Cynefin is well known as a sense making framework to choose what strategy to adopt depending on in what space we operate. Not many use it though to understand what type of innovation they can expect.
When we are operating in a Simple domain, we can expect Incremental Innovation. We have something and we make it incrementally better: make a car go 5% faster, consume 10% less fuel.
It’s hard to distinguish one innovation result from another one.
If we move to a Complicated space, we can build something that is clearly Distinguishable from the previous iteration. It could have been the case of the first commercial vehicle that was powered by electricity instead of petrol.
It’s only when we arrive to the complex space that we can have Breakthrough innovation. Imagine a fully functioning self-driving car.
And then, through Disruptive Innovation, we need to enter the chaotic space. A space filled with unknown unknowns. A space where we don’t have yet the tools to study and understand what’s happening. A space where we need to feel fully comfortable with failing (or learning) fast.
I found particularly interesting how David Ross , made us notice how the most disruptive innovations, if adopted, eventually will become incremental ones: creating the first rocket to travel in space was hardly imaginable 100 years ago. Being on a rocket required to train a lifetime.
Now anyone can travel in space as a tourist investing a relatively “affordable” amount of money. Hardly any preparation required.
The type of innovation that we can expect doesn’t depend exclusively by the intrinsic nature of what we are working on but also by WHEN we are working on it.
How can we improve our changes to innovate? Obeyas room (whether they are physical, hybrid or entirely virtual on tools like Miro) can help a lot enabling cross-functional collaboration & allowing people to win their fears, possibly the biggest inhibitor to innovation.
#gsgnola24 #visagi