Paul Burbage’s Post

View profile for Paul Burbage, graphic

Senior Trainer/Clinical Practitioner and Coach at Studio3

"However, it is universally recognised that solitary confinement is inherently punitive. It indicates that the prisoner is being denied any active interaction/engagement with others, often because of a violent act." "Although LTS and seclusion in healthcare settings is often initiated because of the threat of violence toward others, it does not preclude active engagement with staff. Patients under LTS may spend significant periods of the day with others" Although LTS and seclusion in healthcare settings is often initiated because of the threat of violence toward others, it does not preclude active engagement with staff. Patients under LTS 'may spend significant periods of the day with others'. How can S/LTS on 'risk' grounds extending beyond that immediate, clear, imminent risk not be called solitary confinement and not be considered punitive? Critique? Or maintaining the status quo through justifying the current system? Resistance to reform or change because of the current systems framework and requiring evidence for change despite what a lot of this could be changed on Human Rights grounds, common sense perspectives, trauma informed approaches, and just plain therapeutic care and respect of vulnerable human being? https://lnkd.in/ebZr_BhT

Long-term segregation and seclusion for people with an intellectual disability and/or autism in hospitals: critique of the current state of affairs | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core

Long-term segregation and seclusion for people with an intellectual disability and/or autism in hospitals: critique of the current state of affairs | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core

cambridge.org

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics