Susanne Munksted’s Post

Breakthrough approach on MRD which could significantly impact timelines on getting new treatments to patients. If you have not accessed the Diaceutics report on MRD read more at the link below and get in touch. Dr Bob Holt #precisionmedicine #patients #FDA #MRD #cancer

View profile for Dr Bob Holt, graphic

Senior Director at Diaceutics PLC

This Friday an FDA advisory committee will meet to discuss the results of a new meta-analysis on the use of minimal residual disease (MRD) as an endpoint to support the accelerated approval of new drugs in multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, drugs in MM are approved based on clinical benefit endpoints, leading to lengthy clinical trials and drug approval timelines and ultimately delays in offering patients potentially beneficial treatments. MRD testing can measure a patients response to treatment by the use of sensitive technologies which measure the level of tumor cells in a patient’s blood. The use of MRD results as an endpoint for drug approval would allow MRD testing to be used to demonstrate drug efficacy instead of clinical response thus shortening clinical trial and drug development times. A recent Diaceutics report on the use and perceptions of MRD found the majority of hematoncologists were comfortable with the use of MRD as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. If implemented, this would represent a paradigm shift in the approval of novel therapies. While this discussion is currently limited to MM, the scope for using MRD in drug development and the management of patients is currently being investigated in multiple haematological and solid tumor indications. MRD has the potential to become routine clinical practice in the management of oncology indications and would enable the early detection of disease relapse and allow patient treatments to be adapted accordingly. View the Diaceutics report on MRD at https://lnkd.in/eKu4imxW

About the report

About the report

lp.diaceutics.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics