Matthew Williams’ Post

View profile for Matthew Williams, graphic

Videographer and Photographer

I am not from the South and as far as I know, all my ancestors fought for the Union, these monuments do not reflect my history in any way. Sure, Washington and other founders had slaves, but they at least built a legacy beyond slavery and conquest, one that would, eventually, see the end of slavery. These monuments don't represent the U.S., they represent the Confederacy, a non-existent nation meant to preserve white supremacy, a policy that all the whites of the South, poor or rich, benefited from and fought for. It's only "your" land so long as it can't be the Black's or the Native's. Poor whites were just as guilty of preserving slavery as the plantation owners they admired, especially after spending decades after the war attacking freed Blacks and Republicans as part of armed terrorist groups like the KKK and Red Shirts and introducing racial segregation. The interests of the poor whites were still intrinsically racist. These Confederates were never honored for their bravery or any other sense of American value, they're honored for trying to maintain the superior status of the white Christian race, that's why these statues exist. Germany itself once held monuments dedicated to their civilian victims of the Allied bombing campaigns, but once it was realized these shrines were a flagrant attempt at vilifying the U.S. and making the Germans appear innocent (a revisionist narrative by Neo-Nazi's and ex-Soviets) most these monuments were removed.   There's a difference between history and worship, that is why we teach people American racism, not idolatrize it. THE STATUES MUST GO

Opinion: RFK Jr. is right about Confederate statues, protecting our shared American history

Opinion: RFK Jr. is right about Confederate statues, protecting our shared American history

msn.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics