Veterans Beer Club DC’s Post

This is the value in the Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF) vs the medical-model. https://lnkd.in/grZ7_Jb4

Great piece to camera from Pearl - love this approach. I think that Next Meal are based in London Borough of Haringey. As we know Geoff down in Cornwall is a proponent of 80:20 ie trying to get 80% of benefit for 20% of cost. Next Meal is such a great idea but how can Pearl achieve 80% of what she wants to achieve by only spending 20% of budget. Well as far as property is concerned I’ll attach the list of property assets that those who live in Haringey actually own albeit through the London Borough of Haringey as council in its role as freeholder of real estate assets within its boundaries. Is LBH making best use of its assets for its communities ie “ sweating “ them to use a culinary/ real estate term of art. If not , could the Estates Department at LBH identify those of its assets which are surplus to operational usage and allow them to be used by collectives of Third Sector organisations like Next Meal to make a difference day to day. After all there are something like 140,000 charities in the U.K…. If there weren’t demands for their services we wouldn’t need them. So why not offer such surplus real assets to charities like Next Meal to use them for “ meantime use” …. In this case providing sustinence & support but also perhaps shelter from the storm … both economically and physically. Good work - Pearl and your colleagues

If you are feeling worried or despondent about what's happening in the UK, make the time to listen to this. And then read Gamal Turawa (MIDHP)'s bio!

The key word here is ADJUSTMENT

Stay Tuned

This post Speak Volumns of Wisdom!!!!!😊😊😊😊😊😊☕☕

That's great news! It looks like famous YouTubers are also making their mark on LinkedIn but We're not active on YouTube, which is why our followers and connections are only in the thousands. #adeelarifkhan #ebusinesswala #linkedin

#MaritimeSheEO : Empowerment or the Beginning of a New Journey of Exploitation? A Critical Look at the women in Indian Maritime Industry. The MaritimeSheEO initiative has sparked significant debate within the Indian seafarer community. Many feel that this organization, like others before it, is primarily focused on branding and profit rather than genuinely supporting seafarers. Critics argue that similar organizations, including the (ITF), have allowed individuals to establish lucrative careers at the expense of the seafarers they claim to support. Indian seafarers, particularly women, continue to face immense challenges. Despite efforts to integrate female seafarers into the industry, there are fears that without proper legal frameworks and protections, these women could be exploited. The current (RPSL) companies is also a major concern, with allegations of human trafficking in iran , malesiya and middle east and inadequate adherence to legal standards. The influx of women into the maritime market, without robust legal safeguards, could lead to exploitation, with recruiters potentially taking advantage of female seafarers in exchange for employment opportunities which the male seafarers are facing. This situation is exacerbated by the existing issues within the Indian maritime ecosystem, including problematic training institutes and hiring practices. Moreover, Indian seafarers are increasingly being replaced by their counterparts from Ukraine, China, the Philippines, and Indonesia. This trend is attributed to behavioral issues rooted in the training and hiring systems in India. Introducing more women into this flawed system, without addressing these foundational problems, could lead to further exploitation and harm. In conclusion, while the intention behind initiatives like MaritimeSheEO may be to empower women, it is crucial to first establish a solid legal and ethical framework to protect all seafarers. Without these safeguards, the risk of exploitation and abuse remains high, and the noble goal of gender equality in the maritime industry could be undermined.