I commend our Kentucky legislature for their ongoing efforts to enhance school safety. However, I have some reservations regarding this senate bill. The bill proposes that school districts be permitted to directly employ retired law enforcement officers, recently honorably discharged veterans, and former federal law enforcement officers.
Under the proposed legislation, these individuals would undergo training, including the first level of school resource officer training, as well as instruction on firearms proficiency and responding to active shooter situations. Additionally, they would be authorized to carry concealed weapons on school premises. This solution raises a few questions and concerns.
One concern pertains to policy and procedures. Currently, School Resource Officers (SROs) are generally employed by a local law enforcement agency and assigned to a school campus. This arrangement typically involves shared payroll costs between the district and the agency, with the agency providing equipment and uniforms. Moreover, the officers adhere to their agency's policies and procedures. Since officers usually work for a county or city agency, they have authority beyond the school grounds, which is useful for welfare checks or home visits, would this authority extend to guardians?
Under the current bill, it is assumed that these policy responsibilities would fall on the district. Furthermore, questions arise regarding vehicles; if a guardian drives between campuses, or performs a home visit, would they use a district vehicle equipped with emergency equipment? While I am certain that many of these details will be addressed, it is crucial for school districts to thoroughly consider these factors.
As with many decisions, it is imperative that districts take into account these and many other questions before deciding to hire a guardian. #schoolsafety #SROS #Schoolleadership #schoolsecurity #superintendents #schoolboards #EducationLeaders
