Sounds like abrams is a hoax. Close the designing, scrap the rest of these rust buckets. It appeared to be worse than even T-72s and T-64s with a bbq case on their top.
It was supposed to shoot a lot of ammo and hit a lot of targets at the front... Before it dies... But it doesn't work. It just dies. It doesn't need many hits. It burns like a christmas tree.
For long they were supposed to defeat donkey riding middle eastern cavalry with slings and sticks. And they barely succeeded there. Today they cost a fortune. They get an automatic transmission, climax control. But require pink pony rainbow fuel, air support, intelligence support, many maintenance, electronic wonders, political support from the very top.
What they have got today? No quality fuel, no air, no intelligence, no maintenance, electronics stolen and sold, and the political rooftop is kinda leaking (when not talking to invisible friends or touching children). And no dollars stuffed pinata. And the russian army is a little bit different, not a cavalry. And the armor... Tons of armor is not required any more. The modern ammo pierce 7 feet of armor like butter. The engine sux, the suspension sux, the caterpillars not replaceable in the field, the drivers drunk, the fuel stolen.
Abrams is a liquid qrap bucket not suitable for any war including the contemporary war of drones.
Let's wait for F-16. But you can bring F-35s already.
Warehouse Associate
1moCan't wait