Hey, future MDs! Here’s a Social Science practice question to test your knowledge! 😉 Comment your answers below and stay tuned later to know the correct answers! 💙 For more practice questions like this, sign up at https://lnkd.in/gg4aY9_3 today! 🩺
RiseMD Reviews’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
📣🎥In case you missed it, I had the pleasure of participating in a two-part video interview as part of the event "Quantitative Methods for Social Sciences,", which is titled “Rasch measurement for questionnaire construction part 1 – An interview with Vahid Aryadoust”, funded through a Collaborative Innovative Grant by Methods North West and hosted by Raffaella Bottini and Santi Lestari of Lancaster University. I discussed the fascinating world of Rasch measurement for questionnaire construction. I also discussed the differences between item response theory and Rasch measurement! 📊 👉 Link to the video: https://lnkd.in/gPvuFKie
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Researchers at MRRI walk you through the methods and considerations for using lesion-symptom mapping in your research in this video series: https://lnkd.in/evJdUdXv
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Please check out this great special section opportunity to publish in Psychometrika ARCS!
I am pleased to announce a new Call of Papers for the Special Section of Applications and Case Studies (ARCS) of the journal Psychometrika. The topic of the special section is "Integrating and Analyzing Complex High-Dimensional Data in Social and Behavioral Sciences Research ". The Guest Editors of this special section are Dr. Katrijn Van Deun from Tilburg University and Dr. Eric F. Lock from University of Minnesota. More details about the special section are attached.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Want to improve your scientific figure making? 📊 📈 Sign up to join this webinar on October 1 at noon, tailored for researchers and scientists, to discover how BioRender can strengthen the quality of your scientific figures! https://lnkd.in/excvQt4h
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📄 In a new study by Doctoral Scholar Abdulrahman Faden, Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Aty, et al., the researchers contribute to the literature by using data from three states (Florida, Virginia, and Wisconsin) and a multivariate Poisson-lognormal (MVPLN) method via an integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) approach to investigate the dependency and the correlation between crash frequencies in two locations (on-ramp- and merge-related). 🔗 Learn more: https://lnkd.in/eCvFfqzj
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌟 New Course! 🌟 What does it mean to be human? Dive into this profound question and explore its impact on our self-understanding and interactions. Join us and learn from both science and faith perspectives. 👉🏽 https://lnkd.in/dX7FFqPi
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
New Principal Investigators: you're not alone! Our latest blog explores the unexpected challenges and feelings of isolation faced by new PIs, drawing from a 2018 Science article from Elisabeth Pain (https://lnkd.in/e2B7t2CY). Learn how to navigate the transition from collaborative researcher to lab leader and find out how Lumos Scientific can support you in managing these complexities. https://lnkd.in/exKsikPJ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In this clear and companionable guide, complex systems scientist Melanie Mitchell provides an intimate tour of the sciences of complexity, a broad set of efforts that seek to explain how large-scale complex, organized, and adaptive behavior can emerge from simple interactions among myriad individuals. https://t.ly/j1eA5
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
New issue of the Recovery Reader newsletter is out now. This month's feature is all about Harmonizing Science and Service: The Synergy of Evidence-Based Practice and Practice-Based Evidence in Recovery. Read all about it here: https://lnkd.in/gxevzeSY
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Dear Professor Holden Thorp , I am sorry to trouble you, but is "trust in scientists" (https://lnkd.in/gEHNR9tj) same or equivalent to (your rephrasing it as) "trust in science" (https://lnkd.in/gM2NUM8h)? The last time I checked science is NOT (what labeled/professional/livelihood) scientists (do)! Having troubled you I'm feeling guilty and here's a consolation: Don't You Trust Me? (https://lnkd.in/g5wSSJtX, I'm guessing Madam Oates belongs to your choir ;) Oftentimes, when faced with a crisis, we look back and when we do so we do find the financial crisis, a result of untrustworthy bankers, which led to the development of a trustless blockchain technology. Beginning with #Fauci we had quite a few untrustworthy scientists, which sooner or later will lead to the development of, for lack of a better name that I could readily think of, trustless truthbody technology. In closing, making it seem like Trump invented lies might have had a chance of being bought in the first yuga of truth, where people had no concept of lie, but in this kali yuga, scientists like that Harvard Mehra and journals like Nature Magazine belong in the basket of deplorables (liars). #trust #science #scientist #PawanKalyan #truth #concept #satya #yuga #kali #Harvard #trustless #blockchain #technology #truthbody #Mehra #Fauci #covid #corona #wuhan #banksters #financial #crisis
As many Americans question trustworthiness of institutions, how can we pivot to help strengthen the public’s trust in science? Join AAAS and Science Magazine, alongside Pew Research Center, on November 14 at 3:15 p.m. ET as we dive into one of the most pressing issues affecting the scientific enterprise: The state of America's trust in science. The virtual event will feature the release of Pew's 2024 trust in science survey data, followed by a panel discussion with Sudip Parikh, Holden Thorp, and AAAS Board member Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Register now: https://bit.ly/4e2KzA6
To view or add a comment, sign in
8 followers