SUBRATA SAHA’s Post

Statutory audits are conducted to verify the accuracy of financial statements and ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Here are the typical steps involved in a statutory audit: Planning: Understanding the business: The auditor obtains knowledge of the entity's operations, industry, regulatory environment, and other relevant factors. Risk assessment: Identify and assess risks of material misstatement in the financial statements due to fraud or error. Audit strategy: Develop an overall audit strategy, including determining the scope, timing, and resources required for the audit. Internal Control Evaluation: Assess the effectiveness of internal controls relevant to the audit. This involves understanding the entity's control environment, risk assessment processes, control activities, information systems, and monitoring activities. Substantive Procedures: Testing transactions: Selecting transactions and testing their occurrence, completeness, accuracy, and authorization. Analytical procedures: Evaluating financial information through analysis of plausible relationships and trends. Testing balances: Verifying account balances through examination of supporting documentation and performing reconciliation procedures. Audit Evidence: Collect sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the conclusions on which the auditor's opinion is based. This includes documentation, confirmations, observations, and analytical procedures. Audit Adjustments: Propose adjustments to the financial statements if discrepancies or errors are found during the audit process. These adjustments are discussed with management for agreement and correction. Audit Report: Opinion: Formulate an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements in all material respects. Report: Issue an audit report that includes the auditor's opinion, which may be unqualified (clean), qualified, adverse, or a disclaimer of opinion, depending on the findings of the audit. Communications: Discuss audit findings and recommendations with management and those charged with governance. Report any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal controls identified during the audit. Completion: Document the audit findings, conclusions, and the basis for the audit opinion in an audit file. Obtain management representation letters and other required documentation. Follow-up: Address any outstanding issues or concerns with management and ensure that all necessary adjustments have been made to the financial statements. Final Review: Review the completed audit file and ensure all procedures have been adequately documented and all necessary approvals obtained. These steps provide a structured approach to conducting a statutory audit, ensuring thoroughness and compliance with auditing standards and regulatory requirements.

Statutory audits are conducted to verify the accuracy of financial statements and ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Here are the typical steps involved in a statutory audit: Planning: Understanding the business: The auditor obtains knowledge of the entity's operations, industry, regulatory environment, and other relevant factors. Risk assessment: Identify and assess risks of material misstatement in the financial statements due to fraud or error. Audit strategy: Develop an overall audit strategy, including determining the scope, timing, and resources required for the audit. Internal Control Evaluation: Assess the effectiveness of internal controls relevant to the audit. This involves understanding the entity's control environment, risk assessment processes, control activities, information systems, and monitoring activities. Substantive Procedures: Testing transactions: Selecting transactions and testing their occurrence, completeness, accuracy, and authorization. Analytical procedures: Evaluating financial information through analysis of plausible relationships and trends. Testing balances: Verifying account balances through examination of supporting documentation and performing reconciliation procedures. Audit Evidence: Collect sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the conclusions on which the auditor's opinion is based. This includes documentation, confirmations, observations, and analytical procedures. Audit Adjustments: Propose adjustments to the financial statements if discrepancies or errors are found during the audit process. These adjustments are discussed with management for agreement and correction. Audit Report: Opinion: Formulate an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements in all material respects. Report: Issue an audit report that includes the auditor's opinion, which may be unqualified (clean), qualified, adverse, or a disclaimer of opinion, depending on the findings of the audit. Communications: Discuss audit findings and recommendations with management and those charged with governance. Report any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal controls identified during the audit. Completion: Document the audit findings, conclusions, and the basis for the audit opinion in an audit file. Obtain management representation letters and other required documentation. Follow-up: Address any outstanding issues or concerns with management and ensure that all necessary adjustments have been made to the financial statements. Final Review: Review the completed audit file and ensure all procedures have been adequately documented and all necessary approvals obtained. These steps provide a structured approach to conducting a statutory audit, ensuring thoroughness and compliance with auditing standards and regulatory requirements.

The process of creating a financial audit typically involves several steps: 1. **Planning**: This involves understanding the client's business and its internal control systems, identifying risks, and determining the audit approach. 2. **Risk Assessment**: Assessing the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements due to error or fraud. 3. **Internal Control Evaluation**: Evaluating the effectiveness of the client's internal controls over financial reporting. 4. **Substantive Testing**: Performing tests on account balances, transactions, and disclosures to detect material misstatements. 5. **Audit Evidence**: Collecting sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to support the audit opinion. 6. **Analytical Procedures**: Comparing financial information with expectations and investigating significant differences. 7. **Financial Statement Review**: Reviewing the financial statements for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with accounting standards. 8. **Reporting**: Communicating the findings and conclusions in the form of an audit report, which includes the auditor's opinion on the fairness of the financial statements. 9. **Follow-Up**: Addressing any issues or recommendations identified during the audit process and ensuring they are appropriately resolved. Throughout these steps, auditors must adhere to professional standards and maintain independence and objectivity. Additionally, the specific procedures and depth of testing may vary based on the nature and size of the client's business, as well as regulatory requirements.

Top 10 Internal Audit Domain Questions - 1. What are the differences between statutory audits and performance audits? 2. What is the difference between process and controls? 3. Explain Top-Down Approach. What do you mean by Bottom-Up Approach? 4. What Audit procedures will you apply to audit cash and cash equivalents? 5. What is Internal Financial Control? 6. What are the key elements In an Internal Audit Report? 7. Key principles that an Internal Auditor must possess and apply during audits? 8. Few indicators of a possible fraud? 9. What are the phases of a Risk Based Audit? 10. Why is there a need for the internal checks? These are some of the most important questions for the Internal Audit Domain. For more such questions of different domains and other help of CA, you can join my Telegram channel - https://t.me/ishwinkaur NOTE - If you get stuck in any of the question and want a simplified answer of the same, you can mail me at sumankaur1169@gmail.com or DM me for the same.

Here are the key differences between the four terms related to assurance in auditing: 1.Absolute Assurance: -This refers to the highest level of assurance that can be provided. - It means that the auditor can state with 100% certainty that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. - Absolute assurance is not achievable in practice due to the inherent limitations of auditing. 2. Reasonable Assurance: - This is the typical level of assurance provided in a standard financial statement audit. - It means the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Reasonable assurance is less than absolute assurance, but it is a high level of assurance. 3.Limited Assurance: - This refers to a lower level of assurance than reasonable assurance. - It means the auditor has obtained enough evidence to provide a conclusion, but the scope of work is more limited than a full audit. Examples include review engagements and agreed-upon procedures engagements. 4. Conclusion: - This is the final outcome or opinion expressed by the auditor based on the level of assurance obtained. - In a reasonable assurance audit, the conclusion is an audit opinion (unmodified, qualified, adverse, or disclaimer). - In a limited assurance engagement, the conclusion is typically expressed as a “conclusion” rather than an opinion. In summary, absolute assurance is the highest but unattainable level, reasonable assurance is the audit standard level, limited assurance is a lower level, and the conclusion is the final outcome statement based on the level of assurance obtained

Internal Auditor (IA): Definition, Process, and Example What Is an Internal Auditor (IA)? An internal auditor (IA) is a trained professional employed by companies to provide independent and objective evaluations of financial and operational business activities, including corporate governance. They are tasked with ensuring that companies comply with laws and regulations, follow proper procedures, and function as efficiently as possible. Understanding an Internal Auditor (IA) The main job of an internal auditor (IA) is to identify problems and correct them before they are discovered during an external audit by an outside firm or regulatory agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). One of the roles of the SEC is to regulate how companies report their financial statements to help ensure that investors have access to all of the necessary information before investing. An internal audit generally performs the three tasks outlined below. - Assess any risks and the internal controls within a company - Ensure that a company and its employees are in compliance with federal and state laws and regulations - Make suggestions as to what needs to be done to rectify a failed audit or issues that were identified as problematic during the audit Internal Auditing Process To achieve this goal, internal auditors will typically perform a multitude of tasks, including examining financial statements, expense reports, inventory, financial data, budgeting and accounting practices, as well as creating risk assessments for each department. Detailed notes are taken, interviews with employees are conducted, work schedules are supervised, physical assets are verified, and financial statements are scrutinized to eliminate potentially damaging errors or falsehoods and find ways to boost productivity.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST Conflict of interest in the context of internal audit activity refers to a situation where the auditor's personal or financial interests conflict with their duty to provide objective and unbiased assessments of an organization's operations, processes, or financial statements. This conflict can compromise the integrity and independence of the internal audit function, thereby undermining its effectiveness in identifying risks, assessing controls, and providing reliable recommendations for improvement. Internal auditors are expected to maintain a high level of objectivity and impartiality in their work to ensure that their findings and recommendations are free from any bias or undue influence. However, conflicts of interest may arise in various scenarios, including: Financial Interests: When internal auditors have a financial stake in the organization or its stakeholders, such as owning company stock, receiving bonuses tied to financial performance, or having investments in entities that the organization does business with, it can potentially influence their judgment and lead to biased reporting. Personal Relationships: Relationships with individuals within the organization, such as family members, friends, or former colleagues, can create conflicts of interest if these relationships compromise the auditor's ability to remain objective and independent in their assessments. Dual Roles: Internal auditors may hold dual roles within the organization, such as also serving in operational or managerial positions. This dual role can create conflicts of interest when auditing areas where they have responsibilities or when their performance in one role is evaluated based on the outcomes of the other role. External Activities: Involvement in external activities, such as serving on the board of directors of a vendor or competitor, can create conflicts of interest if these activities create competing loyalties or influence the auditor's objectivity in assessing related transactions or relationships. Conflicts of interest undermine the credibility of the internal audit function and can lead to biased reporting, inaccurate assessments of risks and controls, and ineffective recommendations for improvement. To mitigate conflicts of interest, organizations should establish and enforce policies and procedures that promote independence and objectivity among internal auditors. This may include implementing codes of conduct, disclosing potential conflicts of interest, establishing rotation policies for auditors, and providing training on ethical principles and professional standards. Additionally, internal auditors should regularly assess their own potential conflicts of interest and take appropriate measures to avoid or manage them to uphold the integrity of their work.

To plan and execute financial statement and operational audits, follow these steps: Financial Statement Audit: 1. Risk Assessment: Identify areas of high risk, such as revenue recognition or inventory valuation. 2. Scoping: Determine the scope of the audit, including the financial statements and periods to be audited. 3. Planning: Develop an audit plan, including procedures and timelines. 4. Testing: Perform substantive tests and controls tests, such as: - Transaction testing (e.g., sales, purchases) - Balance sheet account testing (e.g., cash, accounts receivable) - Internal control testing (e.g., segregation of duties, authorization) 5. Reporting: Issue an audit report, including an opinion on the financial statements and any material weaknesses or deficiencies. Operational Audit: 1. Risk Assessment: Identify areas of high risk, such as inefficiencies or non-compliance. 2. Scoping: Determine the scope of the audit, including the processes and areas to be audited. 3. Planning: Develop an audit plan, including procedures and timelines. 4. Testing: Perform tests of operational effectiveness and efficiency, such as: - Process mapping and walkthroughs - Transaction testing (e.g., purchasing, payroll) - Compliance testing (e.g., regulatory requirements) 5. Reporting: Issue an audit report, including recommendations for improvement and any material weaknesses or deficiencies. Additional considerations: - Coordinate with management and audit committees - Consider materiality and risk when scoping and testing - Use professional skepticism and judgment - Document all procedures and findings - Communicate results and recommendations to stakeholders By following these steps, I can effectively plan and execute financial statement and operational audits to provide assurance and drive improvement.

WHEN THE INDEPENDENCE AND INTEGRITY OF AN INTERNAL AUDITOR IS AT STAKE. The independence and integrity of an Internal Auditor is important in the audit process and positively affects audit quality. * When an Internal Auditor is made to depend totally on certain individuals working in an organisation for outstanding financial settlement, he/she might be tempted to compromise just to have his outstanding amount settled. Internal Auditors should not be put at the mercy of other staff working in an Organization. * In a situation where an Internal Auditor feels threatened that he/she might loose his/her job anytime, some might be tempted to go against the core values of their profession. Internal Auditors should be given safe environment to operate. An organisational structure should be designed such that the Internal Auditor is independent of other staff and report directly to management. * Most organisations do not have Audit Department. In some organisations, Internal Auditors are placed under Account or Admin Department. With this arrangement, the tendency for an Internal Auditor to present a report that will put his department in a good light is there. To avoid this, a separate office and department should be created for Auditors. * Another factor that may question the independence and integrity of an Internal Auditor is 'Over Familiarity With Other Employees and Officers at work'. A case was reported where an Internal Auditor was allerged to be involved in an illicit relationship with a cashier. On investigation, it was discovered that; it was deliberate and calculated step (Set-up) in alliance with other staff, so that they can take undue advantage of the system and the Auditor will be hands bound. The organisation within that period, incurred monumental losses because the Auditor did everything to cover them up so as to avoid scandal. * Where the activities of an Internal Auditor is not protected or supported by top management in an organisation, he could be intimidated by fellow staff and this will deter him from acting objectively if he is not courageous. * Financial Inducement and unsolicited gifts from fellow staff is another factor. When an Internal Auditor is not satisfied with his pay, he might be tempted to receive financial tips and gifts from others. This act can influence his opinion when writing report. To check this, management of an organisation should exercise caution when sourcing for an Internal Auditor. Impromptu External Audit (Mid-year Audit) can help in situations like this, so that things will not get out of hand. Uduak-Obong Nkanta

Integrity is paramount in the fields of audit and finance. Without integrity, even the best work and expertise can be undermined and rendered meaningless. Here are some reasons why integrity is crucial in audit and finance: 1. Trust and Confidence: Integrity is the cornerstone of trust and confidence in the audit and finance industry. Clients, investors, and stakeholders rely on financial professionals to provide accurate, reliable, and unbiased information. Without integrity, trust is broken, and confidence in the financial system is compromised. 2. Ethical Standards: Integrity is closely linked to ethical behavior in audit and finance. Professionals in these fields are expected to adhere to high ethical standards, including honesty, objectivity, and transparency. Without integrity, ethical breaches can occur, leading to fraud, corruption, and unethical practices. 3. Professionalism: Integrity is a key component of professionalism in audit and finance. Professionals are expected to act with integrity, uphold ethical standards, and maintain the highest levels of honesty and integrity in their work. Without integrity, professionalism is called into question, and credibility is lost. 4. Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Integrity is essential for compliance with laws and regulations in audit and finance. Professionals must adhere to strict guidelines and standards to ensure the accuracy and reliability of financial information. Without integrity, there is a risk of non-compliance, which can result in legal and regulatory repercussions. 5. Reputation and Relationships: Integrity plays a crucial role in shaping the reputation and relationships of individuals and organizations in audit and finance. Those who demonstrate integrity are seen as trustworthy, reliable, and ethical, enhancing their reputation and building strong relationships with clients, colleagues, and stakeholders. Without integrity, reputation is tarnished, and relationships are damaged. In summary, integrity is a foundational value in audit and finance. Professionals in these fields must prioritize integrity in their work to maintain trust, uphold ethical standards, and build strong relationships with clients and stakeholders. Without integrity, the credibility and reputation of individuals and organizations in audit and finance are at risk.