Venkat Ramana’s Post

View profile for Venkat Ramana, graphic

Chief Executive Officer at valuepitch

What does Grok think of GPT 4o? The response to GPT-4o seems to vary among users, with some expressing positive impressions and others noting issues or limitations. Here's a summary of the feedback from the X posts: 1. @StefanJuang mentions GPT-4o being fast and free to use, but there's speculation that it might be a smaller model trained on synthetic data by GPT-4, which could affect its performance. 2. @krishnanrohit highlights GPT-4o's speed, noting it's less lazy but also prone to making things up. 3. @maceskridge acknowledges GPT-4o's improvements but points out that it still has issues with hallucination and sophistry, which can be problematic for deployment. 4. @realahart finds no significant change between GPT-4o and GPT-4, suggesting that the improvements may not be immediately apparent. 5. @Barnacules appreciates GPT-4o's lower API cost and faster response speed but notes that it still doesn't provide as good coding answers as expected. 6. @nielsgeo expresses disappointment, feeling that GPT-4o is less intelligent than GPT-4. 7. @mawntee clarifies that GPT-4o is a newer version of GPT-4-Turbo, designed for quicker and more natural responses, but standard issue GPT-4 might still be better for tasks requiring deeper comprehension. Overall, the community seems to have mixed feelings about GPT-4o, with some appreciating its speed and cost-effectiveness, while others are concerned about its accuracy and depth of understanding compared to its predecessor.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics