ICYMI: In an IPR proceeding at the PTAB, the respondent turned to WIT for an automotive technology expert. Read the case study to learn how WIT was able to meet the expert need: https://lnkd.in/eyE6cSgH
WIT Legal, LLC’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
In an IPR proceeding at the PTAB, the respondent turned to WIT for an automotive technology expert. Read the case study to learn how WIT was able to meet the expert need: https://lnkd.in/eyE6cSgH
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚗🔧 Automotive technology expertise, on demand! When the stakes were high in an IPR proceeding, WIT stepped up to connect the respondent with a top-tier automotive technology expert. Check out our case study to see how we made it happen! #ExpertWitness #AutomotiveTech #PTAB #IPR
In an IPR proceeding at the PTAB, the respondent turned to WIT for an automotive technology expert. Read the case study to learn how WIT was able to meet the expert need: https://lnkd.in/eyE6cSgH
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This recent MarketEYE article by Kevin Sink, @TTI VP Total Quality, is centered around counterfeit parts and materials, including the latest trends in counterfeit electronic components and strategies to combat them. https://bit.ly/4g7pW7P #TTIinc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This recent MarketEYE article by Kevin Sink, @TTI VP Total Quality, is centered around counterfeit parts and materials, including the latest trends in counterfeit electronic components and strategies to combat them. https://bit.ly/4g7pW7P #TTIinc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This recent MarketEYE article by Kevin Sink, @TTI VP Total Quality, is centered around counterfeit parts and materials, including the latest trends in counterfeit electronic components and strategies to combat them. https://bit.ly/4g7pW7P #TTIinc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This recent MarketEYE article by Kevin Sink, @TTI VP Total Quality, is centered around counterfeit parts and materials, including the latest trends in counterfeit electronic components and strategies to combat them. https://bit.ly/4g7pW7P #TTIinc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This recent MarketEYE article by Kevin Sink, @TTI VP Total Quality, is centered around counterfeit parts and materials, including the latest trends in counterfeit electronic components and strategies to combat them. https://bit.ly/4g7pW7P #TTIinc
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
When you are in a hurry to expedite an appeal against the dismissal of security for costs, you must still take the time to specify and substantiate why you need a fast track. That is the identical lesson from nine substantively identical orders of the UPC Court of Appeal of 22 May 2024 in appeals lodged by Volkswagen, Audi and Texas Instruments in infringement cases regarding three patents of Network Technologies Technologies (“NST”), in which security for costs to be given by this American patentee was denied. https://lnkd.in/eRH7Zk_e The mere fact that the one of the official “raisons d’être” of the UPC is to ensure expeditious decisions, as stated in the preamble of the UPC Agreement, is not enough to allow a fast track appeal. The request by the Appellants to expedite the appeal and shorten any deadlines was denied for being too unspecified and insufficiently substantiated. For case law on the power of the court to shorten time periods (Rule 9(3) RoP): https://lnkd.in/eUd28eCT #upc, #upcnugget
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
#UPC 💡💡💡 maybe interesting to note is that the standard deadline for submitting/reasoning such appeal is 15 days and for responding another 15 days. So there is no real need for any further expediting or shortening.
When you are in a hurry to expedite an appeal against the dismissal of security for costs, you must still take the time to specify and substantiate why you need a fast track. That is the identical lesson from nine substantively identical orders of the UPC Court of Appeal of 22 May 2024 in appeals lodged by Volkswagen, Audi and Texas Instruments in infringement cases regarding three patents of Network Technologies Technologies (“NST”), in which security for costs to be given by this American patentee was denied. https://lnkd.in/eRH7Zk_e The mere fact that the one of the official “raisons d’être” of the UPC is to ensure expeditious decisions, as stated in the preamble of the UPC Agreement, is not enough to allow a fast track appeal. The request by the Appellants to expedite the appeal and shorten any deadlines was denied for being too unspecified and insufficiently substantiated. For case law on the power of the court to shorten time periods (Rule 9(3) RoP): https://lnkd.in/eUd28eCT #upc, #upcnugget
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Pushing Boundaries in Precision – Discover the VECTOR F8 dyno At framag, quality assurance means delivering performance without compromise. The VECTOR F8 shock dyno empowers customers to push shock absorbers to their limits, ensuring reliable performance even under the toughest conditions. This technology helps customers reduce testing time and optimize their own product development. Discover how our VECTOR F8 is setting new standards in precision and reliability. 🔍
To view or add a comment, sign in
1,875 followers