WoundSource’s Post

Join the chucklingly complex world of clinical research as we explore 'Objective Adherence: The Woodchuck Way to Clinical Research Success' https://lnkd.in/dsYU4V_4

We continue to highlight scientific research and assessment this week for #PainAwarenessMonth. Check out articles like “Integrated pain care models and the importance of aligning stakeholder values” by Hooten et al. in #PainReports https://bit.ly/4bA1fib

A really good topic and addressed well in this paper by Dr Baghdadi, University of Maryland: Diagnostic Stewardship - using the right test at the right time to improve clinical outcomes. https://lnkd.in/gdGTkjin

What is the percentage of clinicians that participate actively in research? Do clinicians conduct research only when absolutely necessary (for example when it’s a requirement to pass an exam)? What are the barriers that prevent clinicians from participating in research? These and much more will be explored in our upcoming session with Dr Oladimeji Adebayo. Join us on the 🗓️2nd of Novemeber, 2024 by 🕰️8am (GMT+1) as we explore “Overcoming Barriers to Research Participation Among Clinicians”. Register for the session via🔗 https://bit.ly/4hkjrzv

➡️ 7-day continuous cough monitoring outperforms 24-hour methods ⬅️ This latest Hyfe white paper presents data-driven evidence showing how prolonged monitoring provides more reliable insights for clinical trials and research studies, offering a new standard for understanding cough variability. 🔗 Find the link in the comments

Bayesian statistics for clinical research CCR Journal Watch https://lnkd.in/e3Mip9Di Get the latest critical care literature every weekend via the CCR Newsletter - subscribe at https://lnkd.in/eXy6bibT

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures may come with ambiguity, but they hold key insights in patient experience, crucial in measuring health outcomes across all healthcare domains with usefulness, accuracy, and precision. Great podcast discussing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the context of population health.

Cough Science 1.0 - cough is "measured" using Patient Reported Outcomes Cough Science 2.0 - cough is measured using 24h audio recordings (which are then processed by humans). Cough Science 3.0 - cough is measured continously, over prolonged periods of time This paper answers a critical question for Cough Science 3.0: Given cough's extreme variability, how long is long enough to monitor most patients in order to get accurate insights? Comment below and I will send you the paper by DM

👉 Facing challenges performing Indirect Pulp Capping on patients with hypersensitivity? Look no further! 🔍 Here is an enlightening clinical case study by Dr. Ganowicz using Biodentine XP in Bio-Bulk Fill procedure. 👉Learn more: https://ow.ly/ZKnk50RstPe

Improve your healthcare decisions with the latest high-quality, independent evidence. 📚 🔍 A systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view aimed at minimizing bias, to produce more reliable findings to inform decision making. 💜 Visit the Cochrane Library and search for trusted healthcare evidence: https://lnkd.in/emz9-BW