offer the worst services after sales and evade/refuse to give a legitimate legally valid invoice and e-receipt and exploit the consumer rights victimizing a senior citizen elite LG consumer for the last more than 3 years in a silly issue damaging its own credibility for silly narratives? Reference No: GCP241112022678 Date: 12/11/2024 20:04 57    Type of Inquiry: E-mail to CEO

Think a hundred times before choosing LG considering the bad experience of several consumers about poor after sales-services and refusal to give valid legal invoices and e-receipts containing names and addresses of consumers as recipients and consignees of goods supplied by LG in a B2C transaction of supply of goods for purchase of a new model with market price Rs.44192 in part consideration of NEFT Rs.9632 instead of Rs.992 and rest considerations in return for a defective model (Rs.43200) failed 3 times remaining out of service for 127 (53+5+69) days from 9.4.20 to 30.4.21 with repair charges Rs.1954 with invoice, Rs.4431.10 with e-receipt and Rs.9632 for no invoice and no e-receipt and LG failed to comply with mandatory provisions contained in Section 31 Rule 46 of GST Rules, 2017 deriving provisions of para 5 of Consumer Protection (General) Rules, 2020 read with section 2 (47)(vii) of new CP Act, 2019. Had LG complied with these mandatory provisions, mandatory documents, and mandatory contents LG could have avoided harassment and victimisation of a senior citizen elite LG consumer for the last more than 3 years from 26.6.21. This is the reality of arrogance and adamance of the LG service team supported by LG management. So, again think a hundred times about choosing LG in good faith and consider the reality of LG's poor services and arrogance and adamance in non-compliance with mandatory provisions that cost ZERO but no sensitivity for compliance with laws or senior citizens elite LG consumers. Had LG focused diligently and considered the compulsory legal compliance with the mandatory provisions in question on 26.6.21, LG could have gladly issued a valid legal tax invoice on 26.6.21 and an e-receipt on 26.6.21 at no cost or no time and LG could have avoided (i) the issuing of an illegal disputed Debit note on 26.6.21 and (ii) avoided invalid disputed suspicious tax invoice on 12.2.22 after seven months of delivery challan dated.8.7.21, (iii) avoided 163 complaints on INGRAM, 32 complaints, and 5 appeals on CPGRAMS, CMO complaint, Minister complaint, PMO complaint, etc, (iv) more importantly avoided victimization of senior citizen consumer for more than 3 years by simple compliance with mandatory provisions in question (v) avoided wastage of precious resources of manpower, money, time, and energy for the last 3 years for possible gainful productive use. Still, it is shocking to highlight that even after 3 years, LG and NCH do not want to learn any lesson and are noticed as arrogant and adamant about not focusing on compliance with mandatory provisions and not issuing valid legal invoices and e-receipt containing my name and address as “Dhirubhai Vaghela, Plot No: 29/2, Sector 4 A, Gandhinagar-382006” as recipient and consignee of the goods supplied by LG in addition to "One Time Customer For Defective Return" to keep balancing between mandatory provisions and policy to serve the purpose of resolution

Greetings from a senior citizen elite LG consumer! People should not get misguided by such promotional advertisements and marketing strategies on Independence Day and think about past performance and present performance of the products and services before taking a decision. The Indian consumers are very much dissatisfied and aggrieved with LG products and poor after-sales services and want freedom from LG as can be confirmed by visiting the websites https://lnkd.in/d2nAk3nT ; https://lnkd.in/dt6_Nd7w and https://lnkd.in/d7NUhZX6 ; This is just a show, LG never reverts to consumer needs. LG has been refusing mandatory documents of an invoice and e-receipt containing mandatory contents of my name and address as recipient and consignee of goods supplied by LG irrespective of purchase or replacement after collecting Rs.9632 for the last 3 years. LG says it is a free-of-cost replacement and not a purchase of a new model in part considerations of Rs.9632 and rest considerations for return of defective model. Thus, LG follows double jeopardy - by giving faulty products and in return victimisation for 3 years and more by refusing mandatory documents. What is the credibility of a global company in victimizing senior citizens? vaghela_db@yahoo.com When LG considers it free of cost, what for LG collected Rs.9632 from me? What stops LG from considering a refund of Rs.9632 + interest at the market rate from the date of receipt i.e., 25.6.21, an apology letter from the CEO/MD and compensation for earlier 127 (53+5+69) days of the defective model remained out of service and for 3 years of victimization for non-compliance of mandatory provisions for documents and their mandatory contents? Sir, it is more disheartening to know the negative and dirty role of the National Consumer Helpline (NCH), its Director (then and now) CA PG NCH, and the Grievance Redressal Officer and NPGO in the Department of Consumer Affairs in misusing the status and supporting the LG company being convergence partner of NCH with corruptible methods and modus operandi in managing my 197 complaints upto PMO giving me wrong advice for 3 years without focusing on implementation of mandatory provisions of documents and their mandatory contents of my name and address in the illegal Debit note and the invalid suspicious tax invoice issued in dark clouds after seven months of delivery challan. NCH and DoCA have been noticed as encouraging non-compliance with mandatory provisions prescribed in Section 31 Rule 46 of GST Rules, 2017 deriving provisions of para 5 of Consumer Protection (General) Rules, 2020 read with section 2 (47)(vii) of new CP Act,2019. As I observed, they have been busy with all possibilities of corruption to the tune , needs, and interests of LG company for the past 3 years. Is this not shocking?

Every word you write, every note you hum carries the power to inspire. 🌟 Let your creativity flow and your dreams take flight, because brighter tomorrows are built on the optimism we share today. 🎶✨ #LG #LGIndia #LifesGood #LifesGoodWithKpop #OptimismYourFeed #OptimisticWords #Optimism #Kpop #InspiringWords #PostitiveWords #BeingOptimistic

What more a consumer can expect from a so-called mean global company that illegitimately forces a senior citizen elite LG consumer under a safe package of protection of the nexus of corruption and corruptible modus operandi behind the scenes to accept illegitimate non-mandatory documents of an illegal debit note dated 26.6.21, an invalid suspicious tax invoice dated 12.2.22 and a delivery challan dated 8.7.21 under irrelevant narratives of non-mandatory defective LG policies not reoriented to meet the legitimate compliance with legitimate compulsory mandatory provisions about invoice and e-receipt as a substitute for legitimate mandatory documents as prescribed in para 5 of the new Consumer Protection (General) Rules,2020 read with Section 2 (47)(vii) of the new CP Act,2019 and Section 31 Rule 46 of GST Rules,2017. My son is a doctor and his wife too. They purchased a new 3BHK flat in a new scheme and possession is expected shortly and requires the purchase of all new household equipment and appliances and asked for my advice when I had to express my bitter experience with LG company and advised him and other neighbours and his friends circle to purchase any product except LG, a shameless so-called global company that does not afford to give legitimate legal valid invoice and e-receipt containing mandatory contents of name and address of recipient and consignee even after collecting NEFT Rs.9632 on 25.6.21 to date. How to trust such a mean so-called insensitive, arrogant, and adamant global company with a sense of entitlement and NPD, and why choose LG products that offer the worst services after sales and evade/refuse to give a legitimate legally valid invoice and e-receipt and exploit the consumer rights victimizing a senior citizen elite LG consumer for the last more than 3 years in a silly issue damaging its own credibility for silly narratives? Reference No: GCP241112022678 Date: 12/11/2024 20:04 57    Type of Inquiry: E-mail to CEO

ICYMI: The video game industry needs a Bud Light moment: What this industry truly needs now more than ever is a Bud Light moment to correct course. #BugLight #PrideMonth #LGBTQ #Xbox #Nintendo #boycott #DylanMulvaney #Target #genderideology

Since the release of season 2 of #SquidGame, there have been a lot of discussions around Park Sung-hoon, a cisgender male actor, playing Hyun-ju, a trans woman. As a staunch supporter of representation all things media, this was an especially interesting story for us. Internally and externally at our agency, we've always emphasized #ProgressOverPerfection with all the brands we work with, and we feel this story with Squid Game is a perfect example of it. Would we have liked a trans woman to play the character? Yes. Do we also understand director Hwang Dong-hyuk's explanation that "there are close to no actors that are openly trans" in Korean society where the #2SLGBTQIA+ community is extremely marginalized? Also yes. The most important thing through all of this is that they included a transgender character who: a) brought a complete and complex backstory with realistic motivations c) wasn't solely defined by the fact that they were trans That is exactly was #ProgressOverPerfection is all about. Too often, we encounter brands who won't take that first step towards inclusion in fear it isn't perfect, without realizing that taking no steps at all is even worse. ⏩ Sign up for our newsletter here for more insights on marketing, advertising, communications, and how the industry intersects with inclusion: https://lnkd.in/gnddWeBT [ID: A split-image graphic features two portraits of the actor, Park Sung-Hoon as a man (left) and him playing a trans women in the Squid Games Netflix series (right). The bold headline reads: "How Brands Can Learn from Squid Game's Second Season." Background elements form a collage of staged scenes, evoking the show's environment. The hashtag "#ProgressOverPerfection" stands out prominently, emphasizing the message. Additional design elements, such as small blurred numbers and labels, add texture to the composition. ]

🌈 As we dive into mid-July, let's keep the spirit of Pride alive beyond June! Last month, we explored the vibrant world of geek culture and gaming in our blog post "Queer Characters and Narratives in Role-Playing Style Games." 🎮 In this post, we celebrated the evolving landscape of queer representation in role-playing games (RPGs), highlighting how these games provide crucial spaces for identity exploration and inclusivity. Whether you're into Dungeons & Dragons or exploring digital realms like Baldur’s Gate III, these games offer avenues for LGBTQIA+ gamers to feel seen and represented. 🌟 From iconic queer protagonists to games that empower players to create inclusive characters, our blog delved into the diverse narratives and customizable experiences that shape the gaming community today. Celebrate gaming, celebrate diversity, and celebrate PRIDE! 🏳️🌈 Comment "Pride" for a link to the blog post, or visit our website to read more. #Pride #LGBTQIA #GamingCommunity #RolePlayingGames #GeekCulture #RepresentationMatters #NewHopeCounseling

🤔Interesting & compelling #advertisement imo advocating for #fairness & #safety in #girls & #womens #sports . #xx #xy It will be interesting to see the #nike response, if any. And also how long this post will last before being #censored 🤐 by the #lgbt & #dei powers that are against such fairness & safety for girls & women. 🏃♀️⛹️♀️⚽️🏐🥊