Weekly sustainability round up for Design, Development & Supply Chain ⬇ 🔎 Traceability Tesco have introduced digital product passports for clothing, ahead of the upcoming EU legislation (ESPR) on product traceability. These passports offer customers detailed information on the materials and environmental impact of their products. Also huge kudos to maje for their user-friendly and informative DPPs I recently saw – a great example of customer-focused traceability! ♻ Recycling! Zara 's latest women’s collection features Circ Lyocell, a fabric that resembles silk but is made from 50% recycled textile waste. Four pieces in this collection are crafted from 100% Circ Lyocell, showing a commitment to circular design through the use of recycled materials and timeless, seasonal silhouettes. CARBIOS (I know I always mention them!) is now eyeing the UK for its next PET polyester recycling plant! FCC has signed a letter of intent with Carbios to explore the establishment of a UK-based plant using their bio recycling technology. This could be a significant step forward for UK PET waste and blended textile recycling. ⚪ Circular Business Its great to see Vestiaire Collective featured in Netflix's hit series Emily in Paris, which helps to boost the resale platform’s profile and engage new audiences on next-life options for their clothes! Additionally, Vestiaire has partnered with e-tailers Mytheresa and LUISAVIAROMA to expand its presence in the US, along with major resale players like eBay, Poshmark and Whatnot. ⛰ Performance! Performance brands often face the challenge of achieving high performance products without relying on hazardous chemicals like PFOA (used for water resistance and durability). British brand Montane Ltd has addressed this with Petrichor, a 100% waterproof three-layer fabric that sets a new standard for PFAS-free protection for performance products. The fabric features a windproof, hydrophilic membrane (helps with moisture management), a 100% recycled nylon 21D ripstop outer (lightweight and durable fabric), and a tricot lining (strong yet flexible fabric) helping to manage the wearer’s microclimate without prohibiting movement. I’m excited to see these products introduced as part of their AW24 collection. #sustainabledesign #circulardesign #traceability #sustainablefashion #circularbusinessmodels
Lizzie Perry’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
As Robert Little points out, the facts about fashion waste and consumer demand are illuminating—and highlight the need for change. We’re happy to be rethinking the matter, to create solutions that empower consumers and businesses of all sizes. What changes are you hoping to see in the fashion industry? 📝⬇️
The average EU citizen buys 14.8 kg of new clothing and footwear each year, yet less than half of used clothes in the EU are collected for reuse or recycling, and a mere 1% are recycled into new clothes. Are we consuming fashion faster than our planet can keep up? ♻️ Recent studies ("Consumers’ awareness and attitudes in circular fashion" - https://lnkd.in/gGvAC5bF ; "Localised waste reduction networks, global destruction networks and the circular economy" - https://lnkd.in/gF39aWXp) shed light on the challenges and opportunities in making circular fashion a reality. While consumer interest in sustainable practices is on the rise, brands need to step up their efforts to make circular initiatives more accessible and effective. Researchers examined 17 "eco-conscious" apparel companies in Europe and the US, focusing on their post-consumer policies like repair services, take-back programs, and resale platforms. The findings highlight a concerning gap between consumer intentions and the practical limitations of current circular initiatives. A few stats that stood out: 🟢 Less than 50% of used clothes are collected for reuse or recycling in the EU. 🟢 66.7% of consumers surveyed were aware of the concept of a circular economy. 🟢 81% of Spanish consumers expressed concerns about textile waste. 🟢 Only 1% of used clothes are recycled into new clothes. 🟢 The global fashion industry is valued at $3 trillion. 🟢 Resale will more than double by 2028, growing 6.4X faster than the broader retail clothing sector and representing a CAGR of 17% (Threadup resale report) 🟢 It is estimated that the fashion industry is responsible for 2-8% of global carbon emissions. 🟢 85% of textiles end up in landfills each year. The research reveals that while many brands are taking steps towards circularity, there's a disconnect between their ambitions and the accessibility of their initiatives. Consumers are increasingly eco-conscious, but the limitations of current circular schemes, particularly in terms of geographical reach, hinder their ability to participate fully. It's clear that a more comprehensive and inclusive approach is needed to bridge this gap. Brands must invest in expanding the availability of circular services, ensuring that all consumers, regardless of location, can actively contribute to a more sustainable fashion future. #CircularFashion #Sustainability #FashionIndustry
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
#wednesdayWonderings Australia, we have a clothing consumption crisis. Australians are the biggest purchasers of new clothing in the world per capita, with 56 pieces a year, ahead of the United States on 53 pieces. The UK is in third place with 33 pieces, ahead of China on 30. For years we’ve thought ourselves the second biggest purchaser behind the US (still nothing to celebrate) but new data reveals we are truly the worst. We discard more than 300,000 tonnes of clothing every year to landfill or textile recycling (but mostly landfill). Whilst awareness of the negative impact of fashion is at its highest ever, the volume of textiles sent to landfill is gradually increasing, while the proportion being recycled largely remains stagnant, at around five per cent. I am 100% guilty of contributing to this problem - I love fashion and crafting new outfits and looks. Heck just this weekend I bought a new skirt and two winter tops. We need government, business and consumers to come together to try and address this problem. For me, I’ve unsubscribed to all the clothing brands that I’ve bought from and unfollowed brands on Instagram - seeing cool things share online was leading to me wanting to buy more. It’s not perfect, I’m not perfect, but small steps go a long way. Read more in this wonderful article by Melissa Singer - https://lnkd.in/ghjKNufX #fastfashion #australia #clothingwaste
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Do you follow the latest fashion trends, and end up have piles of old clothes that you no longer wear or know what to do with? I know that I do, which is is why I was exited to read that low-price retailers Kmart and Target have teamed up with Australian university RMIT to launch a landmark study to better understand the causes of fashion waste. With sustainable shopping emerging as a pivotal trend and many reports revealing that consumers - especially millennials and Gen Z - are now opting to reduce their fast fashion intake, it is another example of consumers reflecting this deeper commitment sustainability. It will be great to see what insights this study bring for the Australian industry! #retail #fashion #sustainability #kmart #target #Australia #grantthornton
Kmart, Target tackle fashion waste in landmark study - Ragtrader
ragtrader.com.au
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I've been actively trying to shift my shopping habits to embrace circular fashion. And I’ve been going two years strong 💪 Instead of shopping at fast fashion retailers, I've delved into: 🤳 online resale platforms like Vinted 👜 vintage boutiques 🛍️ charity shops & my sisters wardrobe too ha ha 👯♀️ And I'm eager to explore fashion rental too! So, why the change? Beyond the fact I like discovering unique pieces this way, it's about making a real impact in reducing fashion's environmental footprint. Now, lets consider these eye-opening statistics: 🌊 Nearly 10% of microplastics in the ocean annually come from textiles. 🗑️ The fashion industry churns out a staggering 92 million tons of textile waste each year. 📈 Textile waste is projected to surge by approximately 60% between 2015 and 2030. 💸 Approximately 30% of produced clothes remain unsold annually! And where do most of these go? You guessed it! Mostly exported to more landfills 😭 But here's a silver lining... By 2029, the second-hand market is expected to skyrocket by a whopping 185% worldwide! Reflecting a growing collective consciousness towards sustainability. 🥳 However, let's not forget that despite this positive trend, the fast fashion industry still anticipates a 20% growth. 🥲 There's clearly an ongoing need for education and support surrounding sustainable fashion practices. But, With the rise of resale apps, expectations have shifted from encouraging consumers to invest in expensive sustainable brands. This widening market helps remove the unfair blame often placed on those with lower incomes.🙌 In fact, I've found that by shopping through these platforms, I can now access brands and designers that would have otherwise been beyond my budget! 🧥 Remember, our consumption choices matter. We shouldn’t be consuming clothes like disposable goods. 🤦🏻♀️ Opting for pre-loved treasures instead of mass-produced items contributes to a more circular economy, where garments are valued, reused, and repurposed ♻️, ultimately reducing the chance of them ending up in landfills. And often, we export our textile waste to the four largest clothing landfills situated in Ghana, India, Chile, and Kenya, highlighting our global responsibility to manage our textile waste. We are sharing this planet! 🌍 Just because we send the problem away doesn’t make it solved. Let's actively support the growth of the second-hand market, not merely as a trend, but as a conscious decision towards a more sustainable future. Together, we can reshape the fashion industry's narrative and cultivate wardrobes that reflect our values. 🫶 Ps. Some of the coolest outfits I’ve seen as styled from pre-loved items and amazing vintage finds 😉 #CircularFashion #SustainableStyle #SecondHandRevolution
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Frankly, focusing solely on reducing production strikes me as a misguided approach. After all, we're in the business of creating and selling desirable products. Now, I understand some might find this controversial coming from someone dedicated to the industry's environmental and social impact. However, I believe true transformation requires more. Instead of simply producing less, shouldn't we be striving for a fundamental shift in material composition? We, as creators, should be held accountable – starting with a minimum of 50% natural fibers obbligation and 30% recycled or upcycled materials. The remaining 20% if synthetic, it should have higher taxes. Moreover, couldn't we leverage trade policies to incentivize sustainable practices? Imagine lower HS Codes for natural fibers and higher ones for synthetic alternatives. Let's be honest. If we, as industry leaders, are truly serious about change, clinging to the status quo and expecting different results is simply disingenuous. It borders on disrespect for the very consumers we urge to change their habits. We can't keep offering them subpar, unsustainable products while simultaneously preaching responsible consumption. Isn't this worse than the fast-food industry? Consumers lack the transparency we, as creators, should be providing. It's time to stop the charade and enact meaningful change that demonstrates true accountability.
Sustainable fashion has a problem. To cite ELLE Canada magazine: "SHEIN is a member of Textile Exchange, features a collection made from materials with low environmental impact, has a [deadstock program] uses a virtually-on-demand manufacturing model, and so on, checking all the expert-approved environmentally responsible boxes." This from Atelier Jolie: "We will use only leftover, quality vintage material and deadstock." https://lnkd.in/eQce7Y7a See what I mean? Agricultural fibers are the vehicle for a just transition. Some 3% of the world’s population earns at least part of their annual income from natural fiber production. It's disappointing that Angelina Jolie has no more interest in contributing to SDGs 1 & 2 than SHEIN. Even for the environment, the impact at the factory gate is not what matters. Simple arithmetic tells us impact per wear is the vital variable. For a brand, the most important consideration is not how you produce. It's how you sell. As the Elle article points out even "companies that claim eco-friendliness is part of their ethos, like Reformation and Everlane", source their manufacturing in China - just like SHEIN. Over lunch, last Friday, Hakan Karaosman told me that Turkish suppliers he had interviewed claimed that more than higher prices, they needed reliability - long-term contracts, promptly paid in full. As we both agreed and this second article notes: https://lnkd.in/dBtit975 Shein "puts an unusual amount of money and trust into its suppliers, providing them access to the brand’s data and IT systems and requiring very little to start doing business: just an agreement that the factory will provide stable and reliable delivery." The primary problem with SHEIN is not the way it produces. It's the way it sells. More on that from the n+1 article linked above: There are flash sales - 90% off for 24 hours only. "The more you buy, the more SHEIN points you receive, and the more you save on future purchases. It’s purposefully addictive. You can get points by just opening the app, watching live streams, or playing mini-games on the SHEIN website. Likes are a currency, convertible into SHEIN points. Posting a review earns five points, a review with pictures earns ten, and a review with size information earns an additional two. Every dollar spent on SHEIN earns a point, and every one hundred points turns back into a dollar." Your Shein package arrives with a flyer advertising SHEIN Exchange “Give your pre-loved clothing a new life while making others’ pre-loved pieces your own.” The green reverse promotes “evoluSHEIN's collection made from recycled polyester . . . and other responsibly sourced materials that reduce the impact on the planet.” If we want to fix it, let's measure brands by how they sell, not how they produce. And let's tax polyester! https://lnkd.in/eQrpucWr
Are Fashion Brands Getting Greener? | Elle Canada
ellecanada.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Who would’ve thought I’d find myself making a last-minute purchase at H&M for a pair of jeans? 😅 As someone who is invested both personally and professionally in understanding fashion’s environmental impact through my work on textile R&D projects focused on circularity and recycling e.g SCIRT Project and other #EU HORIZON 2020 projects, I’ve been consciously avoiding fast fashion for a few years. Which is easier than one thinks when there are so many great #vintage & #2nd hand & #upcycling options. But this time, with a bit of reluctance, and a dire need for a pair of jeans I decided to do a quick Saturday morning dash to #H&M to explore their sustainable section. 🛍️ To my surprise, I found some jeans made with 20% recycled material. While I could verify this up to a point, (an issue for us consumers which hopefully will be addressed in the upcoming #DPP, #EPR and other EU regulations to underpin a more sustainable textile and fashion industry!) But what truly impressed me was what I found at the checkout—a textile return bin! ♻️✨ #H&M is offering customers the opportunity to return reusable garments (also extra kudos because it is not limited to only their brand) and earn points in return. This is a promising 1st step from a fast fashion brand often critiqued for its practices, also they seem to be preparing ahead of upcoming EPR regulations. It’s encouraging to see initiatives like this making their way into mainstream fashion brands. We still have a long way to go, but every step counts. 👏 Are there other sustainable initiatives or practices that you’d recommend for consumers beyond the usual repair, resale, or gifting? I’d love to hear your thoughts! 💡 #SustainableFashion #CircularEconomy #ResponsibleConsumerism #TextileRecycling #ImpactfulChange
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
'👗🌍 Guess launches online clothing recycling programme ♻️👕 Your fashion, our future! #SustainableFashion #RecycleYourStyle 💚 Get deeper insights at Databoutique.com, your largest source for public data in retail. 📊✨ #RetailInsights #DataDriven' by FashionUnited about Guess Europe Sagl
Guess launches online clothing recycling programme
fashionunited.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It's worth highlighting: “Agricultural fibers are the vehicle for a just transition. Some 3% of the world’s population earns at least part of their annual income from natural fiber production.” Consuming natural fibers and giving them a long life is a way of promoting the sustainability of fashion and increasing equity in global society. Additionally, repairing a natural fiber garment can support a job near you. A luxury item is an item that deserves to be repaired.
