I always think species IUCN listed as "Extinct in the Wild" have some of the most inspiring stories - their existence almost totally wiped out, save for people seeing the storm clouds on the horizon and taking emergency action to prevent their total loss from the planet.
It can be a difficult knowing how much effort/resource to put into ex-situ (captive breeding etc) vs. in-situ (habitat creation etc) measures for species, and it's a debate that also happens at the UK scale when trying to recover some of our most threatened wildlife.
If possible, I always advocate for a dual "plan for the best but prepare for the worst" approach. For extinction critical species focus on addressing the issues acting on the species in-situ as much as possible, but have the "safety net" of captive breeding programmes or ark sites, just in case in-situ measures fail and the worst happens.
Who knows, 40 years down the line they may be our only way of bringing a species back to the wild...
Awarded Social Entrepreneur. Hospitality & Tourism Enterprise Expert. Education & Boards. Concepts, Start-ups, Sustainable Revenue. Board Chair. CNN Hero.
5moImportant issues and well reported.