Version2.ai’s Post

When we first introduced Fully Autonomous Fundraising and the Virtual Engagement Officer (VEO), we were told that the opt-out rate would be extremely high, somewhere between 5-10% because donors would not want to interact with AI. However, in practice, we’ve found the complete opposite: Opt-out rates for traditional engagement channels are 2-12x greater than the VEO. · Direct Mail expects about a 0.5 opt-out rate. · SMS Text expects up to a 1.5% opt-out rate. · Email expects up to a 0.26% opt-out rate. · The VEO has a 0.12% opt-out rate. The reason opt-outs for the VEO are about less than half of the next best channel is because Autonomous Fundraising is not a marketing channel, it’s a frontline fundraiser that is a partner in your work. The VEO connects with donors and supporters via one-to-one engagement. And, because of highly personalized, thoughtful, and helpful messaging, virtually nobody opts-out. This is the future of fundraising. Learn more: https://www.version2.ai

  • diagram, text
Reilly Conroy

Senior Account Executive at Version2.ai (a Division of Givzey)

3mo

This continues to prove that VEOs function more like members of our teams than tools. A VEO is a relationship manager, not a mass-marketing tool, and these numbers demonstrate that donors feel that way, too!

Kevin Leahy

CMO | Givzey / Version2 | Nonprofit Autonomous Fundraising & Gift Documentation

3mo

"Opt-out rates for traditional engagement channels are 2-12x greater than the VEO."

Engagement is so vital for those donors who are not currently assigned in a portfolio. The Virtual Engagement Officers (VEOs) create that 1:1 connection with the individual constituent, and the extremely low opt out rate that we have seen bears testimony to that!

Like
Reply

I love the transparency of the VEO data!

Courtney Harrness

Director of Strategic Advancement

3mo

Insightful!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics