Rajesh kannan’s Post

View profile for Rajesh kannan, graphic

🚀 SDET 3 @Comcast - SKY | Certified SAFe® 6 Practitioner | Test Automation Expert | GenAI Enthusiast

I agree. Some job descriptions really feel like they’re looking for a tester-turned-superhero—fluent in 5 languages, mastering every automation tool ever created, and somehow using Cypress, Selenium, and Playwright in the same day. Seriously, are they okay? 😂 The best SDETs I know focus on: ✅ Scalable, maintainable test systems. ✅ Smart tool choices (not chasing trends). ✅ Explaining complex concepts without a tech dictionary. Instead of endless buzzwords, let’s post roles that focus on real needs. And let’s be honest—today’s “must-have” tool is tomorrow’s legacy headache. What’s the funniest job requirement you’ve ever seen? Let’s hear it! 👇 #SDET #HiringFails #QA #Automation

View profile for Ravi Kiran, graphic

VP of Engineering @ CAW

Real Talk About SDET Hiring - From Someone Who's Been on Both Sides I had to smile this morning while reviewing some SDET job descriptions that landed in my inbox. They reminded me of my mother's shopping lists - you know, the ones where she writes down everything in the store just in case she needs it. Look, I get it. I've been heading automation teams for years now, and yes, we all want rockstar engineers. But here's what I'm seeing everywhere: "Required Skills:" - Must know every automation framework created since the dawn of testing - Should code fluently in roughly 4-5 programming languages - Must have mastered all CI/CD tools (including the ones still in beta) - Need expert-level knowledge in... well, everything Here's the thing - I've hired and worked with some brilliant SDETs over the years. Want to know what made them exceptional? It wasn't their encyclopedic knowledge of every tool in existence. The real MVPs in my teams have always been engineers who: - Really understand how to design robust test architecture - Have solid coding skills in one or two languages (and can learn others when needed) - Know how to pick the right tool for the job (not just the trending one) - Can explain complex testing concepts to non-technical folks - Actually think about maintainability (bless their souls) Let's be real for a minute. If you're posting job requirements that look like a copy-paste of the entire testing section of Stack Overflow, you might be doing it wrong. What if instead, we tried something radical - like being honest about what the job actually needs? Here's my approach: 1. List the core tech stack they'll use daily (the real one, not the aspirational one) 2. Focus on problem-solving abilities (because that weird edge case won't test itself) 3. Look for architectural thinking (because someone needs to think about the big picture) 4. Value learning aptitude (because today's hot framework is tomorrow's legacy code) After all, I've never met an engineer who simultaneously used Cypress, Playwright, Selenium, and Appium all in one day. And if you have, please check if they're okay. Fellow engineering leaders - what's your take on this? How do you cut through the noise when writing job descriptions? #SoftwareEngineering #TestAutomation #HiringInTech #EngineeringLeadership #RealTalk #SDET #QualityEngineering

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics