👓 ⚖️ 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐍𝐞𝐫𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐫: A concise overview of key judgments and advisory opinions cited during the first seven days of oral hearings at the 🌐 🧑⚖️ International Court of Justice (ICJ) on States' obligations in the context of climate change. The majority of these references aim to ensure that the forthcoming ICJ advisory opinion builds on a robust body of jurisprudence, affirming States' extensive legal obligations under international law and outlining remedies for breaches. This coordinated effort by numerous States underscores the importance of integrating rich legal precedents, contrasting sharply with the stance of many fossil fuel producers, who disingenuously argue that the Paris Agreement is the sole source of States' obligations, seeking to sideline broader legal principles and norms. 👀 if there are other cases that you would like me to search for, please do let me know in the comments below. There were no references that I could find so far to the La Oroya case for instance. * Note that this also includes the references contained in the footnotes. And for the true international law nerds, do not worry: cases such as Barcelona Traction, the Iron Rhine Arbitration, Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru... I will provide an updated mapping of these references at the end of the hearings. #ClimateJusticeAtTheICJ #AOLetsGo #InternationalLaw
And for nerds who studied under Alan E. Boyle, the Pulp Mills case is plural since there were 2 mills in question. Keep up the great summaries and thank you!
Heather Maseko-Msyale FYI Val…we need a coffee chat soon to talk about everything! #CorfuChannel
Portillo Cáceres mentioned yesterday too 👀
Treasure trove! Thanks!
Senior Attorney and Human Rights & Climate Campaign Manager at Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
1moThere were also 24 references to the ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.