Osvaldo Coelho’s Post

https://lnkd.in/gsk95nMP How the US and its Partners can Ensure the World’s Data Super-Highways Remain Reliable, Secure, Open & Free By Alex Botting & Inés Jordan-Zoob on July 15, 2024 The recommendations in this article are informed by current realities, including:  A significant increase in cable deployments in the coming years driven by increased bandwidth and increased route diversity demands; increased risk of espionage and sabotage in a world of heightened geopolitical tensions;  a stated desire in Chinese Communist Party industrial policy to significantly increase the market share of Chinese suppliers;  the limitations of existing international and multilateral institutions to address risks;  less awareness of the geopolitical implications of cable security in comparison to the discourse around 5G security; and the global governance challenges for national governments due to jurisdictional limitations, multiple national agencies with remit, outdated legislation, and ownership of the optical core infrastructure supply chain being largely private.

Capitalist interests have precedence over all other things, including the reality (Q1, Q2, Q3). Q1: "The planned phase-out, reported by Reuters on Wednesday, starts with a first stage in which operators will remove Chinese-made technology from the country's core network of 5G data centres in 2026." Q2: "In the second stage, Chinese makers of parts such as antennas, transmission lines and towers will be eliminated by 2029." Q3: "Germany is considered a laggard in implementing the European Union's security measures for 5G networks." https://lnkd.in/g8CVT7iT

Knowledge is Power... Protecting Critical Networks with Integrated Quantum Approach Q&A with Nokia https://https://lnkd.in/dCnZC9pi

A new report on internet disruptions from content delivery network provider Cloudflare Inc., released today, finds that the main cause of disruptions in the first quarter was damage to terrestrial and submarine cables, followed by government-direct internet shutdowns, cyberattacks, technical issues and power outages. That damage to submarine cables led the pack for internet disruptions in the […] The post Cloudflare reports submarine and terrestrial cable damages lead recent internet disruptions appeared first on SiliconANGLE.

The CSIS report highlights the importance of undersea cables, which carry over 95% of the world's international data. These cables are crucial for global internet connectivity, government communications, and economic activities. The report emphasizes that these cables are vulnerable to threats from countries like China and Russia, which could potentially exploit or sabotage them. It also mentions that China has been expanding its role in the undersea cable industry, which raises concerns for U.S. national security. To address these vulnerabilities, the CSIS report suggests that the U.S. and its allies should invest in building stronger repair and maintenance capacities for these cables, streamline legal processes for cable construction, and enhance international cooperation to protect this critical infrastructure. The goal is to ensure that these vital communication lines remain secure and reliable, especially in the face of growing geopolitical tensions.

How will Europe's bold move to phase out Chinese 5G equipment reshape the future of digital security and economic stability across the continent and beyond? Germany’s recent decision to phase out Chinese equipment from its 5G networks has sparked a crucial conversation about safeguarding digital infrastructure while navigating economic realities in Europe. The intricate challenge of balancing supply, security, and cost is at the forefront of this pivotal development. As Europe grapples with this complex dilemma, it's essential to consider the implications of this decision on the future of 5G technology in the region and beyond. The financial burden of replacing Chinese telecom equipment across Europe is substantial, with estimates reaching billions of dollars. However, promising alternatives like Open Radio Access Network (OpenRAN) technology offer potential solutions, albeit with their own set of challenges. The outcome of this endeavor will not only shape Europe’s digital landscape but also influence global approaches to 5G security. How do you think the shift away from Chinese equipment will impact the future of 5G technology in Europe and beyond? Share your thoughts! #5GSecurity #DigitalInfrastructure #EuropeanTech #OpenRAN

Advertisement Germany’s recent decision to phase out Chinese equipment from its 5G networks highlights Europe’s intricate challenge: safeguarding digital infrastructure while navigating economic realities. Replacing Huawei, a dominant player, presents a complex equation with logistical hurdles and hefty price tags. For example, the United States’ effort to “rip and replace” Huawei equipment has run up against funding constraints and supply chain issues. As of July, only 14 companies have completed the move away from Huawei and ZTE, according to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 authorized the agency to reimburse providers…

How will Europe's bold move to phase out Chinese 5G equipment reshape the future of digital security and economic stability across the continent and beyond? Germany’s recent decision to phase out Chinese equipment from its 5G networks has sparked a crucial conversation about safeguarding digital infrastructure while navigating economic realities in Europe. The intricate challenge of balancing supply, security, and cost is at the forefront of this pivotal development. As Europe grapples with this complex dilemma, it's essential to consider the implications of this decision on the future of 5G technology in the region and beyond. The financial burden of replacing Chinese telecom equipment across Europe is substantial, with estimates reaching billions of dollars. However, promising alternatives like Open Radio Access Network (OpenRAN) technology offer potential solutions, albeit with their own set of challenges. The outcome of this endeavor will not only shape Europe’s digital landscape but also influence global approaches to 5G security. How do you think the shift away from Chinese equipment will impact the future of 5G technology in Europe and beyond? Share your thoughts! #5GSecurity #DigitalInfrastructure #EuropeanTech #OpenRAN

𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞 – Federal regulators loosen grip on the CBRS rules near the East, West, and Gulf Coasts. See how it's great news for the telecom industry. Network deployments in these coastal territories were previously explicitly reserved for the U.S. Navy. The CBRS spectrum usage by other telecom players was opened up in 2020 prior to which it was only used by DoD and some fixed satellite operators. Preston Marshall, OnGo Alliance chairman and director of wireless policy and standards at Google, confirmed that zero cases of interference with the U.S. Navy have been reported since that time. In line with these results, DoD decided to drastically shrink the “highly-protected” areas against interference, leaving a HUGE space open for private telecom companies to do business with enterprises in this area. Here’s why it's favourable news for businesses in the telecom industry. • Enterprises can now invest in private network technology confidently. • This news opens up a new market for players in the private telecom industry. • More private network deployments in the 3550-3700 MHz band are expected in this area. • Businesses in the area will no longer be forced to use WiFi as the only connectivity option. • Enterprises can deploy private networks to avoid WiFi costs and service costs to mobile network operators. • Previously, there were fears that the enterprise’s network could be removed from the spectrum to protect the U.S. Navy. • When these areas were protected, a handful of companies like Google had the tech to calculate interferences with the U.S. Navy radio waves. Thus, they had a monopoly. Since the ban was lifted, Google can expect competition from alternatives such as Sony, Nokia, Amdocs, and Key Bridge Wireless. The regulations for this change are in the final process with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Implementations are expected by the end of summer. This feat also shows the government’s willingness to cooperate with the private sector, and who knows what such collaborations could unlock in the future! Excited to know more about how private 5G can solve your connectivity issues and help your businesses grow? Book a free 30-minute call with our expert → https://shorturl.at/yR00g

**Protection of Submarine Cables: Securing Digital Infrastructure in an Era of Great Power Competition** 🌐 Submarine fiber optic cables, essential for information and communication technologies (ICT), carry more than 95% of international data. These infrastructures, which include around 600 cables spanning a total of 1.2 million kilometers worldwide, are at the heart of competition between the United States, China, and other actors like Russia. They are indispensable for cloud computing, 5G networks, video streaming, financial transactions, as well as diplomatic communications and essential intelligence. The rise of artificial intelligence will further increase the demand for these resources. **Ownership, Control, and Challenges** 🌍 Submarine cables are primarily built, owned, and maintained by private companies. Four companies dominate the global market: SubCom (United States), Alcatel Submarine Networks (France), Nippon Electric Company (Japan), and HMN Technologies (China). These companies often lease the capacity of their cables through indefeasible rights of use (IRUs). China, with its Digital Silk Road initiative, has become a key player, although recent security concerns have restricted its participation in some projects. **Vulnerabilities and Risks** 🚨 Submarine cables are vulnerable to various factors, ranging from accidental human interactions to extreme weather conditions. Damage from fishing equipment or anchors is frequent, with around 100 to 150 cables damaged each year. Additionally, these infrastructures are potential targets for sabotage or "gray zone" attacks. For instance, in 2023, Chinese ships were accused of cutting cables serving Taiwan's Matsu Islands. Incidents in the Baltic Sea and the Red Sea have also raised concerns. **Recommendations for Protecting Submarine Cables** 🛡️ 1. **Strengthen international cooperation**: The United States and its allies should use international financial institutions to support cable projects and compete with Chinese and Russian companies. 2. **Improve repair capabilities**: Increase funding for cable repair and streamline permit processes to enhance network resilience. 3. **Develop legal frameworks**: Establish a coherent international legal framework to protect submarine cables and prevent sabotage. 4. **Simplify authorization processes**: Reduce the complexity of permit processes to accelerate the installation and repair of cables. For more details, consult the full study: https://lnkd.in/e-JjNrYF #DigitalSecurity #SubmarineCables #Infrastructure #GeopoliticalCompetition #Protection #Technology #CyberSecurity