The article below paints a disturbing picture of how people's safety has been handled. Several names pass by of persons with little to no knowledge of crowd safety but are responsible for it and do not know what they are doing.
Sadly, this happens with some regularity in event planning: people are responsible for something they do not understand. Somehow, miraculously, most of those events go fine, but not because of the high quality of (crowd safety) planning. Prof. Dr. G. Keith Still, therefore, calls it "Problems lying in wait," which refers to problems in planning that wait for the right trigger to strike mercilessly hard during the event.
Would you board a plane if you knew the pilot was incompetent? If your answer is 'no', why do we accept individuals being responsible for tasks they are incompetent at at mass events?
Regarding crowd safety responsibilities, the lack of proper qualifications, diplomas, experience and demonstrable performance should be a red flag for event organisers, relevant authorities, advisory services and licensing bodies. And, of course, for the person in question: don't take on such an assignment or say that certain issues are over your head.
We can prevent such tragedies together if we want, but only if we all take responsibility.
Ps: Kudos to the event organisations that take crowd safety seriously and invest in it!👌🎉
#crowdsafety
https://lnkd.in/eradVFWv
Director of HiViz Event Management Ltd
6moInteresting that the descriptor used is “overcrowding” when it reads that that is exactly what is being avoided by managing capacities.