Remember the Good Ol’ Days When Wood Was Wood? by Matthew Little Epoch Health Senior Editor I am fond of wood, glass, wool, brass, and other natural materials. There is something so luxurious and honest about them in a world drowning in plastic. Not that plastic doesn’t serve its uses. It’s cheap, easy to work with, and plentiful. We can use plastic to make everything from blankets to baking sheets. Its versatility has been enhanced with thousands of chemicals to give it attributes like flexibility, heat resistance, and structural integrity. Unfortunately, plastic has become a plague of sorts. Among other things, it exposes us to chemicals that interfere with our hormones. Image A study published in Environmental Science & Technology earlier this year found even our plastic food packaging has hormone-disrupting chemicals and puts us at risk of developmental and reproductive issues, not to mention hormone-related cancers. Coincidentally, two hormone-related cancers, breast cancer and prostate cancer, are the most prevalent cancers for women and men respectively. Another issue is that plastic breaks down into particles small enough to be inhaled and ingested without our awareness. That means even plastic that has never touched our food or water can end up in our bodies. According to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, microplastics were found in the blocked arteries of over half the people in a study published in March (150 out of 304 people). These people were 4.5 times more likely to have a heart attack, stroke, or die in the following three years that researchers monitored them. And the above problems are becoming more severe due to the rapidly rising volume of plastic in the world today. Australian researchers estimate that many people could be eating the equivalent of a credit card in plastic each week. We often buy things second-hand to get higher-quality items at a cheaper price, whether that be winter clothing or real-wood flooring. If we need something, I set a reminder on our local buy and sell website to alert me if something comes up. I can include the materials I prefer: brass lamp, teak table, leather chair. There is something of the time held in these better-made goods. Something authentic. They do more than hold their value, they hold something of the people of their era. People had fewer things back then, but better things. I cringe at the thought that people will buy particle board furniture with a plastic coating to make it look like wood while solid oak bedroom sets go to the dump because they are “dated.” The benefits of our plastic floors (vinyl), blankets (microfiber), and cookware coatings (Teflon) are that they are convenient and cheap to buy, but they cost us as well. As the things we cook with, sit on, wear, and fill our homes with become cheaper, and more disposable and unnatural, I worry we lose touch with the very idea of enduring quality and authenticity.
michael tucevich’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
We need much more research to understand the full implication of recycling. Recycling is not, and will never be the solution to our plastic pollution crisis but we need a comprehensive approach that focuses on plastic reduction as the main feature. As COPCO we promote plastic substitution for certain applications, especially those that can not be reduced, reused or recycled. We also promote compostable plastics for plastics with food contact, agricultural plastics and plastics in the marine environment.
Focus is marine conservation but everything is connected. We cannot apply tunnel vision. Ask if externalities for solving Y create problems for X. Tries to apply humility and curiosity to solve 6th mass extinction
𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗬𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗗 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗦: 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗚𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗘 𝗜𝗡 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗞𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗡? (Most of us tend to have at least one) 𝙏𝙃𝙍𝙊𝙒 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙈 𝙊𝙐𝙏!!! The inimitable Judith Enck from Beyond Plastics gives an articulate and sobering argument why these articles should NEVER feature in your kitchen (I use wood or metal). Although black plastic makes up 15% of all plastic recyclables (largely single-use food containers), the vast majority is not recycled because the infrared technology used by recycling facilities to sort plastics cannot “see” the color black. As a result of this failure, most black plastic items end up in our landfills, incinerators, oceans and rivers after just a single use. Due to the lack of recycled black plastic, the demand is often met using e-waste (discarded electronics like old computers, phones, TVs, monitors, speakers, and appliances) that contain toxic chemicals such as phthalates, flame retardants, and heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, and mercury. These chemical-laced plastics are melted down, mixed with food grade plastics and turned into children’s toys, single-use utensils and coffee stirrers, hot cup lids, cooking implements, insulated mugs, jewelry, garden hoses, and holiday decorations, among other items. Although existing safety regulations limit the amounts of these chemicals and metals present in electronics, there are currently NO government regulations covering the safety of recycled black plastic items. Therefore, high levels of toxic chemicals that are prohibited in your laptop or phone are perfectly legal in your black plastic fork, spatula, slotted spoon, or hot cup lid. A 2018 University of Plymouth study found toxic chemicals present at up to 30 times the levels considered safe in a full 40 percent of the black plastic toys, thermoses, cocktail stirrers, and utensils tested. Please pass on and share... A simple move for your health and that of your loved ones https://lnkd.in/eTBnQw5Q Amanda Ellis Katarina Kohen Vermilye Marie-Laure Schaufelberger, CFA Rajesh Chandy Christopher Large Alexis Eyre Georgia Elliott-Smith Dr Fiona Pathiraja-Møller Sarah Jeffs Katell. Le Goulven, PhD Bianca Pitt Cindy Forde Esmeralda de Belgique Mamta Borgoyary Natalie Sifuma Florence Miller
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗬𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗗 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗦: 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗚𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗘 𝗜𝗡 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗞𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗡? (Most of us tend to have at least one) 𝙏𝙃𝙍𝙊𝙒 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙈 𝙊𝙐𝙏!!! The inimitable Judith Enck from Beyond Plastics gives an articulate and sobering argument why these articles should NEVER feature in your kitchen (I use wood or metal). Although black plastic makes up 15% of all plastic recyclables (largely single-use food containers), the vast majority is not recycled because the infrared technology used by recycling facilities to sort plastics cannot “see” the color black. As a result of this failure, most black plastic items end up in our landfills, incinerators, oceans and rivers after just a single use. Due to the lack of recycled black plastic, the demand is often met using e-waste (discarded electronics like old computers, phones, TVs, monitors, speakers, and appliances) that contain toxic chemicals such as phthalates, flame retardants, and heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, and mercury. These chemical-laced plastics are melted down, mixed with food grade plastics and turned into children’s toys, single-use utensils and coffee stirrers, hot cup lids, cooking implements, insulated mugs, jewelry, garden hoses, and holiday decorations, among other items. Although existing safety regulations limit the amounts of these chemicals and metals present in electronics, there are currently NO government regulations covering the safety of recycled black plastic items. Therefore, high levels of toxic chemicals that are prohibited in your laptop or phone are perfectly legal in your black plastic fork, spatula, slotted spoon, or hot cup lid. A 2018 University of Plymouth study found toxic chemicals present at up to 30 times the levels considered safe in a full 40 percent of the black plastic toys, thermoses, cocktail stirrers, and utensils tested. Please pass on and share... A simple move for your health and that of your loved ones https://lnkd.in/eTBnQw5Q Amanda Ellis Katarina Kohen Vermilye Marie-Laure Schaufelberger, CFA Rajesh Chandy Christopher Large Alexis Eyre Georgia Elliott-Smith Dr Fiona Pathiraja-Møller Sarah Jeffs Katell. Le Goulven, PhD Bianca Pitt Cindy Forde Esmeralda de Belgique Mamta Borgoyary Natalie Sifuma Florence Miller
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Creativity in the Face of Environmental Change The recent ban on single-use plastics has brought significant changes across various industries, and the party-planning sector is no exception. One of the most noticeable impacts has been on the availability of sweet cones—a beloved party favour for children and adults alike. As manufacturers discontinue plastic sweet cone bags, these once-common treats are becoming rare finds. However, this shift presents an exciting opportunity for party professionals and sweet suppliers to explore creative and sustainable alternatives for sweet presentations. Sweet cones have been a staple at children’s parties for years. Typically, these cones are plastic bags filled with an assortment of colourful sweets, sealed with a twist tie or ribbon. Easy to make, visually appealing and always a hit with party goers. Yet, with increasing #EnvironmentalAwareness and legislative action against single-use plastics, the #SweetCone is quickly fading from the party scene. This need not spell the end of these delightful #PartyFavours. Instead, it opens the door to more eco-friendly and innovative presentations. Here are some alternatives to consider: Swap plastic for #biodegradable options like paper or compostable cellophane bags. These materials decompose much faster than plastic and can be decorated just as beautifully. Small mason jars are a charming and reusable option. They can be filled with sweets and decorated with ribbons or custom labels. Glassine envelopes, these smooth glossy paper envelopes are both biodegradable and resistant to air and grease. It’s perfect for presenting sweets elegantly while being kind to the environment. Drawstring fabric pouches made from cotton or burlap offer a rustic, reusable alternative. Small, decorated cardboard boxes can be used to hold sweets. They are sturdy, recyclable, and can be customised to fit any party theme. Why not make the container part of the treat? Edible options like waffle cones, chocolate cups, or candy bowls can hold sweets and be enjoyed along with the contents. Using origami techniques to fold decorative paper into cones can create beautiful, eco-friendly entirely biodegradable sweet holders. Plant-able Seed Paper Bags are an innovative bag, made from paper embedded with seeds. After enjoying the sweets, guests can plant the bag and grow flowers or herbs. The phase-out of single-use plastic sweet cones marks a significant change in party planning, pushing us towards more sustainable practices. While the loss of the traditional sweet cone may be felt, the myriad of creative alternatives available ensures that party favours remain a highlight of any celebration. Embracing these changes can lead to more beautiful, thoughtful, and environmentally friendly party experiences. So, let’s welcome this opportunity to innovate and create new traditions that align with our values and our vision for a #sustainable future. #PartyPlanning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Ever wondered about the true sustainability of reusable grocery bags? ♻ ✅ Despite their eco-friendly reputation, reusable bags may have a higher carbon footprint if not utilized efficiently. ✅ Meanwhile, many shoppers fail to maximize the potential of their reusable bags and opt for frequent replacements instead. ✅ To make a real difference, it's crucial to prioritize reusing existing bags rather than continuously acquiring new ones. In the context of sustainable liquidation for businesses dealing with excess and overstock, this underscores the significance of optimizing existing resources. Just as reusing bags is essential for environmental preservation, effectively managing surplus inventory can minimize business waste and uphold sustainability objectives. 👉 Pollen is here to help you manage your stocks better by automating work streams, unlocking the power of pricing analytics, and empowering teams to take action for more sustainable outcomes. Learn more about what we do at https://www.pollen.tech/
~100-150 uses is the estimated #breakeven #carbon #footprint for #reusable #bags vs. #plastic ones… That’s a lot of trips to the store 🏪 , and this got me thinking about how #sustainability is #taught and #explained. #Background: My daughters are learning about sustainability in school and naturally shared their disdain for plastic bags. No brainer 🧠 to me, but then next to our front door, I see ~7 or 8 reusable bags hanging there. Curiosity set in and I did a bit of research. The answer to #breakeven #carbon #footprints is basically #too #complex to accurately calculate with so many variables and inputs. But, what’s clear is #HOW #we #consume vs. #WHAT #we #consume -our #behaviors - is far and away the most important factor. So, why isn’t teaching behavior stressed more? 🤔 … #Tension #Points: ✴ #Simple vs. #Hard #Truths - In this increasingly binary world, “bogey man” 😱, overly simplified arguments seem to rule. Plastic bags are easily #relatable and highly #visible 🔎 - quickly identifiable in our streets as #litter or in our oceans as floating #garbage #patches. The hard truth is that we don’t #USE plastic bags as intended by inventor Sten Gustaf Thuin, who envisioned #saving #forests 🌲 (less paper bags) and #high #reuse #rates. Another hard truth is reusable bags overall are likely worse environmentally - unless, each individual bag is used 100+ times but who’s counting?… ✴ #Action vs. #Follow #through - A challenge for more #sustainable #outcomes, in my opinion, lies in the #bridge 🌉 #between #actions and #behaviors. A participation action such as buying a reusable bag is easy and feels good - we are #saving #the #planet 🌏 - but using that bag 100+ times is #hard. It’s a commitment, a new muscle memory to form #habits. Unlike workouts, trackable on Apple Watch, I don’t know how to easily and systematically measure how my behaviors influence my environmental impact… Doing what’s right may not be measurable but how does this slot into our digital 💻 , everything is trackable world?… So what’s one to do and what’s one to teach 📊 ?… For my daughters, the lessons are simple 1) “#use #what #you #have” - enjoy them as many times as you can, and 2) “#be #a #critical #thinker” - as the answer is often times much more nuanced. At Pollen, we are helping companies #build #new #muscles 🏋♀️ and habits as it relates to #unsold #inventory and #liquidation 📦 . By leveraging #data and #tech to impute and estimate recovery rates & #value 📈 (#not #cost), we are transforming liquidation from a #oneoff #haphazard #exercise into an #ongoing #systematic #workflow to unlock more #sustainable #outcomes. #startup #entrepreneurship #circularity #complicated #FMCG #brands #Singapore #Southeastasia #asia #analytics https://lnkd.in/ey6kuvRC
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Growing up I have seen my mother use only metal cooking utensils. It is only in the last few years that non-stick and/or plastic utensils have come into use. Little did anyone know (except those who make such plastics) that non stick utensils are simply plastic, and thus laced with toxins. Why do we really need non-stick utensils or plastic ones? Were we unable to cook eggs before such products existed? Were idlis and dosas not made in iron utensils for hundreds of years without sticking to the pan? As if this wasn't enough, recycling is being promoted as THE solution, without making the public aware of the fact all recycled plastics tend to be more toxic than non-recycled plastic due to additives of synthetic and toxic chemicals. Time to throw out all the teflon and plastics from the kitchen!
Focus is marine conservation but everything is connected. We cannot apply tunnel vision. Ask if externalities for solving Y create problems for X. Tries to apply humility and curiosity to solve 6th mass extinction
𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗬𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗗 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗦: 𝗛𝗔𝗩𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗚𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗘 𝗜𝗡 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗞𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗛𝗘𝗡? (Most of us tend to have at least one) 𝙏𝙃𝙍𝙊𝙒 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙈 𝙊𝙐𝙏!!! The inimitable Judith Enck from Beyond Plastics gives an articulate and sobering argument why these articles should NEVER feature in your kitchen (I use wood or metal). Although black plastic makes up 15% of all plastic recyclables (largely single-use food containers), the vast majority is not recycled because the infrared technology used by recycling facilities to sort plastics cannot “see” the color black. As a result of this failure, most black plastic items end up in our landfills, incinerators, oceans and rivers after just a single use. Due to the lack of recycled black plastic, the demand is often met using e-waste (discarded electronics like old computers, phones, TVs, monitors, speakers, and appliances) that contain toxic chemicals such as phthalates, flame retardants, and heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, nickel, chromium, and mercury. These chemical-laced plastics are melted down, mixed with food grade plastics and turned into children’s toys, single-use utensils and coffee stirrers, hot cup lids, cooking implements, insulated mugs, jewelry, garden hoses, and holiday decorations, among other items. Although existing safety regulations limit the amounts of these chemicals and metals present in electronics, there are currently NO government regulations covering the safety of recycled black plastic items. Therefore, high levels of toxic chemicals that are prohibited in your laptop or phone are perfectly legal in your black plastic fork, spatula, slotted spoon, or hot cup lid. A 2018 University of Plymouth study found toxic chemicals present at up to 30 times the levels considered safe in a full 40 percent of the black plastic toys, thermoses, cocktail stirrers, and utensils tested. Please pass on and share... A simple move for your health and that of your loved ones https://lnkd.in/eTBnQw5Q Amanda Ellis Katarina Kohen Vermilye Marie-Laure Schaufelberger, CFA Rajesh Chandy Christopher Large Alexis Eyre Georgia Elliott-Smith Dr Fiona Pathiraja-Møller Sarah Jeffs Katell. Le Goulven, PhD Bianca Pitt Cindy Forde Esmeralda de Belgique Mamta Borgoyary Natalie Sifuma Florence Miller
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
~100-150 uses is the estimated #breakeven #carbon #footprint for #reusable #bags vs. #plastic ones… That’s a lot of trips to the store 🏪 , and this got me thinking about how #sustainability is #taught and #explained. #Background: My daughters are learning about sustainability in school and naturally shared their disdain for plastic bags. No brainer 🧠 to me, but then next to our front door, I see ~7 or 8 reusable bags hanging there. Curiosity set in and I did a bit of research. The answer to #breakeven #carbon #footprints is basically #too #complex to accurately calculate with so many variables and inputs. But, what’s clear is #HOW #we #consume vs. #WHAT #we #consume -our #behaviors - is far and away the most important factor. So, why isn’t teaching behavior stressed more? 🤔 … #Tension #Points: ✴ #Simple vs. #Hard #Truths - In this increasingly binary world, “bogey man” 😱, overly simplified arguments seem to rule. Plastic bags are easily #relatable and highly #visible 🔎 - quickly identifiable in our streets as #litter or in our oceans as floating #garbage #patches. The hard truth is that we don’t #USE plastic bags as intended by inventor Sten Gustaf Thuin, who envisioned #saving #forests 🌲 (less paper bags) and #high #reuse #rates. Another hard truth is reusable bags overall are likely worse environmentally - unless, each individual bag is used 100+ times but who’s counting?… ✴ #Action vs. #Follow #through - A challenge for more #sustainable #outcomes, in my opinion, lies in the #bridge 🌉 #between #actions and #behaviors. A participation action such as buying a reusable bag is easy and feels good - we are #saving #the #planet 🌏 - but using that bag 100+ times is #hard. It’s a commitment, a new muscle memory to form #habits. Unlike workouts, trackable on Apple Watch, I don’t know how to easily and systematically measure how my behaviors influence my environmental impact… Doing what’s right may not be measurable but how does this slot into our digital 💻 , everything is trackable world?… So what’s one to do and what’s one to teach 📊 ?… For my daughters, the lessons are simple 1) “#use #what #you #have” - enjoy them as many times as you can, and 2) “#be #a #critical #thinker” - as the answer is often times much more nuanced. At Pollen, we are helping companies #build #new #muscles 🏋♀️ and habits as it relates to #unsold #inventory and #liquidation 📦 . By leveraging #data and #tech to impute and estimate recovery rates & #value 📈 (#not #cost), we are transforming liquidation from a #oneoff #haphazard #exercise into an #ongoing #systematic #workflow to unlock more #sustainable #outcomes. #startup #entrepreneurship #circularity #complicated #FMCG #brands #Singapore #Southeastasia #asia #analytics https://lnkd.in/ey6kuvRC
Research reveals the one major flaw with many reusable grocery bags: ‘We should try not [to] do that’
yahoo.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Pls Advice, The first synthetic plastic was produced in 1907, however its. mass production started in 1950 to a tune of 2 million tonnes per year, which has become around 400 million tonnes by 2023, that is indeed some progress. The truth that I have faced is that plastic is inescapable, however much one tries to be anti-plastic. In this heat one has to have water, and you are the least culprit if it's a 1 litre bottle because " Market Segmentation " & " Product Mix " teaches us that the product has to be available to the user as he pleases where he pleases and when he pleases. Any conference hall, any wedding hall or any public gathering one can see these smaller size bottles aplenty. We have known all this story for some years now, and data shows recycling is also increasing on a year on a year basis. But the rate of production is increasing at a much rapid rate the graph attached shows that by 2060 we would have crossed 1 billion tonnes of synthetic plastic. The problem and solution are staring at each other, this standoff is killing the bystanders. it's unfortunate but it's the truth. Plastic cannot be used in construction apart from pipelines due fire hazard, kitchen products might not be welcomed for logical reasons, Furniture seems to be the best viable product out of recycled plastic, this would be a two edged sword as it saves trees and kills plastic. But will you buy !? Keeping in mind the markup. I particularly don't have any grudge against plastic or specifically single use plastic they help me get vegetables, drink water in it, make anything waterproof etc. The issue started when it came to dispose of it. My mother would not let me throw it away, she would always keep all the polythene covers stacked in another big polythene cover. Where and when they were used I was kept oblivious of till today😃, now this tradition is being vehemently continued by my better half. So, I'm unable to escape plastic yet, if you have. " PLS ADVICE "
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I feel you on the plastic struggle - it's become so ingrained in our daily lives that it's hard to avoid completely. But you're right, the environmental toll can't be ignored any longer. On the social side, we need better eco-friendly alternatives that are just as convenient and affordable as plastic. Reusables help, but they're not a total solution. Maybe there's an opportunity for innovative plant-based or biodegradable materials to finally go mainstream. You also make a good point about recycled plastic furniture. If companies can find ways to make it durable, stylish and reasonably priced, I could totally see people getting behind that. Reducing new plastic production while repurposing existing waste? That's the kind of circular economy approach we need. No easy answers for sure. But the more we have real discussions and get creative about sustainable solutions, the better chance we have at getting plastic under control before it overwhelms the planet. I'm keen to explore ideas if you want to riff more!
Pls Advice, The first synthetic plastic was produced in 1907, however its. mass production started in 1950 to a tune of 2 million tonnes per year, which has become around 400 million tonnes by 2023, that is indeed some progress. The truth that I have faced is that plastic is inescapable, however much one tries to be anti-plastic. In this heat one has to have water, and you are the least culprit if it's a 1 litre bottle because " Market Segmentation " & " Product Mix " teaches us that the product has to be available to the user as he pleases where he pleases and when he pleases. Any conference hall, any wedding hall or any public gathering one can see these smaller size bottles aplenty. We have known all this story for some years now, and data shows recycling is also increasing on a year on a year basis. But the rate of production is increasing at a much rapid rate the graph attached shows that by 2060 we would have crossed 1 billion tonnes of synthetic plastic. The problem and solution are staring at each other, this standoff is killing the bystanders. it's unfortunate but it's the truth. Plastic cannot be used in construction apart from pipelines due fire hazard, kitchen products might not be welcomed for logical reasons, Furniture seems to be the best viable product out of recycled plastic, this would be a two edged sword as it saves trees and kills plastic. But will you buy !? Keeping in mind the markup. I particularly don't have any grudge against plastic or specifically single use plastic they help me get vegetables, drink water in it, make anything waterproof etc. The issue started when it came to dispose of it. My mother would not let me throw it away, she would always keep all the polythene covers stacked in another big polythene cover. Where and when they were used I was kept oblivious of till today😃, now this tradition is being vehemently continued by my better half. So, I'm unable to escape plastic yet, if you have. " PLS ADVICE "
To view or add a comment, sign in
-