Wildlife and Countryside Link’s Post

The Government's (legally binding) target to halt the decline of wildlife needs action on the ground from businesses and decision makers. But how do we make sure the chain of responsibility makes it to them from the Secretary of State? A new report published today by WWF-UK makes the case for Government to develop “nature-positive pathways”, setting out how different economic sectors should contribute to halting and reversing nature’s decline by 2030. It argues that Government should decide how much each sector must contribute to solving the key causes of nature-loss, based on how much that sector contributes to the problem, the cost and opportunities of change, and the impacts on people and businesses. Overall, the effort allocated to each sector should add up to meeting the targets. From there, the Government should work with businesses to set out the big policy levers needed for change in each sector, giving certainty for investment as well as clear accountability. Read more: https://lnkd.in/eykUEMU3

  • Image of someone lifting a plant from the ground, ready for repotting
Steve Trowbridge

Civil and Structural Engineering Consultant

2mo

We know we dont need to take any more land. Cant we just change the tax system to make better alteratives or is now the wildlife business has a vested interest (income) in building unsustainable homes?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics