Pablo Andrés Muquillaza Cabrera’s Post

With sustainability in mind, Port of Rotterdam sets tariffs for next 3 years In line with its goal to become carbon-neutral by 2050, the Dutch Port of Rotterdam Authority has set the port’s tariffs for the next three years, placing special emphasis on sustainability. Summary: The Port of Rotterdam is taking significant strides toward sustainability with a newly structured tariff system aimed at promoting efficient and eco-friendly shipping. In line with its carbon-neutral target by 2050, the port authority will implement updated seaport and inland port dues from January 1, 2025. Key changes include: Sustainability-Based Tariffs: For seagoing vessels, dues will now consider the vessel's Environmental Ship Index (ESI) score, incentivizing higher environmental performance. Vessels with Green Award certifications will also receive discounts. Additionally, port dues will be lower per tonne of cargo if the ship’s capacity is efficiently utilized, reducing emissions per transshipped tonne. Inland Port Dues: A 5% sustainability contribution is being added to inland port dues for motorized vessels, with the additional revenue earmarked for sustainability initiatives in inland shipping. Operators can offset this increase by sharing emissions data, benefiting from up to a 100% discount depending on their Green Award certification level (Bronze to Platinum). Encouraging Sustainable Fuels: Ships that bunker sustainable fuels in Rotterdam will continue to receive reduced port fees, supporting the port’s commitment to zero-emission maritime practices under the Zero Emissions Maritime Buyers Alliance (ZEMBA). This tariff overhaul, Rotterdam’s first since 2022, simplifies the dues system while supporting the port’s sustainability and competitiveness. It represents a collaborative effort with key stakeholders like Deltalinqs and the Association of Rotterdam Shipbrokers and Agents (VRC), incentivizing both maritime and inland operators to adopt cleaner, more efficient practices. #PortOfRotterdam #SustainableShipping #GreenPort #CarbonNeutral #EnvironmentalIncentives #ShippingEfficiency #GreenAward #InlandShipping #ESI #CleanEnergyPorts

Tariffs are protectionist measures to pamper domestic industries that have lost their competitive edge at the expense of local consumers, and in this case, perhaps more importantly, to the detriment of the global climate. One should be grateful to every government that is incentivizing the development of highly competitive markets for cleaner technologies that help to address climate change. After EV subsidies have been hastily scrapped in Germany and elsewhere, those looking to reduce their mobility-related emissions, are now forced to subsidize pollution. It would have been wise to announce along with the tariffs that 100% of the resulting revenue will be turned into subsidies for buyers of small, locally produced EVs. For the time being this looks like an utterly counterproductive measure, not just compromising climate ambition but hurting the business climate.

Ports Ministry Issues Draft Of Migration Of Tariff Guidelines For Comments In the past, tariffs were regulated due to a limited competitive landscape, but the evolving market necessitated deregulation. The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways (MOPSW) has issued a draft of the Migration of Tariff Guidelines, 2024, for comments. The guidelines are for adoption of Market Determined Tariff for PPP projects under Guidelines for Regulation of Tariff 2005, Guidelines for Upfront Tariff Setting for PP Projects 2008, Guidelines for Determination of Tariff for Projects 2013 & Tariff Guidelines 2019. In the past, tariffs were regulated due to a limited competitive landscape, but the evolving market necessitated deregulation. The migration was deemed pertinent since, with the transition to the land-lord port model and increased private sector participation, the utility of tariff regulations (and fixation) had diminished. In addition, intra-port parity and competition, parity with respect to non-major ports, consistent user experience and a level playing field for PPP operators dictated this transition. To address this disparity, a committee was formed by the MOPSW for deliberation regarding the migration of existing PPP concessionaires to a market-driven tariff regime as prescribed in Tariff Guidelines 2021.Ministry of Ports , Shipping and Waterways (India) #tariff #ports

The EU's imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles marks a pivotal moment for the industry, potentially reshaping the landscape for sustainable transport in Europe. 🚗💨 It's driven by a mix of protecting local industries and maintaining fair trade practices, pushing back against what the European Commission views as "unfair" state subsidies supporting Chinese EV production. Interestingly, there's a window of opportunity here - a four-month period where provisional tariffs will apply, leaving room for negotiation and possibly a more amicable solution. It's a signal for businesses to reflect and adapt. For those in the sustainable transport sector, the need to innovate and remain competitive has never been more pressing. 🔍 Against this backdrop of trade tensions and shifting policies, our role at Net Zero Evolution couldn't be more critical. We understand that getting ahead and staying there means leveraging these developments to your advantage. 🌱 Here's the puzzle to solve - how can your business not just navigate but thrive in this altered marketplace? 🤔 Whether it's diversifying supply chains, innovating product offerings, or upskilling your team, we're on hand to steer you towards growth and sustainability. How do you plan to respond to the EU's latest trade measures, and where could your strategy benefit from a recruitment and consultancy partner who champions your commitment to a greener future? 🌍 Let us know your thoughts in the comments below. #SustainableTransport #TradePolicy #NetZeroEvolution

I like tariffs .. Carbon intensity tariffs. As an economist I prefer government role addressing externalities, e.g., pollution and transborder emissions. Legislation has already been crafted. #tariffs #carbontariffs #CBAM #carbonborderadjustedmechanism Senator Ron Wyden https://lnkd.in/gnFznkSS.

🇪🇺 The European Union is expected to levy tariffs on Chinese-made EVs tomorrow - anticipated to be between approximately 15%-30% - only days after Great Wall Motor Deutschland GmbH shut down its European HQ in Munich ⛔ 🗣 Expect reciprocal tariff reprisals to begin (think French cognac and cheese) 🧀 🤔 To recap: the European renewable energy sector says Chinese companies are undercutting the EU by 50%, and the subsidy probe will likely reveal a range of unfair trading practises that disadvantage EU companies directly 💶 🗣 But Bedford Analysis expects the impact on the outflow of Chinese-made EVs to the EU to remain consistent, given the relative cost advantages afforded these products can readily absorb tariff shocks 🚙 🗣 President Xi Jinping will see this as an acid test of his economic-industrial market resilience and renewable energy dominance 💹 🗣 But can the EU afford to desinicise? 🤔 #geopolitics #criticalminerals #bedfordanalysis

⚡New Publication in Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics In the recently published article “Carbon reduction in global supply network design subject to carbon tariffs and location-specific carbon policies”, Jens Christian and Florian S. analyze the impact of carbon tariffs on global supply network design. Carbon tariffs are gaining importance as the European Commission has enacted the so-called Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. The authors show that combining carbon tariffs with existing location-specific carbon policies fundamentally changes the economic and environmental consequences for the network design. More details can be found at the link of the open access article: https://lnkd.in/gn45PNhg #SupplyNetwork #SupplyNetworkDesign #CarbonTariffs #CarbonFootprint

At a high level picture, this argument makes sense. We have established that it is politically and in the short-term economically expedient for EU to set tariffs on Chinese EVs, even if the accusations are not true. (They are, but the truth is kind of mixed. But the WTO rules allow for it - arguably.) But just like the overly simplistic claim that the world produces enough food, but we are not getting it where it is needed - as if this a logistics puzzle to be solved- not a market problem, coupled with social economics of have and have nots; this green transition argument that EV tariffs is a loss for green is nonsense. EVs reduce emissions on the road. They also produce more brake dust and tire dust. Just because we have not measured those before (because emissions was a bigger problem). EVs are not necc green especially in winter. Because renewables are poorer at powegen in winter and better in summer - in general, so we need more dirty power gen to balance the clean power gen. (And no one is going to pay someone to store electricity in batteries for months). And last but not least EVs are not the answer, public transportation and EV public transports are a better one. (And China got that covered too). EU is nowhere near converting to almost green energy - unless they go nuclear. There is a desert to the south in the shape of Sahara but let's also get real, the cost of transmitting the energy will only make sense if EU charges electricity usage to 10x what it is. And kill its economies. EV takeup rates are slowing in EU - that has nothing to do with tariffs. And these include hybrids, PHEVs, BEVs as a whole. Now I am not defending the tariffs - I am only saying that complaints that the tariffs are bad because it interferes with green transition is overblown. EU's green transition is a lie - use more energy without having to pay more is cakeism with six feet of green washing.

Imposing Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicles Will Make the EU’s Transition Slower and More Expensive THE RISKS OF TARIFFS ON DECARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGIES The EU is anxious to protect its companies from what it sees as unfair competition. It has bitter memories of the early 2010s, when cheap Chinese panels all but destroyed the European solar industry.  The EU is right to identify clean technology as a crucial strategic industry, and to take action to mitigate the negative consequences of surging imports from China. Against a volatile geopolitical backdrop, it can be worth paying a premium for goods made at home. THE COSTS OF EUROPEAN MANUFACTURE The EU wants these to be manufactured within its borders. In her 2023 State of the Union address, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was unequivocal: the EU’s clean tech future should be made in Europe.  The Green Deal Industrial Plan, announced in early 2023, seeks to do this by cutting red tape, increasing access to finance, boosting skills, and promoting fair trade. The Net Zero Industry Act sets a target for the EU to manufacture at least 40 per cent of the so-called strategic net zero technologies it deploys each year, by 2030.  The Act proposes to achieve this through measures including requiring public authorities to consider non-price ‘sustainability and resilience’ criteria when procuring renewable energy. This would in theory increase the attractiveness of goods made on European soil.  However, this requirement can be disregarded if it implies ‘disproportionate’ additional costs. It is therefore doubtful it will be enough to offset the large difference in production costs between Chinese- and EU-made solar panels, for example.  Building the factories needed to hit the Act’s manufacturing targets for solar panels and batteries is estimated to require nearly $70 billion by 2030.  But unlike in the United States, where the Inflation Reduction Act offers lavish subsidies, the EU’s Green Deal Industrial Plan provides little in the way of new finance.  https://lnkd.in/gEGyZT6V

The escalating trade tension between the EU and China over EV tariffs poses significant challenges. Germany's resistance and France's support highlight the divide. EU's decision on provisional duties of up to 37.6% will be a crucial step. This could impact both European consumers and carmakers. Balancing fair competition and maintaining climate goals is critical. 🌍🔧 For more insights, read the full article: https://lnkd.in/eVkwx_Sj #EV #TradeWars #SustainableMobility #EUChina #AutomotiveIndustry #ClimateGoals #FairTrade