Tim MacDonald’s Post

View profile for Tim MacDonald, graphic

Co-Founder, Project Law Group, PLLC

"People are vulnerable ... because they don’t have an accurate view of the economy to begin with.” Robert Reich This resonates with me. I feel that our shared common sense cannot make much sense out of the story we are being sold today, about the economy. Why is it so hard to make sense of this story? It's not you. It's the story. It is obsolete. Incomplete. And fundamentally flawed. It is a story we inherited from the closing decades of the 20th Century, that starts out as a 19th Century social narrative of PROGRESS into an infinitely receding frontier for endless market expansion through technological innovation and economies of scale that gets reduced over the course of the 20th Century to GROWTH as the simple numerical increase in the volume of qualitatively undifferentiated transactions measured in prices paid in money from one period of measurement to the next, severing all common sense connections between quantities of money and quality of life, and replacing common sense with the nonsense that more is alway better. We are being sold a story of the economy as the production and distribution of goods and services through markets for allocating scarcity through price, roiled by the forces of Creative Destruction. We are being told that we each and all must work hard to produce and consume more, so that the markets can give us more. In exchange, we are promised: 1. that more will always be better; and 2. that we will each, as freely self-determining market participants, will be free to determine, each for ourselves, our own personal and individual share of the more that the markets give us. We sold that the markets always get it right, except when they don't, and that GOVERNMENT is bad because it oppresses through regulation our freedom of self-determination in the markets, except when the markets fail. Then Government is needed to shore up the Markets, and get them going again. Civil Society is marginalized. Finance is trivialized. All social decision making is reduced to this mythical battle between Markets and Government, private vs public, policy vs price, shared vs individual, coercion vs. FREEDOM! It is a very violent, contentious, conflict-ridden way of describing our uniquely human way of being in an artificial world that we make together, for ourselves to live in, through our technologies, out of the world of Nature into which we all are born, as a mutual aid society for sharing an abundance of technology solutions to the everyday problems of all of us, as everyday people, living our best lives under the circumstances every day, through networks of connections for enterprise and exchange using money as a legal instrument for effecting transaction between people separated by distances of time, place and social connection that is also the social energy through which society directs our individual insight and initiative towards some activities and away from others.

Announcing our “Debunk” series, starting next Friday!

Announcing our “Debunk” series, starting next Friday!

robertreich.substack.com

Tim MacDonald

Co-Founder, Project Law Group, PLLC

7mo

It is also wrong. Which is why it makes no sense to our common sense. We know from lived experience that more is not always better. It depends. More of what? Better for whom? The connection between quantities of money and quality of life matters. It needs to be managed. Also, people don't make choices in the markets. Money does. Or, rather, people make choices in the markets by spending money. If you don't have money to spend, you don't have a voice in the markets. If you have lots of money under your control, you have an outsized voice in the markets. In politics it may be one person, one vote, but in the markets, it's one dollar, one vote. And some people control many more dollars that other people. Lastly, money matters. And finance matters. It is through our financial institutions of agency, authority and accountability for aggregating our savings and deploying those aggregations to supply money to enterprise for its use, for a purpose, for a time, at a cost and on terms that society shapes the enterprises that shape the technologies that shape the choices that shape the economy that shapes society, and our shared future. We need to hold those institutions accountable. We are not.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics