Natasha Kickett’s Post

Hope our hopping, jumping skipping leaders in PNG politics learn lesson to be true to the course of true leadership to impact change.

Understanding the Connection Between King Charles and Australia: Australia’s relationship with the British monarchy, now represented by King Charles III, is a fascinating blend of history and modern governance. Let’s break it down: In 1788, Australia became a British colony, later evolving into a federation in 1901. While gaining self-governance, Australia continued to recognize the British monarch as head of state. As King of Australia, Charles III holds a symbolic position, with no direct political authority. His representation in Australia is through the Governor-General, who acts on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister and Parliament. Australia does not pay any taxes to King Charles, though ceremonial events involving the monarchy may use public funds. Governance and policy decisions are entirely made within Australia, highlighting its sovereignty. Today, Australia remains part of the Commonwealth, a voluntary association of nations tied by shared history. The monarchy reflects traditions and identity linked to Australia’s past, serving as both a cultural symbol and a reminder of its colonial heritage. Is Australia’s current relationship with the monarchy a reminder of history or a call for change? Should it stay or move toward becoming a republic? Share your thoughts. #Australia #Monarchy #KingCharles #History #Politics

Figured I give some insight to treaties and a call to action. TRC call to action: 94. We call upon the Government of Canada to replace the Oath of Citizenship with the following: I swear (or affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors (King Charles now), and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada including Treaties with Indigenous Peoples, and fulfill my duties as a Canadian citizen. [6] Did you know: Between 1760 and 1923, the British Crown signed 56 land treaties with Indigenous Peoples. The ones we mainly see now are the numbered treaties. Curious to know if anyone recently swore an Oath of Citizenship to see if it was implemented?

1: On November 17, 284 A.D., Diocletian was proclaimed as emperor of Rome by his soldiers. He reigned from 284 to 305 A.D. After about a century of chaos in the Roman Empire, Diocletian brought stability, efficiency, and security to Rome during his just over two decades-long reign. 2: English monarch, Mary I, died on November 17, 1558, and Elizabeth Tudor came to the throne as Queen Elizabeth I. Queen Elizabeth I remained on the English throne until her death in 1603, which ended the Tudor dynasty and brought about the Stuart dynasty that began in 1603 with King James I who came from Scotland, and ended in 1714 with Queen Anne. 3: On November 17, 1800, the United States Congress held its first session in Washington, D.C. The very first session of the U.S. Congress was held on March 4, 1789, at Federal Hall in New York City. 4: The Suez Canal opened in Egypt on November 17, 1869, after ten years of construction. It is one of the world’s largest waterways and most significant trade routes. 5: British military officer, Field Marshal Bernard Law Montgomery, was born on November 17, 1887, in London. He was one of the biggest military officers in World War II (1939–1945), and he died on March 24, 1976. 6: On November 17, 2019, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in China. It was a 55-year-old Chinese citizen in the nation’s Hubei province. #History #WorldHistory #GlobalEvents #Asia #Australia #Europe #Africa #MiddleEast #CentralAmerica #NorthAmerica #SouthAmerica #USHistory

In corporate settings, understanding one’s role and place can be as essential as respecting long-standing traditions. Recently, I came across a fascinating protocol followed by the British monarchy: even Queen Elizabeth II refrained from sitting on the Iron Throne during a visit to the Game of Thrones set. (For those interested, you can check it out here: https://lnkd.in/gYAdrm-B). This custom underscores the value of knowing one’s place and respecting boundaries. However, at some corporate town halls, we see people positioning themselves in the front row or right beside top executives, hoping to be noticed. While ambition is vital, recognition is earned over time and through genuine contributions—not just by trying to be seen. The principle here is simple: “Know your place and embrace it.” Recognizing your position within an organization fosters authentic connections, strengthens teamwork, and creates a respectful work environment. After all, true impact is made through actions, not by where you sit in the room.

#EndlessMeetings ? Sir Winston Churchill wouldn’t approve. In #TheCrown, during his first meeting with Queen Elizabeth II, Churchill offers a lesson in efficiency; "Oh dear. Did no one explain? The Sovereign never offers a Prime Minister refreshment. Nor a chair. The precedent set by your great-great-grandmother was to keep us standing like Privy Councillors. To waste time is a grievous sin. If there is one thing I have learned in fifty-two years of public service, it is that there is no problem so complex, nor crisis so grave, that it cannot be satisfactorily resolved within twenty minutes. So... Shall we make a start?". Whether this quote is a historically accurate account or a brilliant creation by the show’s writers, its message remains undeniably relevant ; #Time is our most valuable resource - let’s use it wisely. #timemanagement #ExecutiveMBA

Rules are extremely harrowing. A rule's purpose may to keep discipline but isn't always used for that. They often are to check obedience, how far they can push before there is any resistance. Rules maintain autonomy even where it isn't needed for example the Royal Household of England although it is different since they created their own rules. When her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the 2nd was the sovereign of the nation the coat of arms was St. Edwards crown / coat of arms. St. Edwards crown is a beautiful elegant crown which is curved, it is extremely feminine .Ever since his Majesty King Charles Philip Arthur George became the Sovereign of the nation it changed to the Tudor crown or coat of arms, which is much more rounded. These rules for gender may seem excessive and unnecessary it shows that rules can be traditional that serve no purpose and that's fine. Not everything needs to have purpose some things can hang in the balance. Rules are important you need not resist them if they make no sense. Try and make sense out of the senseless that would be quite fun might even give you some sense of purpose.

Understanding the Connection Between King Charles and Australia The relationship between King Charles and Australia is deeply rooted in history and continues to evolve in the modern era. Here’s a concise overview: Historical Beginnings: Australia’s ties to the British monarchy began in 1788 as a British colony. In 1901, it became a federation, achieving self-governance while retaining the British monarch as the head of state. King Charles’ Role Today: As King of Australia, Charles III serves as the ceremonial head of state. His role is symbolic, with no political power, as Australia is governed by democratically elected leaders. The King is represented locally by the Governor-General, who acts on the advice of the Australian government. Modern Independence: Australia operates as a fully sovereign nation, making all governance decisions domestically. No financial tribute is paid to the King, though public funds are allocated for ceremonial events involving the monarchy. Cultural and Commonwealth Links: Australia remains part of the Commonwealth, a group of nations sharing historical connections to Britain. The monarchy symbolizes a shared heritage and continues to be part of Australia’s traditions and identity. Should Australia maintain its ties to the monarchy or move towards becoming a republic? Share your thoughts. #Australia #KingCharles #Monarchy #Republic #History 

PEOPLE OF COMMONWEALTH. AS THE LATE QUEEN ELIZABETH II OF UNITED KINGDOM REQUESTED KING CHARLES III THEN PRINCE OF WALES TO BE HEAD OF COMMONWEALTH. QUESTION IS THE IS THE HEAD OF COMMONWEALTH TITLE HEREDITRY TO UNITED KINGDOM MONARCHY OR IS IT TO BE ELECTION PROCESS BY DEMOCRATIC AND INDEPENDENT MEMBERS STATES? As of 2024, there are 15 Commonwealth realms: Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and the United Kingdom. While the Commonwealth of Nations has 56 independent member states, only these 15 have Charles III as head of state. He is also Head of the Commonwealth, a non-constitutional role. AS PART IF COMMONWEALTH IT IS A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE 15 MEMBER STATES TO ELECT A HEAD OF STATE VIA A DEMOCRATIC ELECTION PROCESS. UNITED KINGDOM IF DEEMED CAN REMAIN AS A COMMONWEALTH MEMBER STATE. A HEAD OF COMMONWEALTH TO BE SELECTED FROM THE 56 MEMBER STATE FOR A PERMANENT ROLE AND REPLACEMENT CAN BE SOUGHT IF OBJECTION RAISED BY MEMBER STATE OR STATES. The Commonwealth

The Strategic Foresight of Queen Elizabeth I: A Study in Impulse Control Queen Elizabeth I of England faced numerous challenges during her reign, including threats from foreign powers and internal dissent. Her ability to think strategically was key to her success as a ruler. One notable example is her decision to support the Dutch Revolt against Spain. Rather than acting impulsively, Elizabeth carefully considered the long-term implications of her actions, deciding to provide support only when she believed it would be most effective. Elizabeth's strategic foresight allowed her to navigate the complex political landscape of the time, ensuring England's stability and prosperity. For professionals, her leadership offers valuable lessons in the importance of self-discipline and the careful consideration of long-term consequences in decision-making. #QueenElizabethI #ImpulseControl #StrategicForesight #Leadership #History The Downfall of Impulsiveness: Lessons from King Louis XVI The reign of King Louis XVI of France serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of impulsive decision-making. Louis XVI's inability to control his impulses, particularly in the face of financial crises and popular unrest, contributed to the French Revolution and his downfall. One of his most significant impulsive decisions was the attempted escape from Paris, which was poorly planned and executed. This act further alienated the king from his subjects and hastened the revolution. The failure of Louis XVI to exercise impulse control and strategic thinking highlights the importance of self-discipline in leadership. For modern professionals, this historical example underscores the dangers of impulse. https://buff.ly/3XdeEI2