Stephen Larcombe’s Post

These are wise words by Iain Miller. Healthy democracies are underpinned by a robust rule of law. This in turn means a strong, independent legal profession. Since 1997 the legal system has not only been drained of resources, it has also been slowly suffocated by over-regulation. The contradictions and inconsistencies of badly drawn legislation must not be allowed to impede the delivery of justice. #propertylawyersactiongroup

SRA looks to regulate legal executives The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) plans to regulate legal executives, but there are potential political and legal hurdles to overcome. The SRA believes that regulating legal executives would simplify the legal regulatory landscape and make it easier for consumers to navigate the system. However, the proposal would still need approval from CILEX and the Legal Services Board. The Law Society council could pose a major obstacle as it has expressed opposition to the move. The SRA argues that regulating legal executives would lead to a simpler system, consistent levels of protection for consumers, and efficiency benefits. The proposal aims to address the complexity of the current regulatory landscape and benefit the public.

In advance of today’s launch of the Midlands Private Law strategy, Kerry Cockayne explores how this dovetails with the upcoming amendments to the Family Procedure Rules 2010 in respect of the utility of MIAMs and ADR. https://lnkd.in/e9KcVgWF

The legal sector needs reform, and lawyers have a crucial role in achieving this. There are three ways in which they can help: first, by increasing the number of lawyers through removing barriers to entry; second, by improving the quality of lawyers and their capacity to provide high-value services; and third, by encouraging reformist lawyers who advocate for regulatory governance reform and better justice infrastructure. Lawyers alone cannot solve all problems, but they must step up and accept responsibility for building a just and effective legal sector.

🔍 The European Commission's Rule of Law report identifies lengthy court proceedings in Cyprus as a significant concern for businesses. Learn about the challenges and what can be done to improve the situation. 📖 Read the full article https://lnkd.in/dSTEeB7i #Law #Business #Cyprus #ECReport #LegalReform

It has been my privilege to serve as the President of the Board of Directors for the Administrative Law Section of the Austin Bar Association this past year. The Section has a great year ahead under the leadership of our incoming President Thomas Tynes, and I look forward to continuing to support the Board! #AdminLaw #Regulatory

How does the arbitrary and capricious standard compare to other legal standards of review? The arbitrary and capricious standard is a fundamental concept in administrative law that plays a crucial role in how courts evaluate the actions and decisions of government agencies. This standard of review is often compared to other legal benchmarks used in various contexts of judicial scrutiny. Understanding how the arbitrary and capricious standard compares to other legal standards of review is essential for legal professionals, policymakers, and anyone involved in the intricate world of administrative decision-making and judicial oversight. At its core, the arbitrary and capricious standard is used by courts to determine whether an administrative agency's decision was made on a reasonable basis and within the scope of its authority. This standard is typically applied when reviewing agency actions under the Administrative Pro... #administrativelaw #agencyactions #arbitraryandcapricious #courtdecisions #decisionmaking #JudicialReview #legalbenchmarks #legalscrutiny #LegalStandards #standardofreview #AdministrativeLaw #CivilLitigation #CourtDecision #GovernmentRelations #JudicialMisconduct #LegalAdviceandConsultation #LegalCommentary #LegalProcedures #LegalRepresentation #RiskManagement

The law ministry has pitched for the incorporation of a “sunset” clause or automatic repeal provision in certain type of bills to de-clutter statute books and has put it in its 100-day agenda. Our Partner, Alay Razvi shares his comments with The Economic Times in an article titled, "Law ministry pitches for sunset clause; fosters clarity and efficiency within the system, says Legal Experts." Read more at : https://lnkd.in/g_8cR88j #knowledgesharing #opinion #dipsuteresolution #lawministry #lawfirm

"After a preliminary review of Bill 21, the Federation echoed the Law Society of British Columbia's concerns that the legislation does not adequately protect the independence of the legal professions and their regulation, which are crucial to upholding democratic principles." (Canadian Lawyer) https://lnkd.in/eBpHwqDs #legalprofession #futureoflaw #legalindustry

Arbitrary and capricious vs. substantial evidence: Key differences explained In the realm of administrative law, two critical standards of review often come into play when courts examine agency decisions: the arbitrary and capricious standard and the substantial evidence test. These standards serve as fundamental tools for judicial oversight of administrative actions, each with its own distinct characteristics and applications. Understanding the key differences between these standards is crucial for legal practitioners, agency officials, and anyone involved in the administrative process. The arbitrary and capricious standard, derived from the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), is a cornerstone of judicial review for agency actions. This standard requires courts to hold unlawful and set aside agency actions that are found to be "arbitrary, capriciou... #administrativelawreview #administrativestateevaluation #agencyactionevaluation #agencydecisionscrutiny #courtdecisionimpacts #judicialreviewcriteria #legalreasoningassessment #legalstandardanalysis #regulatorycomplianceassessment #regulatoryoversightreview #AdministrativeLaw #ConstitutionalLaw #CourtDecision #FederalLaw #GovernmentRelations #JudicialReview #LegalCommentary #LegalLiability #LegalProcedures #RegulatoryCompliance