📜 ON REFORMS TO The Political Constitution of the Mexican United States 📜 ICYMI.... CNN Mexico " Mexican Senate approves the questioned expansion of crimes that allow preventive detention" By Verónica Calderón November 28, 2024 Higlights: 😱 The Mexican Senate has passed a constitutional reform expanding the range of crimes eligible for preventive detention. This controversial measure allows authorities to hold individuals without formal charges based on preliminary investigations suggesting probable responsibility. The reform modifies Article 19 of the Constitution and adds crimes such as extortion, fentanyl trafficking, and tax receipt falsification to the list of offenses warranting preventive detention. 😱 Previously, preventive detention applied to severe crimes like organized crime, intentional homicide, rape, and kidnapping. The new amendment broadens this scope, aiming to address impunity. 😱 Under Mexican law, suspects can be detained for up to 72 hours (or 144 hours for organized crime) before presenting evidence to a judge. Without sentencing, detainees cannot be held for more than two years, according to the Supreme Court. 😱 Inegi reports that 37.3% of Mexico’s 233,777 prisoners are held without a sentence. Only 1% of crimes reported in 2021 were resolved, reflecting widespread impunity. 😱 Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights criticize the reform, arguing it violates human rights and increases the incarceration of vulnerable populations without reducing crime. 😱 HRW and other organizations assert that preventive detention exacerbates inequalities, disproportionately impacting the poor, and fails to reduce violence or impunity. Homicide rates remain high, with 28 per 100,000 inhabitants recorded in 2023. 😱 The UN’s Volker Türk condemned the reform, stating preventive detention should be an individualized judicial decision rather than a blanket measure. 😱 Claudia Sheinbaum, a key ally of President López Obrador and his party’s likely successor, defended the reform as ensuring that evidence determines detention decisions, not judicial discretion. https://lnkd.in/g3fJkPBi
Roberto Sosa’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
India's Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: Reform or Rhetoric? On July 1, 2024, India introduced the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and other new laws, marking a significant shift in its judicial framework. These reforms, intended to modernize and simplify legal processes, have sparked debate over their efficacy and impact. The BNS replaces the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860, aiming to make the law more accessible with simplified language. While this is seen as a positive step, critics worry it could lead to misinterpretations and unjust outcomes. Incorporating offenses like cybercrimes is crucial, but the judiciary’s existing backlog of over 4.4 crore cases raises concerns. Critics argue that without addressing systemic inefficiencies, these additions could worsen delays, suggesting the move may be more about appearances than genuine reform. The BNS emphasizes victim rights, yet enforcement remains a challenge. With low conviction rates for serious crimes, these measures risk being symbolic without substantial changes in law enforcement. Harsher penalties for severe crimes aim to deter criminal activity. However, research indicates that the certainty of punishment is more effective than severity. Given the system’s low conviction rates and lengthy trials, this approach might not significantly impact crime rates. Replacing the Indian Evidence Act of 1872 with the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam recognizes digital evidence but faces challenges due to inadequate infrastructure. Witness protection is a positive step, but the lack of a comprehensive program raises doubts about its effectiveness. Encouraging community policing and promoting technology in judicial processes are vital reforms. However, systemic issues in police administration and the digital divide in India pose significant challenges to their implementation. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita removes sedition, while adding the new provisions for penalizing secessionism, and introducing community service as a punishment. The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has provisions for time-bound investigations, mandatory video recording of sexual assault victims' statements, and new procedures for the attachment of property. The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill expanded admissible evidence to include digital records and mandating the digitization of all documents. While the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and new laws aim to modernize the judicial system, they face substantial criticism. Success hinges on addressing deep-seated systemic issues. Without comprehensive reforms, these changes risk being seen as political grandstanding rather than genuine improvements in justice delivery. #LegalReform #Judiciary #India #BharatiyaNyayaSanhita #LawReform #Justice
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
July 1st marks a historic milestone for India's justice system as it bids farewell to colonial-era laws and welcomes modern reforms aimed at safeguarding women and children. The introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) signals a transformative shift towards a more victim-centric approach. Key Changes Affecting Crimes Against Women: 1. Zero FIR: This allows victims to file a First Information Report (FIR) at any police station, regardless of jurisdiction. This eliminates delays and ensures immediate action, especially crucial in time-sensitive cases. 2. Mandatory videography: Crime scenes for heinous offenses must now be video recorded. This preserves crucial evidence and can help in more accurate investigations and prosecutions. 3. Digital modernization: Complaints can now be filed online, and summons can be sent via SMS. This makes the process more accessible and efficient for victims. 4. Enhanced sensitivity in rape cases: Female police officers will record statements from rape victims. A guardian or relative must be present during statement recording. Medical reports must be completed within 7 days, speeding up the process. 5. New legal framework: A dedicated chapter on crimes against women and children has been introduced, addressing specific issues more comprehensively. 6. Stricter punishments: Gang rape of minors now carries a potential death penalty or life imprisonment, showing a tougher stance on such heinous crimes. 7. Addressing relationship-based crimes: The laws now specifically cover false promises of marriage and abandonment after sexual relations, providing legal recourse in such situations. 8. Keeping victims informed: Regular case updates must be provided to victims within 90 days, ensuring they stay informed about the progress of their cases. 9. Immediate medical care: All hospitals are required to provide free first-aid and medical treatment to victims of crimes against women and children, ensuring prompt care in critical situations. 10. Faster justice: New timelines have been introduced, including: Charges must be framed within 60 days of the first hearing. Judgments in criminal cases must be delivered within 45 days of the trial's completion. These reforms are designed to make the criminal justice system more accessible, transparent, and responsive to the needs of victims, aligning with constitutional ideals. The new laws represent a significant step towards ensuring justice and safety for all, reflecting India's commitment to a modern, equitable legal framework. #NewCriminalLaws #WomenSafety #JusticeReform #ZeroFIR #SwiftJustice #VictimSupport #HarshPenalties
Curtain falls on British-era rules, new criminal laws come into effect from July 1. Details here
businesstoday.in
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Scottish government's independence paper explores justice system post-independence The Scottish Government’s latest independence paper focuses on justice, setting out how the legal system would work post-independence. The 13th paper in the Building a New Scotland says Scotland could take its own decisions on issues such as gambling and drug prohibition if it was to leave the UK. The paper says Scotland’s independent judiciary and the role of the Lord Advocate would continue after independence. The Court of Session (for civil matters) and the High Court of Justiciary (for criminal matters) would continue as the most senior courts in Scotland and collectively would become the Supreme Court of Scotland. Justice Secretary Angela Constance said: “There is more we could do with independence”. She said: “Scotland’s police and prosecutors would regain access to tools to pursue criminals across borders which were lost following Brexit, such as the Schengen Information System and the European Arrest Warrant.” She added: “With the power to take our own decisions, we could also enhance and further embed our public health approach to justice issues, extending this to addiction such as drugs and gambling.” She said independence could lead to “a more effective approach to improving justice outcomes, reducing burdens on the justice system and further reducing the number of victims of crime”. Stay ahead of the latest news and trends impacting the Scottish legal industry ➡️ https://lnkd.in/ey_umsfK #scotslaw #law #legal #justicesystem
Plans for justice in an independent Scotland laid out in latest white paper
thenational.scot
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The pretrial process signifies an individual's introduction into the legal system. Nationwide, the population of individuals detained pretrial has experienced a significant and rapid increase. Subsequently, initiatives aimed at addressing pretrial practices have followed suit. The Minnesota Justice Research Center has issued an initial report offering a comprehensive overview of the existing pretrial release and detention regulations. It concisely outlines the principles governing pretrial release while addressing the inequitable outcomes resulting from these practices, which extend their adverse effects across society. https://lnkd.in/g87ZhNKh #report #reform #justicesystem
Pretrial Best Practices Preliminary Report: The Need For Better and More Data
mnjrc.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Changes in India's Criminal Justice System! Starting today, three new criminal laws— Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) —are officially in force, replacing the British-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act. This marks a significant overhaul aimed at modernizing our legal framework and prioritizing justice, dignity, and data-driven policing. Key Highlights: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): Reduces sections from 511 to 358, introduces 21 new crimes, extends imprisonment for 41 crimes, and includes community service as a penalty. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS): Updates 177 sections, adds 9 new sections, and emphasizes online crime reporting and zero-FIR. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA): Modernizes evidence handling with 170 sections. These laws were crafted after extensive consultations with diverse stakeholders, including Supreme Court and High Court judges, governors, chief ministers, civil servants, police officers, and legislators. With around 3,200 suggestions reviewed, this comprehensive effort ensures our criminal justice system is equipped to handle contemporary challenges effectively. Prime Minister Modi emphasized that the spirit of these new laws is "citizen first, dignity first, and justice first," replacing the colonial "danda" with data as a policing tool. Home Minister Amit Shah highlighted that the focus is on justice delivery, safeguarding the rights of victims and the accused, and removing colonial-era biases. Notable Changes: Community Service as Punishment: Introduced for the first time, reflecting a shift towards rehabilitation. Enhanced Penalties for Sexual Offenses: Tougher penalties for deceitful sexual intercourse. Organized Crime: Broader definitions and severe penalties for crimes like kidnapping, robbery, and extortion. National Security and Terrorism: Clearly defined acts threatening India's integrity, sovereignty, and economic security. Mob Lynching: Specific criminalization with severe penalties. Sedition Replaced with Treason: A step towards decolonizing our legal system. The BNS, BNSS, and BSA laws represent a monumental shift, ensuring timely investigation and trial processes, especially for crimes against women and children, and prioritizing the rights and dignity of individuals. Stay informed and engaged as we continue to explore the impact of these transformative changes. #CriminalJusticeReform #NewLaws #ModernIndia #LegalUpdate #JusticeForAll #Bharatiya
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Victoria walks back on plan to raise the age of criminal responsibility to 14 by Allanah Sciberras (9News.com.au) The Victorian government has walked back on its commitment to increase the age of criminal responsibility to 14 by 2027 as part of ongoing youth justice reforms. Premier Jacinta Allan said the government would take decisive action against youth offenders, including strengthening the bail test for young people who commit serious crimes. She confirmed the government would move to raise the age of criminal responsibility to 12 but would not go any further. It will bring Victoria in line with the Northern Territory and the ACT, which have both committed to raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility above 10 years. The government vowed to lift that age in 2023, from 10 to 12, and again from 12-14 after mounting pressure from medical authorities, legal experts and Indigenous organisations. "The legislation before the government will raise the age of criminal responsibility to 12, and that is where it will stay," Allan said. "This decision has been made at a different time by a different government and by a different premier. "The decision has been made to keep the criminal responsibility to 12, to maintain a focus on the child. That is what the youth justice bill is about." Under the proposed amendments to the Youth Justice Bill 2024, bail decision-makers will need to assess both the risk to community safety and the risk of further serious offending when deciding if bail is appropriate. his would relate to youth offenders who have committed a serious offence such as aggravated burglary or robbery, dangerous driving, carjacking or home invasion. Continue reading Repeat offenders would also face tougher fights for freedom, with the government creating a new offence for committing a serious crime, including burglary, carjacking, murder and rape – while on bail. There will also be a trial of electronic monitoring and more intensive bail supervision, along with intensive bail supervision and stronger powers to transfer young people over 18 to adult prison. "These reforms deliver action on both ends of the spectrum, it's helping kids get back on track, ensuring repeat offenders face serious consequences and I look forward to working with parliament to make these changes," Allan said.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
MISDEMEANOR VS. FELONY CHARGES (Immigrants may face extremely harsh consequences in the criminal justice system and should never plead guilty to a misdemeanor or felony without first consulting with an immigration attorney.) The key differences between misdemeanors and felonies lie in their severity, punishment, and long-term effects. Misdemeanors are less serious crimes that usually result in jail time of less than one year and smaller fines. In contrast, felonies are typically more serious offenses that often lead to prison sentences of more than one year and larger fines. Felony convictions can have lasting impacts on your life, including the loss of certain civil rights such as voting and owning firearms. Additionally, felonies can severely affect your employment opportunities and housing options. The severity of the crime and repeat offenses can influence the length of imprisonment and fines for both misdemeanors and felonies. If you are facing criminal charges, whether a misdemeanor or a felony, it's important to get help from a lawyer to protect your rights and work towards the best outcome. We are here to guide you through this process and provide the support you need. For more information contact us here: https://lnkd.in/gYNaGfqn Check out our Newsletter here: https://lnkd.in/gBp3Baw2 #lawcoach #Immigation #immigrationlaw #asylum #criminallaw #immigrationattorney #criminalattorney
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Changes in India's Criminal Justice System! Starting today, three new criminal laws—Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)—are officially in force, replacing the British-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act. This marks a significant overhaul aimed at modernizing our legal framework and prioritizing justice, dignity, and data-driven policing. Key Highlights: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): Reduces sections from 511 to 358, introduces 21 new crimes, extends imprisonment for 41 crimes, and includes community service as a penalty. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS): Updates 177 sections, adds 9 new sections, and emphasizes online crime reporting and zero-FIR. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA): Modernizes evidence handling with 170 sections. These laws were crafted after extensive consultations with diverse stakeholders, including Supreme Court and High Court judges, governors, chief ministers, civil servants, police officers, and legislators. With around 3,200 suggestions reviewed, this comprehensive effort ensures our criminal justice system is equipped to handle contemporary challenges effectively. Prime Minister Modi emphasized that the spirit of these new laws is "citizen first, dignity first, and justice first," replacing the colonial "danda" with data as a policing tool. Home Minister Amit Shah highlighted that the focus is on justice delivery, safeguarding the rights of victims and the accused, and removing colonial-era biases. Notable Changes: Community Service as Punishment: Introduced for the first time, reflecting a shift towards rehabilitation. Enhanced Penalties for Sexual Offenses: Tougher penalties for deceitful sexual intercourse. Organized Crime: Broader definitions and severe penalties for crimes like kidnapping, robbery, and extortion. National Security and Terrorism: Clearly defined acts threatening India's integrity, sovereignty, and economic security. Mob Lynching: Specific criminalization with severe penalties. Sedition Replaced with Treason: A step towards decolonizing our legal system. The BNS, BNSS, and BSA laws represent a monumental shift, ensuring timely investigation and trial processes, especially for crimes against women and children, and prioritizing the rights and dignity of individuals. https://lnkd.in/gcspTVax Stay informed and engaged as we continue to explore the impact of these transformative changes. #CriminalJusticeReform #NewLaws #ModernIndia #LegalUpdate #JusticeForAll
IPR Attorney | Patent & Trademark Registration Expert | Managing Director at Eeva IP & IT Services | Safeguarding Innovation & Empowering Businesses
Changes in India's Criminal Justice System! Starting today, three new criminal laws— Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) —are officially in force, replacing the British-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act. This marks a significant overhaul aimed at modernizing our legal framework and prioritizing justice, dignity, and data-driven policing. Key Highlights: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS): Reduces sections from 511 to 358, introduces 21 new crimes, extends imprisonment for 41 crimes, and includes community service as a penalty. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS): Updates 177 sections, adds 9 new sections, and emphasizes online crime reporting and zero-FIR. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA): Modernizes evidence handling with 170 sections. These laws were crafted after extensive consultations with diverse stakeholders, including Supreme Court and High Court judges, governors, chief ministers, civil servants, police officers, and legislators. With around 3,200 suggestions reviewed, this comprehensive effort ensures our criminal justice system is equipped to handle contemporary challenges effectively. Prime Minister Modi emphasized that the spirit of these new laws is "citizen first, dignity first, and justice first," replacing the colonial "danda" with data as a policing tool. Home Minister Amit Shah highlighted that the focus is on justice delivery, safeguarding the rights of victims and the accused, and removing colonial-era biases. Notable Changes: Community Service as Punishment: Introduced for the first time, reflecting a shift towards rehabilitation. Enhanced Penalties for Sexual Offenses: Tougher penalties for deceitful sexual intercourse. Organized Crime: Broader definitions and severe penalties for crimes like kidnapping, robbery, and extortion. National Security and Terrorism: Clearly defined acts threatening India's integrity, sovereignty, and economic security. Mob Lynching: Specific criminalization with severe penalties. Sedition Replaced with Treason: A step towards decolonizing our legal system. The BNS, BNSS, and BSA laws represent a monumental shift, ensuring timely investigation and trial processes, especially for crimes against women and children, and prioritizing the rights and dignity of individuals. Stay informed and engaged as we continue to explore the impact of these transformative changes. #CriminalJusticeReform #NewLaws #ModernIndia #LegalUpdate #JusticeForAll #Bharatiya
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
My personal opinions only. 100% agree. Due to the constitutional separation of power, there's a defined limit on what provinces can do to "enforce the law", especially if the criminal law itself which is under federal purview has gaps and loopholes that are being abused. Our police can arrest endlessly on their end but if the criminal system ultimately fails, there's no end to the ongoing problems. The lack of accountability and the seeming avoidance of actions that may affect their voting base at federal level are disappointing. Private sector simply has no meaningful tools to address retail crimes without trespassing legal considerations. There's a very restrictive limit to how much a retailer can reasonably prevent or defend itself from even violent retail crimes. How far can retailers set up surveillance for crime prevention? How much can retailers physically defend themselves against thefts or abusive behavior from customers? How much technology can retailers reasonably use to prevent crimes without being criticized for privacy or human rights considerations? If the government isn't stepping up to improve the environment, private sector will continue to have a bleak outlook especially for SMEs.
General Manager Loss Prevention, Thought Leader, Board Member, Speaker, Consultant, Commentator, Educator. #BCSaveOurStreets
I want to share my personal opinion on the article below, and the ongoing discussion, (perhaps finger-pointing) going on regarding public safety and bail reform. In a recent follow-up letter on bail reform (link to article below), the Premiers have expressed serious concerns about our current bail system, even after the introduction of Bill C-48. They highlight numerous instances where bail has failed to protect Canadians, especially from violent offenders. Premiers argue that Bill C-48 does not go far enough and call for more stringent measures to ensure public safety. Both federal and provincial governments must collaborate to reform the bail system effectively. The Premiers’ letter also addresses inadequacies in the legal framework, which are particularly problematic given the long prosecution times. Federal Justice Minister Arif Virani states that provinces need to better enforce existing laws and collect data to evaluate the bail system's effectiveness. While the Minister raises a valid point, his stance overlooks the federal government’s role in drafting the narrow criteria for denying bail, which often allows offenders to be released. The Premiers are right to call this out, more needs to be done. In response, I think Minister Virani has a point, the Premier's and their Attorney's General must do more, but the Federal Justice Minster manages to look past his own Government's opportunity to act. The call to action is clear: Get it together! Real people and our communities need to be protected. We need immediate reforms and enhanced cooperation to protect our communities from repeat violent AND non-violent offenders. #BCSaveOurStreets #BailReform #TooMuchViolence #RetailMatters #Canada https://lnkd.in/gz-gp3kB
Liberal ministers rebuke premiers, tell them to 'enforce the law' on bail for violent offenders
msn.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Indian Supreme Court's recent deliberations on the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) underscore the tension between individual liberties and strict bail conditions under Section 45. While the Court has emphasized the constitutional mandate for a speedy trial and criticized lower courts for their cautious stance, which exacerbates judicial backlogs, concerns about pre-trial detention and procedural flaws in PMLA cases persist. The "twin conditions" for bail, requiring the accused to prove prima facie innocence and non-recidivism, continue to pose significant challenges. For more, you may read my latest TOI article: https://lnkd.in/gDBwE3MN #BailOrJail #PMLA #SupremeCourt #LegalRights #IndianJudiciary #MoneyLaundering #Section45 #CriminalLaw #VivekNarayanSharma #ConstitutionalLaw #Article21 #JudicialReview #LegalAnalysis #advocate #lawyer
Bail or Jail: The supreme court’s struggle with PMLA’s twin conditions
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
To view or add a comment, sign in