Reminder: Regular code reviews can drastically improve your team's coding standards. Explore effective strategies in the Software Development Playbook. 🔍 https://lnkd.in/eeCk3xGE
RouteTrackDeliver’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Reminder: Regular code reviews can drastically improve your team's coding standards. Explore effective strategies in the Software Development Playbook. 🔍 https://lnkd.in/eeCk3xGE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Reminder: Regular code reviews can drastically improve your team's coding standards. Explore effective strategies in the Software Development Playbook. 🔍 https://lnkd.in/esaAkZDp
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Reminder: Regular code reviews can drastically improve your team's coding standards. Explore effective strategies in the Software Development Playbook. 🔍 https://lnkd.in/eeCk3xGE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Is your code maintainable and easy to understand? 🧑💻 I just published an article on how the Broken Window Theory applies to software development, and how even small coding flaws can snowball into larger, harder-to-fix problems. 🛠️ In this piece, I dive into the importance of clean code, the role of tools like flake8 and black, and how you can keep your project healthy, maintainable, and scalable by preventing technical debt.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔍 The peer code review process often lacks well-defined standards, particularly when it comes to entry criteria. In many teams, it's common (and sometimes acceptable) to submit code for peer review without even looking it over yourself first. This practice is not a good use of anyone's time. Our industry needs to start defining and enforcing some basic entry criteria for peer reviews. We should make it part of the software development culture to have clear entry criteria for this process. Just as it's unimaginable not to use version control or have unit tests, it should be equally unimaginable not to have well-defined standards for peer code review. Let's elevate our code quality and efficiency by setting the bar higher for our reviews. Check out my latest blog post to learn more about establishing a solid "Definition of Ready" for peer reviews. https://lnkd.in/ebntvvBt #CodeReview #SoftwareDevelopment #BestPractices #CodingStandards #QualityAssurance #DefinitionOfReady
Peer Code Review | A Definition of "Ready for Review": Part II
thepassionatecoder.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Legacy code projects struggle before coding even begins. Which features are implemented where at what maturity level is often unclear. In short, a gap exists between the business domain and what is implemented in code. At Build Stuff - Software Development Conference in two weeks I'll present the patterns that we need to rediscover the domain. Attendees can expect to gain practical insights, methodologies, and practical tips to tackle the challenges associated with legacy codebases. By embracing domain rediscovery patterns, developers can bring order and coherence to legacy systems, paving the way for future enhancements and system evolution.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Revolutionizing Development : Exploring Low Code Development, Techniques, and Use Cases:- https://lnkd.in/dt5j5C8M
Revolutionizing Development : Exploring Low Code Development, Techniques, and Use Cases
glitchbyte.in
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you want to become a world-class software engineer (in 8 months or less), read these books: 1/ The Pragmatic Programmer: It'll teach you the core software development process. Authors: Dave Thomas & Andy Hunt 2/ The Mythical Man-Month: It'll give you advice and opinions on the management of large-scale projects. Author: Fred Brooks 3/ Refactoring: It'll give you techniques to restructure code to enhance its maintainability. Authors: Kent Beck & Martin Fowler 4/ Working Effectively with Legacy Code: It'll teach you techniques to refactor legacy code. Author: Michael C. Feathers 5/ Clean Code: It'll teach you practices to write code that is easy to understand and refactor. Author: Robert C. Martin 6/ Domain-Driven Design: It'll teach you principles and patterns to design complex software systems. Author: Eric Evans 7/ Why Programs Fail: It'll teach you systematic debugging. Author: Andreas Zeller 8/ Designing Data-Intensive Applications: It'll teach you distributed systems. Author: Martin Kleppmann What else would you add? ⬳ 👋 PS - Join 100K+ people and get the powerful system design template (it's free): → https://lnkd.in/ed4URjuY ⬳ If you liked this post: 🔔 Follow Neo Kim ♻ Repost to help others find it 💾 Save this post for future reference
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Revolutionizing Development : Exploring Low Code Development, Techniques, and Use Cases #miracle #software #systems #development #code #techniques #case #webinar
Revolutionizing Development : Exploring Low Code Development, Techniques, and Use Cases:- https://lnkd.in/dt5j5C8M
Revolutionizing Development : Exploring Low Code Development, Techniques, and Use Cases
glitchbyte.in
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you're a software engineer looking to level up, here are 3 books you need to master 🚀 1. The Pragmatic Programmer - 53 topics about perfecting your craft (https://lnkd.in/dcghaKhV) 2. Clean Code - deep dive on the difference between code that works and code that lasts a lifetime (https://lnkd.in/dnz4Ve4D) 3. Clean Architecture - the best explanation of software architecture ever (https://lnkd.in/dEZhcYZK) I reference at least one of these books daily.
To view or add a comment, sign in
50 followers