The Cost of Delay (CoD) is a crucial concept in Lean Product Development - it helps quantify the economic impact of delaying a project or task. It measures the negative economic impact of not completing something at the optimal time. Here's a breakdown of its significance: Understanding Cost of Delay 💡 💰 Economic Value: CoD represents the money lost by not delivering a product or feature on time. For example, if a feature could generate £100,000 per month, a three-month delay would result in a £300,000 loss. 💯 Prioritization: It helps prioritize tasks based on their economic value over time. Tasks with higher CoD should be completed sooner to maximize economic return. 🎯 Decision-Making: CoD provides a financial basis for decision-making, helping teams choose which work-items to tackle first. Benefits of Using Cost of Delay😍 🤼 Improved Resource Allocation: By understanding the economic impact of delays, teams can allocate resources more effectively to high-value tasks. 📈 Enhanced Productivity: Prioritizing tasks based on CoD ensures that the most valuable work is completed first, leading to better productivity and faster delivery. 💸 Better Financial Outcomes: By focusing on tasks with the highest economic value, organizations can improve their financial performance and return on investment. (On a side note : predicting future economic value (an aspect of detailed CoD calculation) can be challenging - yet, it is the basis of all business, and investment - and is likely a core use case for machine learning and predictive analytics.) Don Reinertsen, a pioneer in Lean Product Development, has shared several insightful nuggets of wisdom about the Cost of Delay (CoD). Here are a few key points: 👊 Quantify the Impact: Reinertsen emphasizes the importance of quantifying the economic impact of delays. He states, "Cost of Delay is the one thing to quantify". By understanding the financial consequences of delays, teams can make better decisions about prioritizing tasks. 🙀 Surprising Numbers: He often highlights that people are usually surprised by how large the CoD numbers are when they first calculate them. This realization helps teams appreciate the urgency of addressing delays. 🤝 Consensus Building: Reinertsen notes that calculating CoD can help build consensus among team members. When people see the actual numbers, they often reach a better understanding and agreement on priorities 💰 Economic Decision-Making: He advocates for using CoD to make economic decisions in product development. This includes evaluating the cost of queues, the value of excess capacity, the benefit of smaller batch sizes, and the value of variability. 🏛 Communication with Management: Reinertsen stresses the importance of communicating with senior managers in economic terms. By presenting CoD in financial terms, it becomes easier to get their support and alignment. Recommend reading: Principles of Product Development Flow,Donald G. Reinertsen
Richard Cowling’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Lean Product Development: Maximizing Value, Minimizing Waste In today’s fast-paced market, efficiency is key. Lean product development is a methodology that focuses on creating more value for customers with fewer resources. By eliminating waste and optimizing processes, lean development helps teams deliver better products faster. Let’s explore the core principles and benefits of lean product development! What is Lean Product Development? Lean product development is inspired by lean manufacturing principles. which emphasizes on; Customer Value: Delivering features that truly meet customer needs. Continuous Improvement: Regularly iterating and refining the product. Waste Elimination: Identifying and removing activities that do not add value. Core Principles of Lean Product Development 1. Customer-Centric Approach Understand the Customer: Use customer feedback and research to deeply understand their needs and pain points. Deliver Value Early and Often: Focus on features that provide the most value to customers as quickly as possible. Build, Measure, Learn Build: Develop a minimum viable product (MVP) to quickly bring a product to market. Measure: Collect data and feedback on how the product is being used and its impact. Learn: Use insights to iterate and improve the product continuously. 2. Cross-Functional Collaboration 🤝 Team Integration: Break down silos and encourage collaboration across development, design, marketing, and other teams. Empower Teams: Give teams the autonomy to make decisions and take ownership of their work. 3. Iterative Development 🔧 Short Development Cycles: Use short, iterative cycles to develop, test, and refine the product. Regular Feedback Loops: Continuously seek and incorporate feedback from customers and stakeholders. Focus on Flow Optimize Workflow: Streamline processes to ensure smooth and efficient product development. Limit Work in Progress: Avoid overloading teams by limiting the number of concurrent tasks. Benefits of Lean Product Development Faster Time to Market: By focusing on MVPs and iterative development, you can bring products to market faster and start gathering feedback sooner. Reduced Waste: Eliminating non-value-added activities ensures resources are used efficiently. Higher Customer Satisfaction: A customer-centric approach leads to products that better meet customer needs and expectations. Increased Flexibility: The iterative nature of lean development allows for quick adjustments based on feedback and market changes. Enhanced Team Collaboration: Cross-functional teams work more effectively together, fostering innovation and creativity. I'd love to hear your comments on this topic in the comments. Would you employ this methodology in developing your next product or feature? PS: image by mambo.io
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
As we explore deeper into Lean Product Management, it's crucial to address not only the strategies and tools but also the team dynamics that drive continuous improvement and innovation. This installment highlights how cultivating a culture of innovation is essential for teams to thrive in a competitive market landscape. Creating an innovative culture involves several key strategies: 1️⃣ Encourage Risk-Taking and Experimentation: Lean management principles support the idea of making small, calculated risks to test new ideas. Encouraging teams to experiment safely within set parameters fosters a culture where innovation is not just welcomed, but expected. This environment allows creativity to flourish, and even failed experiments are valued for the lessons they provide. 2️⃣ Diverse Teams for Diverse Ideas: Innovation thrives in diverse environments. By assembling teams with varied backgrounds, experiences, and skill sets, organizations can tap into a broader range of ideas and perspectives. This diversity not only enhances problem-solving capabilities but also drives more creative solutions that are responsive to diverse customer needs. 3️⃣ Regular Innovation Workshops and Hackathons: Scheduling regular events such as innovation workshops or hackathons encourages ongoing creativity and problem-solving. These events give team members a platform to express their ideas and collaborate on projects outside their regular workflows, which can lead to breakthrough innovations. 4️⃣ Recognition and Rewards for Innovative Ideas: To sustain an innovative culture, it’s important to recognize and reward creativity. Implementing a system that acknowledges both successful innovations and intelligent failures (those from which valuable insights are gained) motivates teams to keep pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. 5️⃣ Leadership Support for Innovation Initiatives: Leadership plays a critical role in fostering an innovative culture. Leaders should actively support and participate in innovation initiatives to set an example. Their involvement demonstrates a commitment to innovation and encourages similar engagement from team members. By embedding these practices into the core of Lean Product Management, teams can develop a strong culture of innovation that propels them forward and ensures they remain adaptive and successful in meeting market demands. Stay tuned for our next post where we will look into building sustainable development practices within Lean frameworks, ensuring long-term success and minimal environmental impact. ________________________________________________________________________________ 🚀 Explore More Lean Mastery Insights on my Profile: Amine Saied! 👉 Like, comment, share, and follow to stay updated and exchange ideas! 🌟 Let’s build better products together! #LeanManagement #CultureOfInnovation #ProductManagement #TeamDynamics #InnovationLeadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
13 Common Product Development Biases to Watch Out For 1. Early “Convergence” The tendency to quickly select and develop solutions without fully exploring alternatives. – Have we fully explored other options before making a decision? 2. Large Planning Inventory A buildup of planned tasks and ideas that go unimplemented leads to inefficiencies and delays. – Are we accumulating too many planned tasks without taking action? 3. “Flickering Objects” Engaging in new, exciting ideas or technologies at the expense of core product development goals. – Are we distracted by new ideas instead of focusing on our core goals? 4. Short-Term Impact Prioritizing immediate results over long-term value, which can result in the sacrifice of product quality or sustainability. – Are we sacrificing long-term value for immediate results? 5. "Large Batches" Working in large units of work, resulting in longer lead times and reduced flexibility. - Do we break work into stages and batches to maintain flexibility and responsiveness? 6. Predictability and Certainty Focusing on ensuring a predictable development process, often at the expense of innovation. - Do we prioritize predictability or innovation? 7. Late Integration Delaying the integration of different components or features, which can lead to unexpected problems and increased complexity. - Do we wait too long to integrate components, risking complexity and problems? 8. Delayed Feedback Delaying the collection and use of user feedback, which can lead to an unsatisfactory or undesirable product. - Do we delay user feedback, risking an unsatisfactory product? 9. "Parallelism" Running multiple tasks or processes at the same time to speed up development, but this can cause conflicts or dependencies. - Are we running too many tasks at the same time, causing potential conflicts? 10. Starting in Silos Initiating work in small groups without the involvement of the entire team or stakeholders, resulting in poor strategy and less collaboration. - Are we excluding stakeholders early in development? 11. "Fire and Forget" Releasing a product without ongoing support, maintenance, or updates, leading to user dissatisfaction and potential obsolescence. - Are we missing opportunities to improve the product in response to our customers' requests? 12. Individual Assignment of Tasks Assigning tasks to individual team members, which can limit collaboration and knowledge sharing. - Are we limiting collaboration by assigning tasks to individual team members? 13. Prioritizing Volume Over Results Focusing on the quantity of the product rather than the overall value or success of the product. - Are we focusing more on the quantity of work than the success of the product? #productdevelopment #productmanagement #teamcollaboration #userfeedback #productquality #projectmanagement #agile #sprintplanning #biases #efficiency #longtermvalue #productowner #productmanager #productstrategy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Why you should stop using product roadmaps and try the GIST Framework? I’ve long admired Itamar Gilad's insightful perspectives on Product Management, and his work never fails to inspire. In the ever-evolving world of AI and Data Science, success hinges on one critical factor: clearly defining the goal or problem and empowering teams to tackle it with creativity, cost-effectiveness, and a relentless focus on quality and customer satisfaction. Frameworks like GIST and OKRs embody this mindset, offering organizations a proven blueprint to lead in crafting and executing winning AI strategies. This approach isn’t just smart—it’s transformative. Executive Summary Traditional product roadmaps are outdated, rigid, and stifle innovation. Enter the GIST Framework—a flexible, evidence-based planning system designed for modern product development. GIST (Goals, Ideas, Step-projects, and Tasks) offers a lightweight, iterative approach that encourages experimentation, reduces wasted effort, and fosters innovation. Built on principles from Lean Startup and Agile Development, GIST empowers teams to remain adaptive while aligning with long-term objectives. Three Key Takeaways 1. Goals Over Roadmaps - Replace static, top-down roadmaps with dynamic Goals that focus on desired outcomes rather than pre-defined solutions. - Inspired by OKRs, this empowers teams to innovate with autonomy, driving alignment without micromanagement. 2. Experimentation with Step-Projects - Break big ideas into short, 10-week step-projects, allowing for rapid testing and learning. - This iterative approach reduces risk, prioritizes successful ideas, and avoids prolonged investment in unproven concepts. 3. Continuous Innovation Through Idea Banks - Idea Banks collect and prioritize a wide range of concepts, fostering creativity without the pressure of immediate execution. - Evidence-based prioritization ensures resources are allocated to ideas with the highest potential impact. Key Insight: GIST is more than a framework; it’s a mindset shift that aligns product development with agility, innovation, and real-world outcomes. Say goodbye to rigid roadmaps and hello to a living plan that adapts to change while delivering better products faster. Author - Itamar Gilad Article Link: 👉 https://lnkd.in/gUjHXgUu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I had a great conversation with Phil Hornby about product processes. We have to expand our horizons beyond Discovery and Delivery and incorporate Exploration. Dual-track agile and continuous discovery address many issues in the product development process. However, they tend to be very tactical, missing the bigger picture: emerging technologies, shifting user behaviors, and evolving market dynamics. This short-term focus can lead to tactical success but strategic vulnerability. An annual strategy exercise is supposed to fix this gap. However, in a rapidly changing tech environment, annual strategy shifts disrupt product discovery and delivery, leading to significant delays. The solution? Adding continuous exploration to your product process. While discovery helps you understand current user needs and delivery brings solutions to life, exploration ensures you're building for where the world is heading. Exploration (2-4 years out) Continuous exploration scans for signals, maps patterns, and builds future scenarios. Teams track technology trends, emerging user behaviors, and competitive moves. Through regular scenario planning and pattern mapping, they maintain an evolving view of possible futures. This continuous process feeds both discovery and delivery with future context. Discovery (3-12 months out) With future context from exploration, discovery teams validate current problems and solutions against longer-term trends. They combine immediate user needs with emerging patterns to ensure solutions remain relevant beyond the current cycle. User research, prototyping, and business validation all benefit from this broader perspective. Delivery (1-3 months out) Delivery teams implement solutions with awareness of future technical needs and market shifts. This forward-looking context helps avoid technical debt and ensures features align with longer-term strategic direction. Continuous exploration has many advantages: - Reduced strategic surprises through early pattern detection - Better-informed technical decisions that account for future needs - More innovative solutions that leverage emerging opportunities - Stronger alignment between immediate actions and long-term strategy - Improved resource allocation across time horizons By making exploration continuous and connecting it directly to discovery and delivery, you can maintain a strategic perspective while delivering immediate value. The key is lightweight integration: daily signal scanning, weekly pattern mapping, and monthly scenario updates feed directly into discovery and delivery processes. This creates a learning loop where execution informs strategy, and strategy guides execution continuously. @productstrategy @productmanagement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
BOOK review: "Lean Product and Process Development (LPPD)" by Allen C. Ward Introduction: The book is a key resource for applying lean principles to product development. In this second edition, edited by Durward Sobek, Ward’s vision is refined to provide actionable strategies for integrating lean into innovation and design, with a focus on reducing lead times, improving quality, and lowering development costs. Plot Overview: The book explores the idea that product development should not just focus on delivering a product but on creating operational value streams that are profitable. It goes beyond traditional approaches by introducing lean principles that streamline development and eliminate waste. Ward challenges conventional product development methods, offering insights into how companies like Toyota succeed by embedding learning and efficiency into their processes. Main Themes: 1. Creating Usable Knowledge: Ward’s core thesis is that the development process is about creating knowledge, which leads to more informed, efficient decisions. 2. Set-Based Concurrent Engineering: This technique involves exploring multiple design options simultaneously rather than sequentially, allowing for more flexibility and faster iteration. 3. Knowledge Waste: The book emphasizes the identification and elimination of waste in the development process, particularly in how knowledge is used and shared. 4. Collaboration and Learning: LPPD emphasizes a learning-based, collaborative environment where teams work together to streamline processes and innovate. Key Learning Concepts Illustrated: - The Four Cornerstones of Lean Development: These are principles gleaned from Toyota's practices and focus on continuous improvement, knowledge-based decision-making, and customer value. - Use of Trade-off Curves: The book explores how tools like trade-off curves enable teams to make informed design decisions, citing examples like the P-51 Mustang's development. - Case Studies: The second edition includes five real-world case studies to showcase how lean product development principles have been successfully applied across industries. Conclusion: LPPD is a comprehensive guide for companies looking to revolutionize their product development processes. Ward’s vision of product development emphasizes efficiency, flexibility, and learning, providing companies with the tools they need to innovate faster and smarter. By adopting these principles, organizations can eliminate waste, improve quality, and bring better products to market more quickly. Biography: Allen Ward was a pioneer in lean product development and a thought leader whose work significantly impacted industries around the world. His background in engineering and his study of successful companies like Toyota provided the foundation for his groundbreaking insights into product development. His teachings continue to inspire professionals in engineering, product management, and process improvement.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Lean is not the right methodology for product development. Toyota used lean manufacturing to dominate the automobile industry for decades before other manufacturers caught up. And because waterfall is a form of assembly line, people thought that lean could be applied to product development - but it doesn't work. Every process has a design phase and a delivery phase. In manufacturing the design happens before the assembly line is created. Because waterfall was modelled on assembly lines you start with an idea (the design) as well, but what we've learned through repeated failure is that we got the boundary wrong between design and delivery in software. Design is all about trying things and iterating to find out what works but because we lock in scope too early we never get a chance to iterate and improve on our original ideas. The problem is that we see writing software as a mechanical activity when in reality software development is design. Writing code is as creative as any other design discipline. Lean is fantastic for optimising delivery processes but it is the wrong process for optimising design activities. You need waste, you need space to follow dead-ends and you need multiple iterations to design better products. We need processes that correctly identify the boundary between design and delivery so that we can make each more efficient and effective. But there are no frameworks on the market today that bring it all together. That's why we created one! https://lnkd.in/dDXVaMxc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Maximizing Impact: Strategies for Aligning Product Development with Business Goals Here’s a structured approach Aligning product development with business goals 1. Understand Business Goals Identify Key Objectives: Start by gaining a clear understanding of the company's strategic goals. These could be related to revenue growth, market expansion, customer satisfaction, innovation, or cost reduction. Communicate Across Departments: Ensure that everyone involved in product development understands these goals and update the team on any changes to the business strategy. 2. Define Product Vision and Strategy Align Product Vision: Create a product vision that supports the broader business objectives. Develop a Product Roadmap: Outline how the product will evolve over time, including key milestones and timelines. Ensure that the roadmap reflects the business goals and includes metrics for success. 3. Engage Stakeholders Collaborate with Key Stakeholders: Involve stakeholders from different departments (e.g., marketing, sales, finance) in the product development process to ensure their needs and insights are incorporated. Set Clear Expectations: Define roles, responsibilities, and expectations for each stakeholder to ensure alignment and accountability. 4. Prioritize Features and Functionality Link Features to Business Goals: Prioritize product features based on how well they contribute to the business objectives. For example, if customer retention is a goal, prioritize features that enhance user experience. Use Data-Driven Decision Making: Leverage market research, customer feedback, and analytics to make informed decisions about which features to develop and when to release them. 5. Implement Agile Practices Adopt Agile Methodologies: Agile practices, such as Scrum or Kanban, can help ensure that product development remains flexible and responsive to changes in business goals or market conditions. Regularly Review and Adjust: Hold regular review meetings (sprints, retrospectives) to assess progress and make adjustments as needed to stay aligned with business goals. 6. Measure Success Define Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Establish KPIs that measure the product’s impact on business goals. These might include metrics like revenue generated, customer acquisition costs, or user engagement rates. Analyze Performance: Regularly analyze performance data to assess whether the product is meeting its objectives and contributing to the business goals. Use this analysis to inform future product development efforts. 7. Iterate and Improve Collect Feedback: Gather feedback from customers, stakeholders, and team members to identify areas for improvement. Adapt and Refine: Use the feedback and performance data to make iterative improvements to the product and development process, ensuring continued alignment with business goals. By following these steps, you can ensure that your product development efforts are closely aligned with your business objectives.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Continuous iterating on product features based on user feedback is called the "Build-Measure-Learn" loop, this is a core principle of the Lean Startup approach. How it works: 1. *Build*: Develop a minimum viable product (MVP) or a new feature. 2. *Measure*: Collect user feedback and data on how the product or feature is used. 3. *Learn*: Analyze the feedback and data to identify insights and areas for improvement. 4. *Repeat*: Iterate on the product or feature based on what you've learned, and continue the cycle. This approach allows for refining of product continuously, ensuring it meets user needs and improves customer satisfaction leading to customer retention. There are other methods that involve iterating on product features based on user feedback, they are: - Agile Development - User-Centered Design (UCD) - Design Thinking - Continuous Improvement - Iterative Development These methods all emphasize the importance of user feedback and continuous iteration to develop a successful product.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Lean Product Playbook: Chapter-Wise Key Takeaways 📚 The Book is a valuable guide for anyone involved in product development. It emphasizes the importance of iterative development, customer feedback, and minimizing waste. Here are some key takeaways from each chapter: We’re seeking your feedback on the challenges you encounter while learning and building practical knowledge in product management. Share your feedback and get this book FREE, Next weekend, The feedback link https://lnkd.in/gTNjbb9K Chapter 1: The Lean Startup Approach 🚀 Product-market fit: This is the most crucial goal for any product. It means building a product that customers want and are willing to pay for. Iterative development: Continuously improving a product based on feedback and learning. 🔄 Minimum Viable Product (MVP): A version of a product with just enough features to attract early adopters and validate assumptions. 🧪 Chapter 2: The Lean Product Process ⚙️ Six-step process: This process outlines the steps to achieve product-market fit: Identify target customers 🎯 Select underserved needs 🔍 Define product value proposition 💡 Shortlist MVP feature set 📋 Build a prototype 🚧 Test with customers 👥 Customer interviews: Essential for understanding customer needs and pain points. 🗣️ Chapter 3: Defining Your Value Proposition 🎯 Clear value proposition: A concise statement that communicates the unique benefits of your product. 📣 Customer pain points: Understanding what problems your product solves for customers. 🤕 Competitive analysis: Identifying competitors and their strengths and weaknesses. ⚔️ Chapter 4: Building Your Minimum Viable Product 🛠️ Focus on core features: Prioritize the most essential features for your MVP. 💪 Iterative design: Continuously refining the design based on feedback. ♻️ Rapid prototyping: Creating low-fidelity prototypes to test ideas quickly. ⚡️ Chapter 5: Testing Your Minimum Viable Product 🧪 Customer testing: Gathering feedback from real customers to validate assumptions. 💬 Metrics: Tracking key metrics to measure product performance. 📊 Learning from failures: Using failures as opportunities for growth and improvement. 💡 Chapter 6: Iterating and Improving 🔄 Continuous improvement: Making incremental changes to the product based on data. 📈 Agile development: A flexible approach to software development that emphasizes iterative planning, development, and testing. Agile 🏃♂️ Product-market fit validation: Continuously assessing whether the product meets customer needs. ✅ Overall, The Lean Product Playbook provides a practical framework for building successful products. By following the principles outlined in the book, you can reduce risk, accelerate development, and increase the chances of creating a product that customers love. #LeanStartup #ProductDevelopment #MVP #CustomerFeedback
To view or add a comment, sign in