A long read, but so insightful on 1944 D-Day lessons for why and how Europe, as part of NATO, should support Ukraine’s fight for freedom today. Quotes:
- Ukrainians, no matter how plucky and innovative, will not be able to liberate their country by their own means and efforts alone.
- A D-Day style organisation with senior military personnel overseeing the effort could be a game changer. It could keep Ukraine in the fight and eventually help it to prevail.
- One idea for the upcoming NATO Summit in Washington in July is to place all this planning, coordinating and supply chain activity under NATO, which has the big bureaucracy and procurement agencies to run such a show.
- D-Day was not about caution and half measures but the willingness to take great but calculated risks to achieve an absolutely essential aim: the defeat and destruction of the Nazi regime. Is stopping Russia from destroying Ukraine and threatening Western security and democracy worth a similar effort?
- Only the fact of military defeat can make them [tyrants like Hitler or Putin] reverse course, or make their accomplices finally turn against them.
- Reversing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine creates the opportunity now to complete the unification of Europe and extend the same freedoms, democracy and security right across the continent to its eastern fringes. A process that can finally achieve the enterprise that D-Day started.
- [D-Day Allies in 1944] paid the price because they believed –from leaders to simple soldiers– that totalitarian and racist regimes enslaving whole populations and extolling the culture of war and violence had to be defeated if the heritage of centuries of Western civilisation building was not to be destroyed. It is that fundamental conviction and the effort that flowed from it which is the message that D-Day sends to us across the eight decades since the landings on Omaha, Sword and Juno beaches.