Sustainable fashion has a problem. To cite ELLE Canada magazine: "SHEIN is a member of Textile Exchange, features a collection made from materials with low environmental impact, has a [deadstock program] uses a virtually-on-demand manufacturing model, and so on, checking all the expert-approved environmentally responsible boxes." This from Atelier Jolie: "We will use only leftover, quality vintage material and deadstock." https://lnkd.in/eQce7Y7a See what I mean? Agricultural fibers are the vehicle for a just transition. Some 3% of the world’s population earns at least part of their annual income from natural fiber production. It's disappointing that Angelina Jolie has no more interest in contributing to SDGs 1 & 2 than SHEIN. Even for the environment, the impact at the factory gate is not what matters. Simple arithmetic tells us impact per wear is the vital variable. For a brand, the most important consideration is not how you produce. It's how you sell. As the Elle article points out even "companies that claim eco-friendliness is part of their ethos, like Reformation and Everlane", source their manufacturing in China - just like SHEIN. Over lunch, last Friday, Hakan Karaosman told me that Turkish suppliers he had interviewed claimed that more than higher prices, they needed reliability - long-term contracts, promptly paid in full. As we both agreed and this second article notes: https://lnkd.in/dBtit975 Shein "puts an unusual amount of money and trust into its suppliers, providing them access to the brand’s data and IT systems and requiring very little to start doing business: just an agreement that the factory will provide stable and reliable delivery." The primary problem with SHEIN is not the way it produces. It's the way it sells. More on that from the n+1 article linked above: There are flash sales - 90% off for 24 hours only. "The more you buy, the more SHEIN points you receive, and the more you save on future purchases. It’s purposefully addictive. You can get points by just opening the app, watching live streams, or playing mini-games on the SHEIN website. Likes are a currency, convertible into SHEIN points. Posting a review earns five points, a review with pictures earns ten, and a review with size information earns an additional two. Every dollar spent on SHEIN earns a point, and every one hundred points turns back into a dollar." Your Shein package arrives with a flyer advertising SHEIN Exchange “Give your pre-loved clothing a new life while making others’ pre-loved pieces your own.” The green reverse promotes “evoluSHEIN's collection made from recycled polyester . . . and other responsibly sourced materials that reduce the impact on the planet.” If we want to fix it, let's measure brands by how they sell, not how they produce. And let's tax polyester! https://lnkd.in/eQrpucWr
Are Fashion Brands Getting Greener? | Elle Canada
ellecanada.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Sustainable fashion has a problem. To cite ELLE Canada magazine: "SHEIN is a member of Textile Exchange, features a collection made from materials with low environmental impact, has a [deadstock program] uses a virtually-on-demand manufacturing model, and so on, checking all the expert-approved environmentally responsible boxes." This from Atelier Jolie: "We will use only leftover, quality vintage material and deadstock." https://lnkd.in/eQce7Y7a See what I mean? Agricultural fibers are the vehicle for a just transition. Some 3% of the world’s population earns at least part of their annual income from natural fiber production. It's disappointing that Angelina Jolie has no more interest in contributing to SDGs 1 & 2 than SHEIN. Even for the environment, the impact at the factory gate is not what matters. Simple arithmetic tells us impact per wear is the vital variable. For a brand, the most important consideration is not how you produce. It's how you sell. As the Elle article points out even "companies that claim eco-friendliness is part of their ethos, like Reformation and Everlane", source their manufacturing in China - just like SHEIN. Over lunch, last Friday, Hakan Karaosman told me that Turkish suppliers he had interviewed claimed that more than higher prices, they needed reliability - long-term contracts, promptly paid in full. As we both agreed and this second article notes: https://lnkd.in/dBtit975 Shein "puts an unusual amount of money and trust into its suppliers, providing them access to the brand’s data and IT systems and requiring very little to start doing business: just an agreement that the factory will provide stable and reliable delivery." The primary problem with SHEIN is not the way it produces. It's the way it sells. More on that from the n+1 article linked above: There are flash sales - 90% off for 24 hours only. "The more you buy, the more SHEIN points you receive, and the more you save on future purchases. It’s purposefully addictive. You can get points by just opening the app, watching live streams, or playing mini-games on the SHEIN website. Likes are a currency, convertible into SHEIN points. Posting a review earns five points, a review with pictures earns ten, and a review with size information earns an additional two. Every dollar spent on SHEIN earns a point, and every one hundred points turns back into a dollar." Your Shein package arrives with a flyer advertising SHEIN Exchange “Give your pre-loved clothing a new life while making others’ pre-loved pieces your own.” The green reverse promotes “evoluSHEIN's collection made from recycled polyester . . . and other responsibly sourced materials that reduce the impact on the planet.” If we want to fix it, let's measure brands by how they sell, not how they produce. And let's tax polyester! https://lnkd.in/eQrpucWr
Are Fashion Brands Getting Greener? | Elle Canada
ellecanada.com
To view or add a comment, sign in