Woods Valldata’s Post

🔍 https://hubs.ly/Q02xcPkJ0 Confused about External Lottery Managers (ELMs) for your charity lottery? Our straight-forward blog breaks it down. Discover why they're crucial and how to choose the right one! #CharityLottery #FundraisingTips

🔍 https://hubs.ly/Q02xcQCc0 Confused about External Lottery Managers (ELMs) for your charity lottery? Our straight-forward blog breaks it down. Discover why they're crucial and how to choose the right one! #CharityLottery #FundraisingTips

What are the key regulations governing online lottery platforms in India and the USA? India: In India, gambling laws are mostly regulated at the state level, and the legal status of lotteries can differ from one state to another. Some states allow lotteries to be conducted both online and offline, while others have banned lotteries altogether. The Public Gambling Act of 1867 is a central law that gives states the authority to formulate their own gambling laws. However, there is no specific federal legislation governing online lotteries in India. States like Kerala, Sikkim, Goa, and Maharashtra have their own laws and regulations regarding lotteries. For example, Sikkim has allowed online lottery sales within its state borders under certain conditions. USA: In the USA, the legality of lotteries, including online lotteries, is determined by both federal and state laws. The federal government primarily regulates interstate gambling activities through laws such as the Wire Act and the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006. The Wire Act prohibits the use of wire communications for interstate gambling, which has implications for online gambling activities that cross state lines. At the state level, each state has its own laws and regulations regarding lotteries. Some states have embraced online lottery sales, while others have prohibited them. For instance, states like New York, Pennsylvania, and Michigan have legalized online lottery sales, while others like Utah and Hawaii have strict anti-gambling laws that extend to online lotteries. https://lnkd.in/gvC2wCjb

🌟 Unlocking the Potential of External Lottery Managers (ELMs) 🌟 https://hubs.ly/Q02xcQCg0 If you're venturing into the world of charity lotteries or raffles, understanding the role of an External Lottery Manager (ELM) is essential. But what exactly is an ELM, and why should your charity consider using one? What is an ELM? According to the Gambling Commission, an ELM is someone who arranges lotteries on behalf of a society or authority but is not directly part of it. Essentially, they help you run your lottery by managing various aspects like promotions, ticket transactions, and draws. Why Use an ELM? While managing everything in-house is an option, partnering with an ELM offers added security and expertise. ELMs are well-versed in compliance with the Gambling Commission's regulations and can handle multiple aspects of your lottery program efficiently. 4 Things to Look for in an ELM: 1. Secure Environment: Ensure they prioritise data security for your players. 2. Systems and Processes: Check if they have the necessary systems to handle prize-led fundraising responsibly. 3. Knowledge of Regulations: Confirm their understanding of the Gambling Commission's rules and standards. 4. Breadth of Services: Choose an ELM that can support various elements of your lottery program. Why Choose Woods Valldata as Your ELM? At Woods Valldata, we pride ourselves on being trusted ELMs for over 60 UK charities. With stringent compliance measures, dedicated supporter services, and extensive expertise, we're more than just a service provider – we're your strategic partner in fundraising success. Ready to explore our suite of weekly lottery products or learn more about ELMs? Contact us to arrange a meeting! Let's make your charity lottery a resounding success together. #CharityFundraising #LotteryManagement

Yesterday, I took the unprecedented step of stapling my fingers together so I couldn't take an emotional view to social media on this, It was important to take all factors into consideration, In particular - the good work Annie Ashton has done. I have no doubt her complaint is genuine and she has every right to be furious with the research education and treatment sector after the monstrosity of QC choice at Luke's inquest. This was unforgiveable and does nothing to help the view of independence. That said, the complaint is exceptionally hypocritical. GambleAware are not on any industry Christmas card lists, nor are they on many of the third sectors either. The complaint seems to be centred on it's education and messaging offering, or that it has funded. There are VERY strict rules that the Charity regulator mandates to ensure education is free from politically motivated organisations. Children's education should not be a war zone for politically motivated organisations to fight over. An organisation MUST provide both sides of a view, where it is not clear that one side is correct. In short, education programmes on gambling addictions must take the view that the majority of people gamble responsibly, as the evidence suggests, however - it MUST give both sides. I can tell you with absolute certainty, all of GambleAware supported education provides this. The line that shrouds charity law which stands out the most is this 'Where a charity is established to advance education trustees should be mindful of the need for balance and neutrality particularly in areas of controversy and political debate to ensure that it is educational. This means presenting both sides of the argument and allowing an individual to make up their own minds and choose for themselves. A series of seminars, conferences or lectures promoting only one set of views would fail to meet this requirement.' 'The law draws a distinction between advancing education and promoting a particular view, even where the views are sincerely held and may be supported by some academic research.' I would urge Will, and Gambling with lives to consider their own educational offering, which has pictures of demons throughout it's slide decks when talking about industry, that there must be balance, and the furthering of one side of debate is not following the charity commissions rules on education. You CANNOT just go into schools and convince young people that gambling will ruin their lives. This does not compute with reality and is simply the reverse of what they're accusing GambleAware of, Independence goes both ways. It is my view that this complaint is a political stunt aimed at dragging Gambleaware through the mud to ensure a mandatory levy is kept from their commissioning powers. The complaint is unhelpful, unwarranted and a waste of time and resource. The quicker all sides stop this incessant politics the quicker we can all get to the crux of helping people with addictions.

Online raffles have become a super popular way to raise money, But with anything involving money and prizes, you might be wondering: Is it legal to run an online raffle in the UK? #raffaly #competition #lottery #raffle #raffles #onlineraffle #blog #blogpost #onlineraffle

Recently, we've delved into a critical question that often comes up when we speak with fundraisers: Do charity lotteries contribute to problem gambling? 🎰 Our latest blog post sheds light on this concern and provides insights into the nuanced relationship between charity lotteries and responsible play. Curious to read deeper into this discussion? Explore our comprehensive blog post here: https://lnkd.in/gtyMsGhs #ResponsiblePlay #Fundraising #Nonprofit #SocialImpact #CharityWork #Discussion

Just because the proceeds of a gambling activity, which is still what lotteries are, goes to a good cause this doesn’t eliminate the potential harms. Organisations like GambleAware being funded via a statutory levy, rather than voluntary donations from the gambling industry, will increase the confidence in the independence of charities supporting means to prevent gambling harm. As valuable as these revenue streams undoubtedly are to a number of organisations, and are potentially a legitimate source of income generation, depending upon your viewpoint, creating special conditions for certain types of lotteries does not seem the way to go….

Baroness Twycross' speech at the GambleAware annual conference on 4 December 2024. Is this a sign that #prize #draws will not be regulated as #lotteries as was feared, following the #gambling #Whitepaper. From what I have seen, some free draw operators have responded with enhanced consumer protection measures and increased charitable contributions. "It is not just the regulated gambling sector that needs to do more to protect consumers though. Large scale prize draws, like Omaze, are a significant and growing market. Whilst not regulated under the Gambling Act, I want the people who participate in draws with these companies to be confident that proportionate protections are in place. I am grateful for the voluntary action taken so far by the sector to act transparently and apply player protection measures. I want to ensure high standards in this area and will be meeting the sector to discuss this work." https://lnkd.in/eYNTKqRk #Omaze has recently announced that it has increased charitable donations from 80% of net proceeds (profits) to 17% of ticket sales from each house draw - this is not far off the minimum 20% of ticket sales that lotteries must apply towards the good cause. https://lnkd.in/eW7UUgrP