Mike Ratcliffe’s Post

SHELL BACKS LNG - in April, I blogged that Shell was shifting its focus away from hydrogen towards LNG, especially for the transport market. The issue is that LNG only cuts GHGs by 23%, so is not the ultimate clean energy solution.  However, it does eliminate sulphur oxides and particulates, is far better for the environment than traditional bunker fuel, and can be seen as a bridge solution for companies like Shell as they head for NZE.  Shell has just added a page to its website clearly stating it's looking to back LNG for the marine market plus re-states its goal of virtually eliminating methane emissions from our operations by 2030, which seems extremely ambitious. It also points out the benefits of adding bio-LNG and synthetic LNG to the mix for shipping, allowing GHGs to be further cut, plus the fact that it has the largest LNG bunkering network with 26 locations around the world, plus 12 bunkering vessels. Does this herald a major push by Shell to shift the deepsea shipping market to LNG?  It would seem the answer is YES and so all you strategists out there with your scenario models of the future energy world should take note and up the importance of LNG! #scenarios #LNG #NZE #shipping #transportation #cleanenergy https://lnkd.in/eRdq45uD

LNG in shipping | Shell Global

LNG in shipping | Shell Global

shell.com

Rod Dowler

Independent business policy advisor

1mo

Also possible that Shell is on the wrong side of history.

Like
Reply
Leonard D. Lane

President at LLane Global Consult | Senior Executive | Board-Level Advisor | Expert in Global Strategy, Supply Chain Transformation & Sustainability | Business Professor

1mo

Shell has always been driven by optimizing it's asset base. In this case it's their 26 locations and locked in bunkering contracts. The move to LNG is a perfect example.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics