Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Representative Office in Central Asia’s Post

🇺🇿 In 2023, Uzbekistan introduced the concept of a "social state” into its Constitution. However, questions remain regarding what this term truly entails and how it will be implemented in a nation balancing socialism, capitalism, and traditional Islam. While the Uzbek government promotes this idea as a foundation for reforms, the reality is complex and often unclear. 🔸Increased Social Inequality: According to the World Bank, inequality has significantly widened, with the richest 10% of the population seeing a 30% rise in income, while the poorest have experienced only a 6% increase. Despite government pledges to improve social welfare, the benefits have largely favored the affluent. 🔸Power Centralization: The idea of a social state has become closely associated with the presidency, shifting the focus from societal welfare to reinforcing governmental authority. This centralization limits public participation and positions citizens as passive recipients of state-provided benefits. 🔸Control Through Social Initiatives: Programs like the “mahalla seven” show how social care is often employed as a mechanism for control. While these local committees are meant to support low-income families, they also act as state surveillance tools, reinforcing governmental power at the grassroots level. While Uzbekistan’s social state concept promises significant change, the reality is more complex, with entrenched power structures and mixed ideologies clouding its path. Will these reforms lead to meaningful improvement, or are they merely a tool to maintain the status quo? For those interested in a deeper dive, you can read the full article on the site: https://lnkd.in/ectSPy9a

  • background pattern

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics