R upendra shetty’s Post

Decoding NEET UG 2024 fiasco The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), a pivotal examination for aspiring medical students in India, has found itself entangled in a web of controversy. The exam happened on May 5 and about 24 lakh students appeared for the exams. From the contentious awarding of grace marks to allegations of question paper leaks, the aftermath of this year's exam has left students, parents, and policymakers grappling with questions of fairness, transparency, and the future of medical education. THE CONTROVERSY 1. 67 students scored a perfect 720. 2. As per the marking pattern every right answer gets +4, every wrong answer gets -1, and abstaining from answering gets 0; it is impossible to score 718 and 719 as scored by AIR 68 and 69 respectively. 3. Eight students from the same exam center in Haryana bearing similar roll numbers secured AIR 62 to 69 which seems fishy. 4. Grace marks were awarded for loss of time to 1563 students from Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, and Chhattisgarh who had approached the courts due to the various discrepancies. SOLUTIONS: The NEET UG 2024 controversy has raised concerns about fairness and integrity. Here are some steps to avoid such issues in the future: 1. Enhanced security measures *Strengthen security during exam administration to prevent leaks. 2. Randomisation of questions *Randomise questions to minimize the impact of leaks. *This ensures that no single leaked question disproportionately affects candidates. 3. Diverse question formats *Introduce varied question formats beyond MCQs. *Include short answer questions, case-based scenarios, and practical assessments. 4. Transparent communication *Regularly update students about exam processes and security measures. *Transparency builds trust and reduces speculation. 5. Independent oversight: *Establish an independent body to oversee exam conduct and address complaints. *This ensures impartiality and accountability. 6. Swift investigation and response: *Investigate the allegations promptly. 7. Online exam *Like JEE exam, NEET UG can also be held as an online exam where technology allows transparency. Continuous improvement is essential to uphold the integrity of critical exams like NEET where the expectations of lakhs of students are at stake.

Pleased to see a 14% increase in Chinese undergraduate applications for early deadline courses through UCAS. It's a strong start for what's set to be a busy and competitive cycle for universities and accommodation providers. These figures show that Chinese growth is a major contributor to the 4.7% increase for internationals generally at this 15th October deadline, and the 1.3% overall growth including domestic students. https://lnkd.in/eqfMgNdJ.

NEET Result 2024 Controversy Live Updates: Petitions filed in Supreme Court for re test and against grace marks (Hindustan Times) NEET Result 2024 Controversy Live Updates: Amid a widespread cry to cancel the medical entrance examination NEET UG 2024 petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging the National Testing Agency’s (NTA) decision to award grace marks to around 1,600 students. The petitioners have also requested the top court’s directions to scrap the results and hold the test again, Live Law has reported. …Read More There is growing dissatisfaction among students and parents regarding this year’s undergraduate medical entrance examination. Some students got 718 and 719 marks, and some scored 720 marks to become toppers, which was possible because of NTA’s decision to award grace marks to them. In a press conference last week, NTA’s Director-General pointed out that the decision to give grace marks was taken as per a committee’s recommendation. It added that those candidates were affected by time loss due to the distribution of wrong question papers and/or torn OMR sheets. Another four-member committee has been formed to review the issue. The agency said a final decision, including the possibility of a re-examination, will be made after the committee submits a report, which is likely within a week. Meanwhile, Opposition politicians, including Rahul Gandhi of the Congress, Akhilesh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party, and Sanjay Singh of the Aam Admi Party, have taken a dig at the government over the NEET exam controversy. Rahul Gandhi, in a social media Post, said that he would be the voice of the students in the Parliament and raise issues related to their future. MK Stalin, the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu—a state that has a long history of opposing the national-level medical entrance examination (NEET)— has reiterated that his party was the first to foresee its disadvantages. Get all the latest developments related to the NEET exam controversy below: Follow all the updates here: June 10, 2024 5:46 PM<!-- --> IST NEET Result 2024 Controversy Live Updates: Check information shared by Kerala Congress Committee NEET Result 2024 Controversy Live Updates: Kerala Congress Committee has shared marksheet of a student on its Twitter handle along with this update, “A child who got 705/720 marks and a rank of 1321 in NEET 2024. His/her 12th standard marks card says the child failed in Physics (21%), Chemistry (31%) and in Biology passed with 39% marks. We are not blaming the child for this rank. We are blaming the system @NTA_Exams which has destroyed the lives of lakhs of aspiring children who spent several years studying for this exam to fulfil their dream of becoming a doctor and serve the country! Heads must roll for this criminal manipulation. Price must be exacted from those criminals who forced children to suicide!” June 10, 2024 4:55 PM<!-- --> IST NEET Result 2024

NEET 2024 Controversy: Impact on Students and Future Implications The NEET 2024 controversy has left students and parents in a state of uncertainty and frustration. Allegations of mismanagement and malpractice have cast a shadow over the credibility of this crucial medical entrance examination. Many students have reported inconsistencies in question papers and unfair advantages given to certain candidates. The controversy has not only impacted the morale of students but also raised concerns about the future of medical education in India. As authorities delve into the matter, the education community hopes for stringent measures to prevent such issues in the future and restore faith in the examination system. Read here: https://lnkd.in/g5JEXF9Q

In a shocking turn of events, the Centre has informed the Supreme Court that the scorecards of a staggering 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates will be scrapped due to the erroneous allocation of grace marks. It seems that these students were unfairly awarded extra marks for a problematic question, sparking outrage and allegations of massive irregularities in the nationwide medical entrance exams. Responding to the growing concerns, a high-level committee was convened to delve into the matter. Over the course of three days, from June 10 to June 12, the committee meticulously examined the evidence and deliberated on the appropriate course of action. Their findings were clear: the scorecards of the affected candidates must be invalidated, and a re-examination must be conducted to ensure the integrity of the process. As a result of the committee's recommendations, the Centre has decided to provide the 1,563 students with a chance to redeem themselves. On June 23, these candidates will have the opportunity to participate in a re-test, with the results scheduled to be announced on June 30. This move aims to restore fairness and transparency to the NEET-UG 2024 process, which has been tainted by allegations of irregularities. The decision to invalidate the scorecards of the affected candidates and offer a re-test is a bold step towards restoring faith in the examination process. However, the true test lies in the authorities' ability to address the root causes, implement robust safeguards, and regain the trust of the medical aspirant community. Link - https://lnkd.in/dY9maaHJ By Karan Karayi #neet #aiims #mbbs #medical #biology #doctor #neetpreparation #medicalstudent #jee #neetug #neetexam #medico #medicine #chemistry #cbse #science #education #physics #futuredoctor #kota #kotacoaching #doctors #jeemains #neetmotivation #jipmer #iit #neetcoaching #neetaspirants #mbbsstudent #neetpg

2024scmr443.. Educational institutions.... Medical university.. Fake and forged mark sheet presented to the university for admission... Admission cancellation of... Internal policies...of universities / colleges . Non interference by courts ..In academic matters there should be strict discipline and Mal practices should be strictly punished ... Allegations of fraud and or fabricated documents are treated with the utmost seriousness by supreme court , and those found to be engaging in such a practice are dealt with accordingly .. Every university has the right to set out its disciplinary and other policies in accordance with law , and unless such policy offends the fundamental rights of the students or violates any law, interference by courts would result in disrupting the smooth functioning and governance of the said universities.... university sent the mark sheet of respondent to the relevant board and on each occasion the said marks sheet were termed as fake Moreover while furnishing his mark sheet the respondent tendered an affidavit that all the documents submitted by him were genuine and if any document were found to be false his admission was liable to be cancelled ... that is why the respondent was granted provisional admission in MBBS ..The university was quite justified in cancelling his admission ... Respondent was not entitled for admission in MBBS.

WHAT ARE A-LEVELS? A-Levels (Advanced Level qualifications) are a subject-based qualification for students aged 16 and above. They are usually studied over two years, leading to qualifications recognised for entrance to higher education institutes in the UK and many others worldwide. Most higher education institutes require a minimum of 3 subjects. Although they are a UK qualification, schools across the world offer A Levels. In addition, most universities and Higher Education institutes recognise A Levels as a suitable entry qualification. WHY ARE A-LEVELS IMPORTANT? A-level results are essential for prospective undergraduate students looking to gain entry into UK universities. These results offer admissions officers a reliable and uniform assessment of a student's academic skills and future potential. Whether your goal is to study at a renowned university or a specific program, your A-level grades play a significant role in the admissions process. It is crucial to recognize the significance of a well-rounded application in addition to A-levels. Numerous universities place value on extracurricular activities, personal statements, and letters of recommendation, alongside academic accomplishments. Achieving a balance between academic excellence and participation in clubs, sports, or volunteer work can enhance the appeal of your application - most especially for aspiring medical students. To summarize, A-levels play a vital role in university admissions. By comprehending their impact, making informed choices regarding subjects, and striving for high grades, you can enhance your chances of being accepted into your desired university. Remember, the journey towards higher education encompasses more than just grades; it presents an opportunity for personal development, exploration, and the pursuit of your passions. Embrace it with enthusiasm, and you will be well on your way to a successful academic future.

On Tuesday, India's top court issued a notice to the NTA, saying that even if there was "0.001% negligence on the part of anyone it should be thoroughly dealt with". But all this is small consolation for students who spend months or even years preparing for this highly competitive exam. Tens of millions of students in India dream of getting into a good medical or engineering college every year - the professions command a lot of respect and also hold out hope for a steady, long-term income in a country with a jobs crisis. This year, an astounding 2.4 million students competed for just 110,000 available seats in the NEET exam, underscoring the intense pressure and fierce competition faced by aspiring candidates. Of the total seats, 55,000-60,000 seats belong to government-run colleges, while private colleges offer the rest. Half of the seats are reserved for underprivileged students. Students flock to government colleges for their affordability. A five-year MBBS course in a government college costs between 500,000 and 1 million rupees ($5,992 - $11,984), whereas private colleges can charge up to ten times more. Since 2016 - when NEET became the official entrance exam for medical colleges in India - only one to three students have got full marks each year, and sometimes not even that. This year, there was also a significant increase in the number of candidates scoring in the high range of 650-680 marks, intensifying the competition for seats in India’s top medical colleges. The unusual results sparked concerns among parents and students, who alleged irregularities in the exam's conduct and grading and called for an investigation. But the NTA refuted these allegations, saying that the “integrity of the examination had not been compromised” and that there were more high scorers this year because more students had taken the exam. It also said that 1,563 candidates were given "grace marks" for delays at exam centres and because a physics question turned out to have two correct answers. Notably, 50 out of the 67 top scorers achieved perfect marks due to these compensatory points. But on 13 June, India’s top court cancelled the compensatory marks after several students filed petitions challenging the NTA’s decision, calling it “arbitrary” and “unfair”. The Supreme Court also asked for students who had received grace marks to be given the option to take the test again - this is set to be held on 23 June. But protesters say the court’s ruling doesn’t address the larger issues they raised, like allegations of paper leaks, cheating and systemic corruption. #neet #neetexam #neetexamscam #neetexam2024 #neetscam2024 #neetexamscam2024 #neetpaper #neetexamleaked #ntascam #governmentofindiascam

NYU is reconsidering its test-optional policy for next year’s admissions cycle after some universities across the country found that the approach could disadvantage lower-income students. The university is following in the footsteps of schools like Yale University, Brown University and Dartmouth University — all of which have recently announced a return to mandatory standardized testing policies — and is reviewing internal data to determine the best way forward. The university is also participating in a national study run by the Academic Research Consortium — a global partnership of individuals and organizations involved in making, testing and regulating medical devices — that will help determine the impact of submitting or not submitting test scores in the admissions process, according to NYU spokesperson John Beckman. “The issue of whether to remain test optional is under active study and review,” Beckman wrote in a statement to WSN. “At this juncture, we have not made a final decision for next year’s admission cycle (i.e., for the class that will enter in fall 2025) about how to proceed in terms of testing policy.” Many universities, including NYU, went test optional during the COVID-19 pandemic, when access to testing centers was difficult for many students due to closures. Test-optional policies are also seen by some universities to “[improve] access, broadly speaking, for low-income, underrepresented, and first-generation students,” although research on their effectiveness at increasing enrollment in these groups has yielded mixed results. But a review of internal data by Dartmouth found that some lower-income students who were not admitted would have been accepted if they had submitted their test scores, which they had incorrectly believed were too low to secure admission. In February, the school announced that it would begin to require standardized test scores for the class of 2029. A few weeks later, Yale announced it would return to mandatory standardized testing policies, also citing concerns that its test-optional policies had inadvertently disadvantaged low-income applicants. Brown followed suit earlier this month. Click the link to read the full story.

A remarkable decision, but       Recently, I talked about the decision of the UGC regarding admissions to Ph.D. programmes on the basis of their NET score.   Though I really praised this decision, I have two issues.   First, it doesn’t give any clarification for the students who already qualified for the for the NET.   Secondly, the rule says that the NET score of the students from Categories (II) and (III) will be valid for only one year.   That is, if they fail to enrol in the PhD programme within one year, they will have to take the exam again.   In my opinion, the time period of 1 year is less if we look into the fact that most people go for a PhD after their mid-20s.   A lot of students might be working and have responsibilities to fulfil, so leaving everything and going for a PhD might be a difficult decision.   And extending the time period will help them manage things in a better manner.   Also, some female candidates might be on maternity leave during that time period, or they might be getting married.   And in these cases, they are more likely to not enrol in a year.   And then there can be other situations too, including medical conditions.   I genuinely feel that the time limit of 1 year shall be extended to 2 or 3 years.   And it is justified because the GATE result is valid for 3 years.   What are your thoughts on this?   Share your views in the comment sections below.   And watch my latest YouTube video for details; link in the comments. #exams #UGC #guidelines #education #highereducation