𝗔 𝗕𝘂𝗹𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝘆𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆
Excerpts: "It was part of Madison’s genius, supported by Alexander Hamilton and the other founders, to have forged a species of popular rule that carefully modulated the passions of the masses in such a way that protected individual liberty in the face of the imperatives of democracy. Hence the Electoral College, which is a primary mechanism for preserving federalism. Hence, too, two senators to every state: why should Wyoming, say, be swamped by the ethos of California? Such expedients are not bugs but features of a dispensation whose aim is to preserve a canvas for individual liberty. You may have noticed that the loudest voices among Democrats chanting about 'our democracy' aren’t much interested in preserving individual liberty. They’re interested instead in the acquisition and retention of power, on the one hand, and the exercise of social control, on the other."
"There is a sense, then, in which [Erwin] Chemerinsky and like-minded critics are right about the Constitution being 'antidemocratic.' It is antidemocratic in the sense that it is pro-republic. Which is to say that the Constitution is primarily about circumscribing the coercive power of the government. 𝗔𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗙𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝟱𝟭, '𝗜𝗻 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝗻, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀: 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗱; 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳.' 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗮 𝗯𝘂𝗹𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗲, 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝘆𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗻𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆."
by Roger Kimball
Source: https://lnkd.in/dqzk-68Z
(Democracy in America: An Introduction, October 2024)
The New Criterion
Senior Executive | MPA | Corporate Affairs | Policy | Media | Government Relations | Stakeholder Communications | AI Curious
8moAmelia Loye Millie Rooney