Yuno AI’s Post

Yuno AI reposted this

View profile for Marco Raineri, graphic

Entrepreneur & Business Consultant | Scaling Businesses & Transforming Processes | Speaker & Thought Leader

Thank you for sharing this framework! As someone that targets corporate venturing, I can see the value it brings. Here’s how Yuno AI can enhance it further: 🔍 Perfect Fit: Yuno AI uses advanced natural language processing to find companies that align perfectly with your strategic goals, saving time and ensuring relevance. 💡 Cost Efficiency: Yuno AI’s AI-driven insights reduce the need for costly consulting firms, streamlining the identification process and allowing more efficient resource allocation. 📈 Investment Optimization: With Yuno AI' s investment thesis match logic, you’ll have a continuous influx of tailored, high-potential deals, leading to smarter investments and higher returns. Yuno AI empowers corporations to innovate effectively while saving time and money. Excited to see the impact on corporate venturing strategies! #CorporateVenturing #Innovation #YunoAI #AI #InvestmentStrategies #CostEfficiency

View profile for Frederic Pampus, graphic

Corporate Venturing Expert 💡 I advise companies on how Venture Clienting, Corporate Venture Building and Corporate Venture Capital can help them to innovate their business | MBA, ex VC, PE & Entrepreneur

All you need to know about Corporate Venturing in one view ⤵ The individual tools to innovate companies are well known and used. But how they fit together is often difficult to grasp. Therefore I'm happy to share with you the framework I've developed to discuss strategy with my clients: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗩𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘅 👉 We start outside with 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹: Build, Buy, Partner, Invest: 𝘉𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 = 𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘝𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 → Ideate, validate and build own ventures 𝘉𝘶𝘺 = 𝘔&𝘈 → Acquires startups and/or merge own with external ventures 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘳 = 𝘝𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘊𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 → Become customer of startup solutions to solve internal problems 𝘐𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵 = 𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘝𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘊𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭 → Invests equity and become minority shareholder 👉 Some companies understand the benefits of combining 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀: Want to realize full ownership in what you do? → 𝘉𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘣𝘶𝘺 𝘪𝘧 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵 Focus lies on solving internal problems? → 𝘙𝘶𝘯 𝘢 𝘗𝘰𝘊 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘳 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯, 𝘪𝘧 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 (𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭) Want access to external solutions? → 𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘧 𝘣𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘵/𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘧𝘪𝘵 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺, 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵 Looking for financial return? → 𝘉𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 (𝘊𝘝𝘊) 𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 (𝘔&𝘈) 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳 👉 Then, there are companies that leverage 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀: The Integrators → 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘧 𝘗𝘰𝘊 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘧𝘶𝘭, 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘶𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘪𝘧 𝘯𝘰𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 The Partners → 𝘋𝘰 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘯-𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘴, 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳 The Innovators → 𝘓𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 The Investors → 𝘞𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥-𝘵𝘰-𝘰𝘸𝘯, 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘰 𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘤𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘧𝘶𝘭 👉 Finally, the most innovative corporates make use of 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀. Whereas this does not mean to actively follow each approach, they have defined and prepared relevant structures and processes. 💡 That's how they solve problems efficiently and seize opportunities when they arise. What's your view on combining the tools? #CorporateVenturing P.S. Looking for corporate venturing advice for your company? ↳ Schedule a 30 min call via my profile

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics