system masood’s Post

Are you going through the same design process? 🤔 Every project starts with a vision, but what comes next? Whether you're a designer, architect, or engineer, the journey can be complex. From sketches ✏️ to final blueprints 📐, finding the right tools and resources is key. Explore new ideas, connect with professionals, and streamline your workflow with Plandi.io 🌐✨! #DesignProcess #Architecture #ProjectPlanning #DesignTools #WorkFlow #Plandi #DesignerCommunity #FreelanceArchitect #BIM #ConstructionInnovation #SketchToReality #FreelanceDesign

It's just a render. Three words that undervalue an entire industry. Yet, Archviz is more than just creating compelling images; it's about storytelling, understanding architecture, and foreseeing the future. Think about it. Every groundbreaking building once started as a vision in someone's mind. Archviz is the bridge between imagination and reality. It's not merely about making pretty pictures, but about solving real architectural challenges before they arise. It's about testing the waters of innovation, sustainability, and functionality. This field demands a blend of technical skill and creative vision, a unique mix that often goes unrecognized. Archviz professionals dive deep into the architect's mind, bringing to life what hasn't been built yet. They allow us to see the potential of spaces, influencing decisions long before the first stone is laid. Yet, the misconception persists. Archviz isn't just a final step in the presentation; it's a crucial phase in the design process. It deserves more than a passing glance. It deserves recognition for its role in shaping our built environment. Let's start giving Archviz the credit it's due. Engage if you agree. Share your thoughts on how Archviz has impacted your view of architecture and design.

Switch.. How it all started?   Space.. experiencing the spaces that you've had a hand in designing and constructing is truly rewarding. Witnessing your work materialize into something tangible, something that will likely stand there for several years, is an incredible feeling. More importantly, you've contributed to creating spaces where others can live, work or simply enjoy their time.   But how often does this happen to an architect? Honestly, not as often as you might think..   I love to work on large, complex projects which means ca. 5-10years of work to see the result, if everything goes as planned. Being a classical architect on these projects feels like this: You're given a task, you dive into it, luckily find cool solution maybe together with some other professional, but then you have to discuss it with project leader / partner / investor and then comes of course the budget and basically in every phase of the project it can be changed again.. So by the end of it all, it kinda feels like your input didn't really make a difference.   So what were the main reasons I switched from being classical architect to be CAD/BIM Specialist?   - I sensed a vibrant surge of progress in the realm of IT and digitalization, while architecture seemed to lag behind, particularly architectural firms.   - Deprivation when changing something in the project meant "pulling lines and hatches," leading to a lack of interdependence among plans and missing information or progress from other colleagues in files.   - I encountered a challenge with the decision-making process in architecture. While we all strive for the perfect solution, it can vary from person to person and from day to day. I found that I needed a more logic- and data-driven approach to decision-making.   - Common statement, that architects are not IT people - yes.. maybe.. but once I am working with the computer every day, I should understand some basics and not blaming all the time the "stupid graphic program" and think for a moment what I have done in that program several moments before it crashed.   - General issues with efficiency in architecture - creating versions, changing things at last moment..   Do not be afraid to go for the change, if you're not happy or you're ready for more! ............................................................... Follow for more. #dropofspace #thoughts #bimmodeling #aecindustry  

A building without crediting the architect? Unthinkable. A rendering without credits? Unfortunately, common. Last week, I came across a post by my colleague Matteo Ferrari 🎨✏️ He shared his fallout with a client who refused to credit him for his work. All of this, despite a crystal-clear contract. This isn't just an isolated incident. It highlights a broader issue within our industry. Here's my stance: In my contracts, clients receive a license to use the work, not ownership. They can showcase the images, share with partners, but edits are off-limits. And credit must always be given to The Big Picture. Fair, isn't it? Yet, as Matteo's case shows, it's not always straightforward. Architects, your perspective is essential here. Architectural projects, often unbuilt, remain ideas until realized. The architect owns these ideas, but the visualization? It's a creation that brings these ideas to light. It is similar to how a photographer owns the copyright of their images. What is your take on this? How do you see the crediting of archviz work against this backdrop? /// Hi, I'm Federico, archviz tutor and director at The Big Picture. Since 2014, I've helped architects and developers bring ideas to life through visuals. 🤝 Follow or connect for more archviz insights! ♻ Repost if you find this helpful! 

Form follows Function ... There is an expression "Form follows Function". It is a principle of design associated with late 19th- and early 20th-century architecture (and industrial design in general). It states that the shape of a building or object should primarily relate to its intended function or purpose. Makes perfect sense, really. But what does Function follow? I suggest that "Function follows Flow" This principle that suggests the function or purpose of something should be shaped by the flow of energy, information, or activity that moves through it. Here are a few ways to think about this idea: In systems design, the functions of components are often determined by understanding the flows of inputs and outputs between them. The flow of data or materials through a system guides the roles and operations of its parts. In process design (part of our work), the function of each step or stage is defined by its place in the overall flow of work. The sequence and interaction of activities shapes the purpose of each step. In organisational design (another part of our work), the functions of teams and individuals are frequently determined by the flows of communication, decision-making, and work that connect them. The patterns of collaboration and coordination shape roles and responsibilities. In nature, the functions of organisms and ecosystems are often a response to the flows of energy, nutrients, and information in their environment. The flows of resources and signals shape the roles and behaviours of living things. The principle of "function follows flow" suggests that to understand and design effective functions, we need to first map and understand the flows they are a part of. By optimising and aligning these flows, we can create functions that emerge naturally and perform well. This is a different but related idea to the first idea of "Form follows Function," which is about how the shape of something should be based on its purpose. "Function follows flow" is more about how purpose is shaped by the context of movement and exchange it is embedded in. So, if Form follows Function and Function follows Flow, what does Flow follow? LinkedIn doesn't allow me enough words to tell you that yet - you'll have to wait for the next post! In the meantime, interested in your ideas below!

I remember when I thought architectural design was all about endless manual revisions and gut-driven creativity. Then I discovered computational design, and wow—it completely changed the game. Imagine this: 1,000 design iterations generated and analyzed by a computer in just a few minutes. Mind-blowing, right? It felt like science fiction when I first heard about it. Here’s what I’ve learned about this approach: • It’s data-driven, optimizing every stage of the design process. • Automation takes care of the repetitive stuff, letting architects focus on what really matters—being creative. • Big firms like Zaha Hadid Architects are already using it to stay ahead. One firm I heard about used computational design to test thousands of facade options, balancing aesthetics with energy efficiency in a fraction of the time it would've taken manually. But it makes me wonder—are we holding ourselves back by sticking to old-school methods? What other industries could benefit from this kind of transformation? #DesignEvolution #ComputationalDesign #ArchitecturalInnovation #FutureOfWork

In high school, I considered a career in architecture. I always marveled at the New York skyline and thought it would be so amazing to construct a building. But alas, after some classes, I realized it was too math heavy and formal for me. What I find interesting today is how I migrated to design where in our field of product design there are many analogies to physically building a structure. Here are a few. 1. Prototyping: Both fields create prototypes to visualize and test ideas before final production. Architects build models and mock-ups, while product designers develop digital prototypes. 2. User-Centric Design: Both disciplines emphasize understanding the needs and behaviors of users. Architects consider how people will interact with and use a space, while product designers focus on user experience and journeys. 3. Iterative Development: Both fields employ an iterative design process, continually refining and improving their designs based on feedback and testing. 4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Architects and product designers often work in teams with various experts, such as engineers, quality assurance controllers, and stakeholders, to ensure all aspects of the design are addressed. 5. Accessibility Guidelines: Both disciplines follow specific guidelines to ensure their designs are accessible to all users, including those with disabilities. Architects adhere to building codes and standards like the ADA, while product designers follow WCA3 guidelines. 6. Design and Building Systems: Both fields use comprehensive systems to ensure consistency and quality in their work. Product designers use design systems that include guidelines, reusable components, and standards. Similarly, architects use building systems, building codes and standards, modular construction techniques, architectural patterns, style guides, and Building Information Modeling (BIM) to manage and streamline the design and construction process. Can you think of any other similarities? #uxdesign #architecture #designsystems #Skwair

Embracing Iterative Design with Custom Open-Source Tools in Architecture Architecture is inherently an iterative process layered with complexity. Traditionally, we relied on tracing paper to refine our sketches, adding nuances and details with each overlay. Today, open-source tools empower us to replicate and enhance this iterative approach digitally. I'm excited to share how I utilize three custom-made tools to streamline building design: Tool 1: Graph Packer Algorithm This tool allows me to define a graph with nodes and connections, effectively packing units within it. It helps visualize space allocations, understand corridor and core layouts, and ensures functional requirements are met early in the design process. Tool 2: Digital Tracing Interface By importing sketches from any source and setting them to scale, this tool lets me draw over existing images—much like layering tracing paper over a sketch. It enables precise boundary definitions and facade adjustments by manipulating room locations directly on the digital canvas. Tool 3: CSV-Based Building Generator Using a CSV file that outlines the polygon of the slab edge for the first level, this tool generates a 3D model of the building. It translates the refined 2D sketches into a tangible structure, bridging the gap between concept and realization. By integrating these tools, I can iterate faster, make more informed decisions, and enhance the overall design quality. Embracing open-source technology not only streamlines workflows but also opens up new avenues for creativity and innovation in architecture. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and experiences with digital tools in architectural design! #Architecture #Design #IterativeDesign #OpenSource #DigitalTools #Innovation #Technology #ArchitecturalDesign #BuildingDesign #GraphAlgorithms #DigitalSketching #3DModeling #CreativeProcess #DesignInnovation #TechInArchitecture #ConstructionTech #Engineering #DesignProcess #SoftwareDevelopment #Architects

Ask anyone what they think the term "architecture" means. Chances are you will probably never get the same answer twice. So what is architecture? You would think that as a tech guy I would want to give a long, detailed, comprehensive answer to that question that leaves no stone unturned. But after over a year of asking myself this question and exploring what "architecture" really is, I've landed on this definition: 🏗 Architecture is the *art* and *science* of *designing* and *implementing* *structures*. That's it. The art and science of designing and implementing structures. Less than 10 words. But, Mike! That's way too high level! Is it? OK, if we're talking about physical architecture like an office building, structure is easy to conceptualize. But conceptual architecture like technical or business architecture? Admittedly a little more abstract and difficult to see what are essentially invisible structures like code structures, organizational structures, or market structures. Regardless, the fundamental principles of architecture still apply. 🎨 Art? If you think about the process of creating architecture as being imaginitive, innovative, and focused on visual appeal, this works. 🔬 Science? I know "science" in general gets a bad rap for providing facts and truths that people may not want to hear or that disrupt convenient narratives, but it's the analysis, rigor, and methodology that is needed to create useful and lasting structures. 📐 Design? At its core, design is about solving problems by planning and organizing the components that will eventually come together to form structure. Design balances form and function, and is the most critical element of creating great architecture. 🛠 Implementation? Design without implementation is just an idea. Planning, coordinating, mitigating risks, and managing stakeholder expectations and relationships are all necessary for structures to take shape and be introduced to the world. What do you think? Does this fit with your understanding of the concept of architecture? What's your definition? Mike --- Photo by Azzedine Rouichi on Unsplash

- Enhancing Client Collaboration Through the Power of Architectural Visualization - In the world of architectural design, communication is everything. One of the biggest challenges we face is ensuring that every stakeholder—from clients to construction teams—has a clear and consistent understanding of the design vision. Recently, we tackled a project where this need for clarity was paramount. Our solution? Leveraging advanced architectural visualization to bridge the gap between design intent and execution. By creating highly detailed and realistic renderings, we were able to present the design in a way that was not only visually compelling but also easy for everyone involved to understand. This level of detail facilitated more meaningful discussions, allowing the client to visualize their future space with confidence and enabling the design team to make informed decisions that aligned with the client’s vision. The result was a collaborative process that was both smooth and efficient, leading to a final design that exceeded expectations. Architectural visualization proved to be more than just a tool—it was a critical component in delivering a project that was true to the client’s vision, on time, and within budget. #ArchitecturalVisualization #DesignCommunication #ClientCollaboration #3DRendering #Architecture